Towelie*
Guest
Zamboner said:There is no way anyone can say that Bertuzzi should be on that team over Eric Staal.
NO WAY
Who is saying that?
Zamboner said:There is no way anyone can say that Bertuzzi should be on that team over Eric Staal.
NO WAY
Comfortably Numb said:Who is saying that?
Comfortably Numb said:Who is saying that?
Comfortably Numb said:Never in my life has I seen someone state something so wrong so confidentally and so much. This is just plain wrong. The more you argue this, the more idiotic you appear.
Zamboner said:There is no way anyone can say that Bertuzzi should be on that team over Eric Staal.
NO WAY
Resolute said:Marcus Naslund.
parabola said:Staal Crosby and Spezza will have a very very good chance of being named to the 2010 team. This team wanted experience... By 2010 they will have that experience.
Bertuzzi will be a key part of the team and does indeed deserve to be there.
If you're gonna talk about being overated you should talk about Rick Nash. Who I do believe deserves to be on the team, but if you go by season stats then you don't include Nash (only played 5 games) ...
Point is, Bertuzzi has shown in the past the kind of player he can be (the kind of player that is very valuable). Hes gotten pretty much all of his form back... so you include him. Point production in the NHL isn't the deciding factor of being named to the team.
Resolute said:-----
The one thing I notice about Bertuzzi's numbers, is that he has completely disapeared off the map during powerplays. Almost to the point of being useless. When he had his great year and a half, he was scoring a ton of PP goals and points. Not so much the last two years. Hope Gretzky doesnt think Bertuzzi will be a good fit on either PP unit.
DR said:i would argue its the other way around. Naslund is nothing more than a euro scoring winger, it is Bertuzzi who creates the space in the offensive zone as well as taking the punishment in the crease.
When Bertuzzi isnt scoring, he is doing lots of other things to create scoring chances, especially in front of the net. When Naslund is not scoring, he is doing nothing else for the team.
44 is much more important to the Canucks than 19, so stuff your argument.
Look, I realize times are tough in East Van...but when you get a TV, watch some games, Bertuzzi is an damned good player.canuckers88 said:hahahaha Im sorry but players who can be considered BEST PLAYERS IN THE WORLD should play on a full sheet of ice and not half of it. Face it Bertuzzi is a one dimensional player - no wonder gretz likes him...mark my words - bertuzzi will cost canada.
canuckers88 said:Exactly which is why Bertuzzi doenst deserve to be there. Bad passes, giveaways, no concept of defense and floating. Thats the REAL Bertuzzi - he is the large version of Marc Savard.
Resolute said:Have to admit, I am surprised he matched Iginla in scoring last half of that season. Though, of course, it is important to note that while Bertuzzi had a great half season, Iginla was great the entire season.
The one thing I notice about Bertuzzi's numbers, is that he has completely disapeared off the map during powerplays. Almost to the point of being useless. When he had his great year and a half, he was scoring a ton of PP goals and points. Not so much the last two years. Hope Gretzky doesnt think Bertuzzi will be a good fit on either PP unit.
Resolute said:Yeah, you are right. Bertuzzi would have scored exactly as many points if he was playing with third and fourth liners instead of Marcus Naslund. How silly of me.![]()
-----
MS - Thanks. Nice to see there is one Vancouver fan who has more than "shut up, I'm right because I'm a Canucks fan."
Have to admit, I am surprised he matched Iginla in scoring last half of that season. Though, of course, it is important to note that while Bertuzzi had a great half season, Iginla was great the entire season.
The one thing I notice about Bertuzzi's numbers, is that he has completely disapeared off the map during powerplays. Almost to the point of being useless. When he had his great year and a half, he was scoring a ton of PP goals and points. Not so much the last two years. Hope Gretzky doesnt think Bertuzzi will be a good fit on either PP unit.
DR said:see, now we know you actually dont watch 44. he is used very often in front of the net to either tie up one (or two) of the dmen, to screen the goalie and to get the goalie all pissed off. many times, he will play a large role in a goal being scored and not register a point.
Steveorama said:Look, I realize times are tough in East Van...but when you get a TV, watch some games, Bertuzzi is an damned good player.
Gretzky was actually considered pretty good, too.
canuckers88 said:Exactly which is why Bertuzzi doenst deserve to be there. Bad passes, giveaways, no concept of defense and floating. Thats the REAL Bertuzzi - he is the large version of Marc Savard.
parabola said:Bertuzzi is good in front of the net, clearing space, can handle the puck without being thrown off it... I agree that Tuzzi on the Canucks would suck without Naslund... BUT on the Olympic team there are players he can play with that are just as good as Naslund. If Bertuzzi did not have a skilled player to play with, Bertuzzi would not be good on the team. Thankfully he has plenty, thus will be great for the team.
Hasbro said:I don't know I've seen that opinion out of a few Canucks fans.
MS said:When he was effective, Bertuzzi was allowed to battle head-to-head with defenders in front of the net. They whaled away on him, and he would push off on them to create space.
Then a couple coaches (Trotz in Nashville most notably after Bertuzzi embarassed a small Predator defense a few times) made a huge display out of how Bertuzzi was 'interfering' with his push-off move. The league, in turn, obviously told referees to crack down on it because all of a sudden he was getting penalties every time he pushed an opposing defender - penalties he never received before. In 03-04, it was absolutely ridiculous ... defenders could lumberjack him non-stop, basically cross-check him into the ice, but if he did anything to create space for himself it was an instant penalty. He became frustrated, lost confidence in things he was doing before, and IMO that was the biggest reason for his 03-04 struggles. He simply wasn't allowed to do the things on the PP that he'd been allowed to do before.
Resolute said:I did not say "politically correct" At least try to argue against what I'm actually saying.
You tell me. What has Bertuzzi done to deserve to be on this team?
He had one great season three years ago.
No international experience.
Was a major reason why the Canucks choked away a 3-1 lead to Minnesota.
I'm not even sure he has won at any level.
Has major league maturity issues, and is prone to taking stupid penalties at inopportune times.
Political reasons is the only plausable explanation for his inclusion. He's there because Gretzky wants to make a point about "moving on" and "forgiveness."
This team would have been much better off with Staal.
canuckers88 said:Agreed, but he still makes the bonehead decisions that can cost Canada - we arent playing the Blue Jackets anymore
canuckers88 said:Gretzky great passer, could put the puck in the net - thats about it, small, not physical, bad skater, no concept of defense.....
DR said:you forgot this smiley![]()
are you seriously arguing that 99 wasnt the greatest hockey player this world has ever seen?
ugh.