Drury and Gallant were not and are not the answers. Drury is still a rookie GM, seemingly obsessed with "grit" over talent. And Gallant, for a guy with his reputation, it's very very strange that his first 3 NHL head coaching jobs all ended the same way; not being able to make it through his 3rd full season with any team he has been with. Two of those teams playoff bound and "winning". Once or twice, maybe a coincidence. But 3 times in a row? That tells me more about him than all the other narratives and hype.
Drury and Gallant came in with this "win now" mentality, for a team that is clearly still developing. And I think the changes that have been made are only hindering the development of the players we need to develop. Bringing in all 4 of Blais, Goodrow, Reaves and Hunt was completely unnecessary. Especially when we all ready had Rooney, Gauthier and Barron nearing ready. 2 of those former 4 would have been more than enough "grit", but not for Drury.
These types of acquisitions are the "finishing touches" for a team that is ready to contend. Not the choices of a team clearly still developing. The Kravtsov situation is a prime example. And yea, I get WHY Buch was traded, but I still don't have to like it. Even if Blais has been relatively good so far.
But I think this year, from the very start, should have had Kravtsov, Barron, Jones and Lundkvist all on the roster. And they should have been getting these guys used to the NHL and playing with one another, without damaging anyone's development. And without all this pressure put on Laf and Kakko now. Who I think both at least need another season or two before they feasibly reach their potential. IF they reach their potential at all. But I don't think the changes made to the team, the construction of the roster and the tactics brought in by Gallant are helping at all with player development. Even Chytil looks to have regressed since last season.
For all the crap Gorton and JD got, they actually did a very good job drafting, aside from drafting centers for whatever reason. And aside from the Kreider contract and Trouba acquisition, I don't think they did a terrible job managing the Rangers assets either. Frankly, I think they were prematurely sacked and I think the narratives and negative hype surrounding them both was completely off the mark. I think just comparing what Drury has done in his brief time, to what JD and Gorton did, I would take Gorton and JD any day over Drury right now.
Now Quinn, that's a different story. I didn't quite like how he manged this team either. But looking at Gallant now, I am kind of thinking we didn't have it quite so bad under Quinn. At least he seemed to understand where this team was in their development and that they were still a year or two away from actually contending.
I will be shocked if Gallant makes it through his 3rd season with the Rangers. Fully expect that career pattern to continue for him. And I don't understand at all the love Gallant gets and got as a head coach. He's proven absolutely nothing in like 9 years with 3 different teams. I think all the hype surrounding him is solely based on him "turning the Panthers around", which was nice, but I think a totally different situation that he has with the Rangers. And really the one bright spot in his NHL coaching career. And sure, he was good in the Q...... for whatever that is worth.
And I am not sure what kind of leash Drury is on, I expect he will get at least 3 seasons, but I am really, really not optimistic given what he has done so far since becoming GM.