FLYguy3911
Sanheim Lover
- Oct 19, 2006
- 55,590
- 92,151
So a dysfunctional origination with no real direction is what your saying?A decade of mediocrity.
Holmgren blew two chances to rebuild properly, once after the Carter/Richards trades, once after 2018-19. Instead he hired CF and told him to "win now."
Hextall started a rebuild at the 2015 TDL, then stalled, then traded Schenn in the summer of 2017, then stalled, then got fired.
Barber was Scott's chief advisor.
Clarke was the puppet master.
Why not Walker and 3rd/4th for a 1st?They'll settle for something like a 2nd and 4th.
But Briere doesn't bid against himself, there's no reason to lower your price until someone makes a serious counter offer.
"Market value" is what the market pays.
Ghost was not a 1st and 2nd pair D-man at that point, he played that role in Arizona b/c the other D-men were injured or worse, he's been a 3rd D-man in Carolina and Detroit (15:09 at ES, 5th on the team, 11 seconds a game more than Maatta).
He was a cap dump in the sense that LA retained on Provorov to make him palatable to CBJ, then the Flyers took Walker to match that retention. From the Flyer perspective, he was a no cost addition since he allowed them to dump Provorov's contract and preserve the retention slot.
So a dysfunctional origination with no real direction is what your saying?
Barber has no skin in it, if Scott listened to him than that is on Scott and Scott only. Clarke still gets blame for the last decade of ineptitude? Guess he is a good fall back for some to blame.
Does Chuck Fletcher get any blame?
Why not Walker and 3rd/4th for a 1st?
They'll settle for something like a 2nd and 4th.
But Briere doesn't bid against himself, there's no reason to lower your price until someone makes a serious counter offer.
"Briere is going to bid against himself.
But also, Briere doesn't bid against himself"
You're hilarious. You can't be serious.
Clarke was the one behind hiring Fletcher.So a dysfunctional origination with no real direction is what your saying?
Barber has no skin in it, if Scott listened to him than that is on Scott and Scott only. Clarke still gets blame for the last decade of ineptitude? Guess he is a good fall back for some to blame.
Does Chuck Fletcher get any blame?
Why not Walker and 3rd/4th for a 1st?
As a baseline, any trade that is net-negative for total assets is not ideal for a rebuilding* team.Why not Walker and 3rd/4th for a 1st?
After years of arguing against this, it’s nice to see you acknowledge it.Clarke was the one behind hiring Fletcher.
Walker and ??? for a 1st depends on finding a team willing to trade a 1st.
Same with landing a top prospect.
Going through Wheeler's farm system reviews, the worst 9 teams so far are mostly SC contenders - the most likely candidates to pay through the nose.
I do not necessary agree with that as we all know 1st rd picks have a higher rate to be an NHL player.As a baseline, any trade that is net-negative for total assets is not ideal for a rebuilding* team.
*This regime still needs to prove they are committed to a rebuild.
The point is that if they have to add to Walker to get a first, like in your example, then they should be targeting at least as many assets coming back. Try to get a second draft pick instead of settling for just the 1st.I do not necessary agree with that as we all know 1st rd picks have a higher rate to be an NHL player.
Agree on the rebuild part.
If the option was Walker for a 2nd and 4thThe point is that if they have to add to Walker to get a first, like in your example, then they should be targeting at least as many assets coming back. Try to get a second draft pick instead of settling for just the 1st.
Volume of draft picks is an underappreciated art in the NHL.
So far, Briere has added 1st, (2) 2nds, 5th, 6th, Grans (21)
Not a bad start, considering he's been on the job for less than a year.A treasure trove indeed.
Clarke was the one behind hiring Fletcher.
Volume is necessary. Just look at the Flyers 2nd round pick the last 6-7 years. Lots of nothing...The point is that if they have to add to Walker to get a first, like in your example, then they should be targeting at least as many assets coming back. Try to get a second draft pick instead of settling for just the 1st.
Volume of draft picks is an underappreciated art in the NHL.
I've been brainwashed by this board. Waterboarding and other techniques.Well this was not what I ever expected to read. What made you change your mind?
Poitras is out five months with shoulder surgery for Boston.Sergachev looks to be badly hurt. If Tampa wanted a D before , they for sure do now.
8. Philadelphia can extend Travis Konecny on July 1, but the Flyers are trying to get the legwork done sooner. You’re going to see a real attempt at this. The prediction is Nick Seeler stays, and Jamie Drysdale’s arrival puts Sean Walker on the move (Edmonton and Tampa Bay are among interested parties). Rasmus Ristolainen’s stock is up, but the contract is tricky.
9. That brings us to Scott Laughton. The first-rounders going for rental centres have GMs thinking. If you’re Pat Verbeek (Adam Henrique), you’re smiling at the market, with several teams looking for middlemen. (The Rangers are looking for two of them. Going to be watching Tyler Johnson, now off injured reserve.) What that’s also done is bring out the managers who have a centre with term. Those include Nic Dowd and Laughton. The latter’s down three minutes a game from last year, and is at his lowest playing time in four seasons. If that’s the future, a move is better for everyone. I would expect teams to call on Boone Jenner, for the same reason. But he’s got a partial no-trade and you can’t see Columbus doing it without a massive return.