Proposal: Three Way Trade between ANA, WPG, and NYR

Hunter368

RIP lomiller1, see you in the next life buddy.
Nov 8, 2011
27,408
24,576
Fowler would be Winnipeg's top LD...by far. Skjei would push Enstrom for playing time.

The absence of a true top pairing lhd doesn't make a 2nd pairing guy a top pairing guy.

Zero interest in two years of Fowler

Skjei isn't even a NHL player yet, safe to say he wouldn't be pushing Toby for anything unless you mean pushing Toby for his autograph.
 

TheTakedown

Puck is Life
Jul 11, 2012
13,689
1,480
The absence of a true top pairing lhd doesn't make a 2nd pairing guy a top pairing guy.

Zero interest in two years of Fowler

Skjei isn't even a NHL player yet, safe to say he wouldn't be pushing Toby for anything unless you mean pushing Toby for his autograph.

Unfortunately, that's all that's on the market right now. Nobody wants to part with the direct LHD equivalent of Trouba because they want that player on their team.

Which means WPG needs to either a) trade Trouba to solidify a different weakness on their team, b) lower their demands for Trouba if they insist on a LHD, or c) do nothing and pray trouba signs (doubtful at this point)--the longer Chevy sits on Trouba, the lower his value is going to be when he is finally traded.

I'm not saying Skjei is the answer, but if WPG wants direct equal value, the best they will get RIGHT NOW would be both Fowler AND Skjei--Fowler for short term #1LHD duties, and Skjei for long term #1LHD duties
 

Spazkat

Registered User
Feb 19, 2015
4,362
2,277
That's true, but I give OP benefit of doubt short term that can be managed.
However, if we are giving up Miller +, I want Hanifin and his ELC coming back.

Are you talking about a whole different trade involving Carolina or is there a 2nd Hanifin brother that the Jets have that I missed somehow.
 

WesMcCauley

Registered User
Apr 24, 2015
8,616
2,600
Are you talking about a whole different trade involving Carolina or is there a 2nd Hanifin brother that the Jets have that I missed somehow.

No reason to try to talk trades with Bern. He is all over the place and LOVE young first round picks that are hyped up
 

Static

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 28, 2006
49,417
37,782
SoCal
It's concerning that Ranger fans don't seem all that bothered with giving up Miller. I think Anaheim could do better.
 

WesMcCauley

Registered User
Apr 24, 2015
8,616
2,600
It's concerning that Ranger fans don't seem all that bothered with giving up Miller. I think Anaheim could do better.

We dont want to give him up at all but our defense sucks and we have to move a young forward with offensive upside and top 6/top line potential to start the conversation. Its that simple really. We have a very deep offensive group which makes it less of a problem
 

SEALBound

Fancy Gina Carano
Sponsor
Jun 13, 2010
42,825
21,687
Neutral fan, value wise it's not bad. Don't know about cap though.
 

Ducks in a row

Go Ducks Quack Quack
Dec 17, 2013
18,072
4,461
U.S.A.
WPG: Trouba
&
Thorburn

ANH: Fowler
&
Ritchie
&
2nd or 3rd

We are not trading Ritchie our top forward prospect. Trouba wants to get paid more then Fowler makes and we need to improve our cap situation not make it worse this is just terrible for the Ducks.
 

Gump Hasek

Spleen Merchant
Nov 9, 2005
10,167
2
222 Tudor Terrace
All of these 3-way proposals where a third team tries to acquire Trouba by facilitating a move for Fowler are essentially a dime a dozen on this board. The logic doesn't fly, and it has already been proposed a myriad of times, FYI.

If Winnipeg wanted Fowler, they would have traded for him by now, as they have the required ammo to do so due a vast wealth of assets and they don't need to include a third team as such. They could then trade Trouba at their whim. It hasn't happened because they likely don't want him. The Jets are currently running 21 y/o rookie Josh Morrissey in their top pair at LD and he is the least of their concerns as his play has been outstanding. There is no need for the Jets to move for Fowler at the cost of Trouba.
 

Zegs2sendhelp

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2012
42,769
39,729
WPG: Trouba
&
Thorburn

ANH: Fowler
&
Ritchie
&
2nd or 3rd


Fowler and trouba are pretty much equals... with the exceptions of contracts and honestly id rather have fowler. Ritchie > thorburn ... idk why the 2nd or 3rd are in there.
 

Zegs2sendhelp

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2012
42,769
39,729
All of these 3-way proposals where a third team tries to acquire Trouba by facilitating a move for Fowler are essentially a dime a dozen on this board. The logic doesn't fly, and it has already been proposed a myriad of times, FYI.

If Winnipeg wanted Fowler, they would have traded for him by now, as they have the required ammo to do so due a vast wealth of assets and they don't need to include a third team as such. They could then trade Trouba at their whim. It hasn't happened because they likely don't want him. The Jets are currently running 21 y/o rookie Josh Morrissey in their top pair at LD and he is the least of their concerns as his play has been outstanding. There is no need for the Jets to move for Fowler at the cost of Trouba.

Not to be that guy but you guys are giving up 4.00 goals a game... I think your defense could certainly be helped.


Granted there is no need for the ducks to trade fowler for trouba, trouba doesn't make us a better team, id rather just play Theodore and Larsson and move fowler for a forward piece if we had to move him.
 

