Confirmed with Link: Tomas Hertl 17% retained, 2025 3rd, 2027 3rd to Vegas for C David Edstrom, 2025 1st

TheWayToRefJose

Registered User
Oct 30, 2017
3,528
3,314
"Glad that first next year is unprotected because I'm sure we're all expecting the team that's made the playoffs 13 of the past 14 years to suddenly be bottom feeders in a year" - Senators fans right after the Karlsson trade
That’s not even the same and it’s crazy you’re trying to say it is.

Vegas isn’t an old team taking one last kick at the can.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan

GRANdSharks

Registered User
Mar 14, 2018
108
157
The deal is not bad, I like edstrom maybe Vegas falls apart by 2026 tho not guaranteed still a first.

That said ughhhh why did it have to be vegas
 

TheBeard

He fixes the cable?
Jul 12, 2019
18,125
20,857
Vegass
This is too down-to-earth and logical
Is it? Sometimes things go beyond the numbers. The team has a whopping 14 million in players currently signed in 2025. The team didn't need to get his cap off the books. What the team needs is reason to get the fans interested in the team again, and this was the exact opposite of that. The kind of move that might break a franchise. Sounds hyperbole, but when you're drawing about 7,000 a game and you just trade basically your only decent player to the team you hate the most after winning a cup, it's enough to just kill a fanbase.
 

The Nemesis

Semper Tyrannus
Apr 11, 2005
89,626
34,638
Langley, BC
I want someone to correct me if I’m just spewing nonsense or misinformation. I’m just reading the details and going by emotions, but I am ignorant about how retention works. This just doesn’t make sense from my limited knowledge.

Sharks needed to retain money on Hertl's deal for Vegas to be able to take on his contract and have any hope at structuring their roster to be cap compliant going forward. The issue probably is that with Hertl's deal he has a 3-team trade list for the next couple of years so he could pretty much dictate terms on where he goes and the Sharks would be handcuffed into accepting that and working out whatever deal they had to make within those limitations.

And Hertl's contract is still terrible so his value wouldn't have been as high as it should've been given his ability.

The more time that passes since the deal the more I'm able to calm down and recognize that while I'm still very sad and not super-enthused with the deal, it might represent the best the team could make of a very bad situation.
 

Hodge

Registered User
Apr 27, 2021
6,752
8,010
That’s not even the same and it’s crazy you’re trying to say it is.

Vegas isn’t an old team taking one last kick at the can.
Eichel and Stone are both First Team All-Bandaid. Marchessault, Stephenson, Martinez and Hanifin are pending UFAs. Also it's hockey. Anything can happen.

Just saying...it's not a "guaranteed late first" the way their 2024 1st is a guaranteed late first.
 

TheBeard

He fixes the cable?
Jul 12, 2019
18,125
20,857
Vegass
Eichel and Stone are both First Team All-Bandaid.
Until playoffs. Then they're ironmen. Stone hasn't missed a playoff game yet.

"Glad that first next year is unprotected because I'm sure we're all expecting the team that's made the playoffs 13 of the past 14 years to suddenly be bottom feeders in a year" - Senators fans right after the Karlsson trade
Even I know you're not dumb enough to compare the two like that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan

spintops

Registered User
Sep 13, 2013
1,767
1,170
Is it? Sometimes things go beyond the numbers. The team has a whopping 14 million in players currently signed in 2025. The team didn't need to get his cap off the books. What the team needs is reason to get the fans interested in the team again, and this was the exact opposite of that. The kind of move that might break a franchise. Sounds hyperbole, but when you're drawing about 7,000 a game and you just trade basically your only decent player to the team you hate the most after winning a cup, it's enough to just kill a fanbase.
There's a pretty good chance Hertl didn't want to be here. Hard to say what his value would be on the open market. Add a NTC to that and it's going to be tough to get anything for him.

Everyone is upset because it's Vegas, but value wise I don't think MG did bad considering the circumstances.
 

Pinkfloyd

Registered User
Oct 29, 2006
71,551
15,222
Folsom
This is a tough pill to swallow. I don't want to have to see Hertl back here in a Vegas sweater for another six years but getting Edstrom and a 1st is a good return even with the two 3rds going out and the retention. We weren't going to hit on those 3rd rounders in all likelihood. I think Edstrom can be a poor man's version of JEE as a 3C. I hope for Hertl's sake that Vegas goes back-to-back but then I hope they tank hard.
 

LilLeeroy

Registered User
Dec 14, 2013
818
991
Glad that first next year is unprotected because I'm sure we're all expecting the two time defending champs to suddenly be bottom feeders in a year.
The team that is old, injured, 2-7-1 in the last 10 games, and going all in this season. Their 2025 pick certainly isn't a bad one to have.

Hertl is washed, there isn't a single impact metric by which he has had a better season than even Gralund.
 
Last edited:

STL Shark

Registered User
Mar 6, 2013
4,401
5,465
Wait, we GAVE up the two thirds?

Man, Mike, I've been a devout supporter of you through some questionable decisions, but honestly you clearly don't have any sort of emotional understanding of the game.
Nah. Idiots on here only have an emotional understanding is the issue. Do everyone some good to gather some objectivity rather than merely emotions. Imagine being 4 years down the line and having a 35 because we’re too afraid to take a deal for our injured center signed for 6 more years at $8M+ a year.

We traded a 30 year old fresh off surgery signed for 6 more years at $8M+ and actually got value back. Given the dearth of cap space league wide and the weariness of GMs to take on money while giving up assets, this is a great deal. If there were a better one, he’d have taken it.

Also factor in Hertl has no trade protection too.
 

Coily

Gettin' Jiggy with it
Oct 8, 2008
34,629
2,249
Redlands
Is it? Sometimes things go beyond the numbers. The team has a whopping 14 million in players currently signed in 2025. The team didn't need to get his cap off the books. What the team needs is reason to get the fans interested in the team again, and this was the exact opposite of that. The kind of move that might break a franchise. Sounds hyperbole, but when you're drawing about 7,000 a game and you just trade basically your only decent player to the team you hate the most after winning a cup, it's enough to just kill a fanbase.
Yeah it is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan

26Mats

Registered User
Jun 23, 2018
33,357
25,749
Don't underrate how this will also destroy team morale, cementing us last place.
As an outsider, I can see how it would hurt to have Hertl traded to Vegas.

But aside from that, I think this could be a great trade. That Hertl contract could have become untradeable. Grier got you a 1st and a solid prospect. Plus it helps you bottom out and get really good prospects. You'll get a beauty this year (one of Cellebrini, Demidov, Lindstrom, Parekh, etc...)
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad