brakeyawself
Registered User
- Oct 5, 2006
- 1,600
- 943
Chytil as the second line center is an absolute joke. No one is fixing this team until we get an upgrade at the center position. After last season it convinced me this team can't compete with the good teams until we upgraded from Strome and Chytil and nothing has changed my opinion during the first dozen games this year. No grit and no quickness. The forecheck is an absolute joke as well. And moving Kreider to the 3rd line when he has been only one of a handfull producing is not a good idea.
I think Drury has done a terrible job so far facilitating the moves the Rangers actually need as opposed to what Drury seems to think they should have. Feel like the only moves he has made, anyone could have made and I am not even sure if he optimized those assets.
We should have all ready traded at least one of our young D's for an equivalent young center. This should have all ready taken place. Now, players we possibly could have gotten at a cheaper price, like Kupari or Rasmussen, are starting to show their potential at the NHL level, making it far less likely they could be acquired at good value if at all. I think Nashville brought in a good reclamation project in Logan Brown. Why didn't Drury do that? Othmann was a good pick even if I would have preferred a center there. But then when a few really good center prospects fell into the 2nd, other teams traded into acquire them, but not the Rangers. Thinking of Pinelli and Raty mostly. Stankoven and Braz to some extent.
He trades away Buch, our best RW who would still be our best RW and manages to ruin the team's relationship with one of it's highest offensive ceiling young wingers in Kravtsov. At a time when neither Laf or Kakko have proven they will be the answer. And while I think Blais has been a good acquisition, he'd be a better acquisition if a 1st round pick instead of a 2nd was attached to him. Or, if we didn't trade Buch for him, but someone else. And yea, I know Buch was likely out regardless. But I don't really buy the reasoning behind that. Especially after seeing the contract he signed with the Blues. He's cheaper than Kreider.
Yet he brings in Goodrow, Blais, Hunt and Reaves because of one circumstance of Tom Wilson having his way with the team? Like we needed all 4 of those guys. 2 at most would have been enough, but no, we needed 4 of them. When we all ready had Rooney, Gauthier and Barron almost ready to contribute.
And sure, Kreider has been productive. But I wouldn't expect that to last if history is anything to go by. He's always been streaky and offensively inconsistent. Ideally, he'd be a 3rd liner. The fact that he's a top 6 forward on this team is more a product of the rest of the team just not producing and less about Kreider having a good run of games.