Gump Hasek

Spleen Merchant
Nov 9, 2005
10,167
2
222 Tudor Terrace
Not to be that guy but you guys are giving up 4.00 goals a game... I think your defense could certainly be helped.


Not to be that guy, but the Jets are currently running with two largely inexperienced goalies whose play has been pedestrian thus far, and unless Folwer is willing to strap on the goal pads and can beat them out, he still isn't needed here. Their play may yet improve, and all the Jets truly need right now is a couple more saves per game from their goalies.
 

Zegs2sendhelp

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2012
42,769
39,729
Not to be that guy, but the Jets are currently running with two inexperienced goalies whose play has been pedestrian thus far, and unless Folwer is willing to strap on the goal pads then he still isn't needed here.

Looks like you guys could really use any one, an experienced 24 year old dmen who plays top pairing on a very solid defensive club would def help you guys... def more then troubla is now, and honestly fowler would be an improvement over most of your dmen, at least in the defensive zone.
 

Gump Hasek

Spleen Merchant
Nov 9, 2005
10,167
2
222 Tudor Terrace
Looks like you guys could really use any one, an experienced 24 year old dmen who plays top pairing on a very solid defensive club would def help you guys... def more then troubla is now, and honestly fowler would be an improvement over most of your dmen, at least in the defensive zone.

The only weak play right now is from the bottom pair D, FYI. The forwards also need to tighten up their defensive play at times, and that is a function of youth versus a lack of talent. They'll be fine. It certainly doesn't warrant trading Trouba to downgrade to Fowler.
 

drw02

Registered User
Aug 10, 2013
5,736
973
All of these 3-way proposals where a third team tries to acquire Trouba by facilitating a move for Fowler are essentially a dime a dozen on this board. The logic doesn't fly, and it has already been proposed a myriad of times, FYI.

If Winnipeg wanted Fowler, they would have traded for him by now, as they have the required ammo to do so due a vast wealth of assets and they don't need to include a third team as such. They could then trade Trouba at their whim. It hasn't happened because they likely don't want him. The Jets are currently running 21 y/o rookie Josh Morrissey in their top pair at LD and he is the least of their concerns as his play has been outstanding. There is no need for the Jets to move for Fowler at the cost of Trouba.

Maybe the Jets don't want to trade one of their young stud forwards for Fowler. Your prospects won't get it done, Ducks would probably want Ehlers or Connor+ and Chevy probably doesn't wanna move those guys. But if another team surrenders the forward(s) the Ducks desire to acquire Fowler, then a Fowler+ for Trouba could make a lot of sense for Chevy.
 

Hunter368

RIP lomiller1, see you in the next life buddy.
Nov 8, 2011
27,408
24,576
Zero interest in this whole idea of Fowler for Trouba. Jets aren't taking 50 cents on the dollar return for Trouba. Just stop with this Fowler to the Jets nonsense
 

Emerald Duck

Registered User
Dec 9, 2009
1,700
209
Arrowhead Pond of Anaheim, CA
What is the most recent contract demand from Trouba's camp ?

A lot of these hypothetical trades involving Trouba are based on him just wanting to get out of WPG and back to playing on the right side. However, if he is looking for an Ekblad contract too, then his trade value drops quite a bit.

I'd rather move Vatanen to NYR anyways for Miller+. We can replace his skillset more easily than Fowler. The recent signing of Vatanen to a new contract may represent a hurdle for Murray, but certainly we can get more value for a signed-Vatanen then if we tried to trade him as an RFA during the offseason.
 

Zegs2sendhelp

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2012
42,769
39,729
Except at hockey, where Trouba is much, much better. Fowler wouldn't come close to getting Trouba. Please stop trying to push him on the Jets. They don't want or need him.

I don't want to move fowler... specially not for trouba... I think you missed that point.

Fowler has been our best player so far this year, he is playing 25 mins a game as our #1 dmen... has 4 points in 5 games and playing great defense, very noticeable all over the rink.


Right now trouba wouldn't get you fowler, and honestly we don't need trouba we got good dmen in our system.
 

Zegs2sendhelp

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2012
42,769
39,729
The only weak play right now is from the bottom pair D, FYI. The forwards also need to tighten up their defensive play at times, and that is a function of youth versus a lack of talent. They'll be fine. It certainly doesn't warrant trading Trouba to downgrade to Fowler.

Trouba is what a #3? fowler is playing as a #1 its an upgrade right now... granted I wouldn't see it worth it from a ducks perspective to trade fowler for someone that'll make more and do less.
 

Hunter368

RIP lomiller1, see you in the next life buddy.
Nov 8, 2011
27,408
24,576
What is the most recent contract demand from Trouba's camp ?

A lot of these hypothetical trades involving Trouba are based on him just wanting to get out of WPG and back to playing on the right side. However, if he is looking for an Ekblad contract too, then his trade value drops quite a bit.

I'd rather move Vatanen to NYR anyways for Miller+. We can replace his skillset more easily than Fowler. The recent signing of Vatanen to a new contract may represent a hurdle for Murray, but certainly we can get more value for a signed-Vatanen then if we tried to trade him as an RFA during the offseason.

No one knows the true contract demands. All we know is no contract with even discussed with the Jets and the agent saying it's not about money. Market is well set for a player like Trouba, so you can assume Trouba will land between 5-5.75 mil per year for roughly 6 years IMO
 

Ad

Latest posts

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad