will1066
If you score four, you better f'n win the game
- Oct 12, 2008
- 52,416
- 75,536
The Mouth noticeably absent and shut.
Likely depends on whether we can buy some FA years with the contract. I'm doubtful he and his agent will want that thoughAbsolutely fantastic player. From all the Rangers games I've caught this season he has stood out big time (along with Panarin ofcourse). Super jealous of the Rangers having him. Have I understood correct that he's an RFA next season? What kind of contract are you guys expecting him to have? From what I've seen he looks easily worth 7-8mil/y or so..
Sorry, this is conjecture. I believe that if he could have been traded, he would have And as for when was the right time to commit, hindsight is nice. There was nothing wrong with wanting to see another solid year from him, production wise and attitude wise.Namestnikov could’ve easily been shipped for a bag of pucks at $3m. Instead we waited for a 4th from Ottawa? We should’ve taken nothing or even given up a late pick with Names to clear that space. Gorton could have absolutely have made it work but he didn't want to commit to DeAngelo when he should have.
Again, this is being viewed with hind sight. Virtually this entire board wanted Trouba. And saying that it is a bad contract is early, no?I can blame Gorton for a lot of things. The Shatty contract(6million next year), Trouba, Skjei,Smith all terrible contracts. With the emergence of ADA that is gonna be a problem
I was fine with the trade but the contract I hated from the get go. Smith I never wanted to resign. She yet Shatty wasn’t a terrible contract BUT we should have started the rebuild a year earlier, we weren’t good enough thenAgain, this is being viewed with hind sight. Virtually this entire board wanted Trouba. And saying that it is a bad contract is early, no?
Most here were clamoring for Smith after that playoff showing. Most here were crowing at how good of a deal the Shattenkirk contract was.
AhemAgain, this is being viewed with hind sight. Virtually this entire board wanted Trouba. And saying that it is a bad contract is early, no?
Most here were clamoring for Smith after that playoff showing. Most here were crowing at how good of a deal the Shattenkirk contract was.
That may not have been your viewpoints but the majority around here were cheering the moves.I was fine with the trade but the contract I hated from the get go. Smith I never wanted to resign. She yet Shatty wasn’t a terrible contract BUT we should have started the rebuild a year earlier, we weren’t good enough then
I cannot see any scenario where all three of DeAngelo, Fox and Lundqvist are all here an in the starting lineup.to think that we could have a defense featuring tony and adam plus nils and trouba here shortly.
I cannot see any scenario where all three of DeAngelo, Fox and Lundqvist are all here an in the starting lineup.
That is a different tale. I cannot see half of the defense being smallish puckmovers.if tony can somehow play the left side and pair with a defensively responsible partner
i do.
That is a different tale. I cannot see half of the defense being smallish puckmovers.
I didn't say that it does not. I said that I cannot see the Rangers having half of their defense being manned by such.the new nhl affords that opportunity.
I would easily take Trouba, DeAngelo, Fox and 3 Lindgren clones.i think ryan lindgren can evolve into a key part of this defense. so we need one more.
I can (Zac Jones), but not with one of them playing his off side.That is a different tale. I cannot see half of the defense being smallish puckmovers.
That is a different tale. I cannot see half of the defense being smallish puckmovers.
I think that there will be a solution. And it will be moving assets to get other assets or to shore up weaknesses. I cannot see half of a starting defense being comprised by smallish puck movers. Could be wrong, but do not see that as being part of Gorton's plan.Depends on a pairing. Trouba with ADA while Fox and Lundkvist with Rykov / Hajek / Lindgren / Miller (eventually) provides both size and puck-moving on all pairs. Not ideal I'd prefer a creative solution vs. losing one of these RDs.
I think that there will be a solution. And it will be moving assets to get other assets or to shore up weaknesses. I cannot see half of a starting defense being comprised by smallish puck movers. Could be wrong, but do not see that as being part of Gorton's plan.
I get it. But again, I am pretty sure that open spots will be filled with the type of players who take care of their end first and not think that they are a 4th forward.Yeah, but the detriment of having a smallish half of the defensive core is less than a benefit from it being a top-notch puck-moving and offensively talented.
I get it. But again, I am pretty sure that open spots will be filled with the type of players who take care of their end first and not think that they are a 4th forward.
Look, I could be wrong, but I highly doubt that plan is to have nothing but smallish puckmovers. Or even half of the starting 6 as such players.
We were talking about the possibility of DeAngelo, Fox & Lundqvist all being a part of the plan for the future defense.You keep saying nothing but smallish puckmovers and that's the part I don't get. Trouba, Skjei, Rykov, Hajek and Lindren are not small.
K'Andre Miller is certainly not small eitherYou keep saying nothing but smallish puckmovers and that's the part I don't get. Trouba, Skjei, Rykov, Hajek and Lindren are not small.