Laughable. He earned every bit of the "advantages" by being a flat our better goalie than Reimer until last year. For some reason no one outside of Leafs Nation seems to understand, he was fighting an uphill battle with the fanbase that had an irrational affection to Reimer. Bernier earned the starting job for two seasons. Then he lost it. Him being gone now doesn't retroactively change anything about that.
Other than being easily better than Reimer over that stretch, I can even agree with that. It was made absurdly tough for him.
2013-14 did not exist? That was easily more than solid.
Those dreadful teams did a lot worse to him than the other way around. But it's neat Leafs Nation got rid of their prime scapegoat.
The more you post, the more you prove that you know nothing about the Toronto Maple Leaf goaltending situation, apart from a 20 game stretch where Bernier put up an absolutely incredible .920 SV%. A stretch, I might add, where he was sent down to the AHL in the middle of. (As bad as the Leaf goaltending has been over the years, I can't remember the last time an "established" goalie had to be sent down for reconditioning). He posted a shutout his first game back, only to eventually struggle again and gain the ire of his head coach. His handful of excellent games were over-shadowed by his brutal ones.
In regards to this apparent love affair with James Reimer, I hope you realize he was just as hated as Bernier was. There was no love affair with Reimer and most Leaf fans were glad to see him go. Sure there were people who loved him but there were also people who loved Bernier. I think most fans were happy to see the back of both of them. The Bernier/Reimer debate was constant in our boards all year. I'm not sure why you think there was a love affair with Reimer. The shear amount of awful, back breaking goals, these 2 let in over the years, would have any fan base seething. It gets tiring when uninformed fans make up love affairs with Reimer, to fit their own narrative.
You keep obsessing over this incredible 20 game, .920 sample size and the one season (three years ago) he was decent and disregard the rest of the games he played in, games that make up over 50 percent of his starts in Toronto. Sounds like a narrative to me. I'm sorry but .908 and .912, his last 2 years, is not going to cut it. Especially when you witness the impact his mental breakdowns had on the team, on a game to game basis. I know that so many people love to stat watch and can't put their head around context but you can't just cherry pick some stats and not actually watch the games.
Bernier had some really good games with Toronto but unfortunately, he also had more shockingly bad ones. His inconsistency and mental weakness did him in and .920 over 20 games (and I repeat, 20 games where he had to be sent down for poor play in the middle of) does not over shadow that.