Toggle sidebar

Player Discussion Tim Stützle - L̶W̶/C - Part V

Status
Not open for further replies.
Frank8

Frank8

Registered User
Sep 19, 2013
700
310
Oscar The Grouch said:
Sensible fans always saw him as a 20G 50A type player in his prime.

Sensible fans did not change that projection when he made a fancy assist on that PP that one time.

Sensible fans have not changed that projection during his struggle to score early this season.

This board is like riding a rickety wooden roller coaster full of people you hate.
Click to expand...

Jimmy will be fine but sensible fans knew Raymond was the correct pick.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Adrianopolous

bicboi64

Registered User
Aug 13, 2020
5,412
3,515
Brampton
i wish he'd shoot more, dude has a lazer beam of a shot. Tried too many passes today and wanna see him rip it home
 
Tuna99

Tuna99

Registered User
Sep 26, 2009
15,908
7,877
TSN1200 talking about touches for goal scorers. Stuz does so much getting the puck up ice and into the zone, but getting him a player who can give him the puck back in the O-zone is What he needs to get going. Stuz doesn’t seem to get the puck back in dangerous spots ever, he always in the corners or on the boards. He should play with Brady because Brady sucks at getting the puck up ice but once he’s in the O-zone he is an underrated passer and a great playmaker - and of course the puck is usually in the slot or blue paint when Brady is involved and that hats where Stuz needs more touches

Tkachuk - Pinto - Stuz
Formy - Norris - Bath
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: TheDebater, Yak, Icelevel and 1 other person
Frank8

Frank8

Registered User
Sep 19, 2013
700
310
BradyTkachucky said:
Very real possibility. Stutzle over Raymond was a no brainer at the time, but Sandy over Drysdale remains to be seen.
Click to expand...
I really didn't want to drag up this debate but no, Stützle over Raymond was not a "no brainer". Raymond had the better pedigree and I can promise you Stevie would have picked the same player at 3. Stützle will be a very good player but like I said before the draft, the edge goes to Raymond.
 
Alf Silfversson

Alf Silfversson

Registered User
Jun 8, 2011
6,068
5,224
Imnotagoodposter said:
Man if Raymond ends up better than Stutzle and drysdale better than Sanderson I’ll be upset lol
Click to expand...

I had Raymond 3 over Stützle, but if he ends up slightly better than Stü that's not a big deal. After watching Stü for the last 70 games I'm confident he'll be a really good player (as long as his development isn't seriously messed with).

Similarly, I had Drysdale over Sanderson but no matter what happens I can't see Dry being THAT much better than Sanderson. He wasn't my pick but Sanderson is likely to be a very good player.

Now...if Sanderson and Stützle both end up busting (or close) and the other two end up being front line players then I'll be right there with you carrying a pitchfork. LOL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SENStastic, Alex1234 and bicboi64

bicboi64

Registered User
Aug 13, 2020
5,412
3,515
Brampton
Alf Silfversson said:
I had Raymond 3 over Stützle, but if he ends up slightly better than Stü that's not a big deal. After watching Stü for the last 70 games I'm confident he'll be a really good player (as long as his development isn't seriously messed with).

Similarly, I had Drysdale over Sanderson but no matter what happens I can't see Dry being THAT much better than Sanderson. He wasn't my pick but Sanderson is likely to be a very good player.

Now...if Sanderson and Stützle both end up busting (or close) and the other two end up being front line players then I'll be right there with you carrying a pitchfork. LOL.
Click to expand...

I didn't really have an opinion on Stu, I really wanted Byfield and was fine with our 3rd overall (figured it'd be either Stu or Holtz if we took a forward). But I was very high on Drysdale and was shocked that we didn't take him. I'm fine with Sanderson now and think he might be "the" guy if Chabot's back breaks in the next couple years. I was a bit disappointed with Jarventie and Kleven cuz I wanted JJ Peterka to play with Stu and Mysak cuz I thought he was awesome in the WJ's. Still 2020 is looking to be an exciting draft for us. Loving what we have in Sokolov so far
 
Blacephalon

Blacephalon

Registered User
Oct 12, 2018
1,165
1,382
Frank8 said:
I really didn't want to drag up this debate but no, Stützle over Raymond was not a "no brainer". Raymond had the better pedigree and I can promise you Stevie would have picked the same player at 3. Stützle will be a very good player but like I said before the draft, the edge goes to Raymond.
Click to expand...
That's your opinion, but majority of scouts had Stutzle ranked third
 
  • Like
Reactions: BradyTkachucky
Alf Silfversson

Alf Silfversson

Registered User
Jun 8, 2011
6,068
5,224
bicboi64 said:
I didn't really have an opinion on Stu, I really wanted Byfield and was fine with our 3rd overall (figured it'd be either Stu or Holtz if we took a forward). But I was very high on Drysdale and was shocked that we didn't take him. I'm fine with Sanderson now and think he might be "the" guy if Chabot's back breaks in the next couple years. I was a bit disappointed with Jarventie and Kleven cuz I wanted JJ Peterka to play with Stu and Mysak cuz I thought he was awesome in the WJ's. Still 2020 is looking to be an exciting draft for us. Loving what we have in Sokolov so far
Click to expand...

I was definitely OK with Stü. I also wanted Byfield and Drysdale. My ideal draft would have been Byfield and Raymond, but neither were really available. I'm happy with what we got at the top of the draft.

I also like Greig to an extent, and I was happy with the Jarventie pick. To me he has the upside to be a 30 goal scorer, something we lack. After that it fell apart for me. Kleven is a typical 2nd round prospect but I would have NEVER given up two seconds(essentially) for a guy who realistically will never be more than a 3rd pairing guy. You can get established but still young enough 2nd pairing guys for that during many offseasons.

And I love Soklov as a person but I didn't like that pick. He's starting to win me over but I think he's still a ways from being an NHL player. Hopefully he gets there. I think we did a mediocre job with that draft but only time will tell.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bicboi64
Wallet Inspector

Wallet Inspector

Registered User
Jan 19, 2013
6,286
5,816
Frank8 said:
I really didn't want to drag up this debate but no, Stützle over Raymond was not a "no brainer". Raymond had the better pedigree and I can promise you Stevie would have picked the same player at 3. Stützle will be a very good player but like I said before the draft, the edge goes to Raymond.
Click to expand...
lol, by all accounts Stevie Y was super high on Stutzle. I think I even read he considered taking him #1 if Detroit ended up winning the pick.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SENStastic, ReginKarlssonLehner and Icelevel
Yak

Yak

Registered User
Jun 30, 2009
3,619
2,574
Los Angeles
www.androidheadlines.com
First off I am a huge BT fan, I would love to see Timmy, Norris and Bath for a while. Timmy can't be playing with scrubs and needs to play with scores and play makers.

Is not like we are going to the playoffs this year we.need to be trying new lines. I know DJ is desperate for wins but his lack experimenting holds us back specially on defense.
 
JimmyApples

JimmyApples

Registered User
Sep 24, 2021
3,822
3,880
Stützle has a real bad case of being snake bitten. You know when he scores one, they’re going to all start coming. He’s been our best forward so far, IMO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yak
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Latest posts

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

Top Bottom
X