Hollywood Cannon
I'm Away From My Desk
The level of intentional dishonesty is astounding.
Remember when you insinuated yesterday that "The Flyers didn't hire outside execs because they can't do it before the draft"? You ready to admit that was BS yet?Only if he leaves Carolina and comes here, in which case his success will be due to Waddell and Tulsky, and his failure to advance in the playoffs demonstrates the futility of hiring an ex-Flyer.
6 of 16 seasons is the "majority" of a career? Briere played for five different teams and I think at least 6 different HCs.
Rod Brind’Amour played in Philly for 9 years & over 600 games.
By the logic used on this board, he must suck.
The only executives available before July 1 are those fired or those whose teams are planning to fire/not rehire AND give permission for them to talk to other teams. The less senior personnel probably aren't available period, who is going to let their head of amateur scouting or their top scouts talk to other teams before the draft?Remember when you insinuated yesterday that "The Flyers didn't hire outside execs because they can't do it before the draft"? You ready to admit that was BS yet?
The only executives available before July 1 are those fired or those whose teams are planning to fire/not rehire AND give permission for them to talk to other teams. The less senior personnel probably aren't available period, who is going to let their head of amateur scouting or their top scouts talk to other teams before the draft?
Do you really want to go through this whole song and dance again where I have to ask you questions so basic they verge on condescending that lead up to you admitting this team chose not to look outside the organization on purpose when hiring the GM, or do you want to save us both the time and effort and admit maybe "not being able to interview executives outside the organization before the draft" was said to make it seem like they had no choice but to promote Briere and is yet another attempt at a (not so) thinly veiled defence of the actions of this organization no matter what?The only executives available before July 1 are those fired or those whose teams are planning to fire/not rehire AND give permission for them to talk to other teams. The less senior personnel probably aren't available period, who is going to let their head of amateur scouting or their top scouts talk to other teams before the draft?
Who do you think he is most identified with?
I’m going to guess the team he re-joined in an executive role the second he retired. Where he has spent 8 years drawing from the well of knowledge that is Holmgren and friends.
But it could be the Coyotes.
A most excellent President of Hockey Propaganda.I enjoyed it, Jones is just an amazing interview/talker. It's worth a listen
They were set on Briere, it was obvious they were grooming him, first a minor league management position where he learned the nuts and bolts about running an organization, then a stint at Wharton where he polished the skills he'd need, such as negotiation. Finally, an assistant position where he was able to spend a year observing and talking to different people in the FO, evaluating FO personnel and procedures.Do you really want to go through this whole song and dance again where I have to ask you questions so basic they verge on condescending that lead up to you admitting this team chose not to look outside the organization on purpose when hiring the GM, or do you want to save us both the time and effort and admit maybe "not being able to interview executives outside the organization before the draft" was said to make it seem like they had no choice but to promote Briere and is yet another attempt at a (not so) thinly veiled defence of the actions of this organization no matter what?
Why am I even bothering replying to you, having discussions with you is a waste of time. You're right DH, the Flyers had no choice but to promote Briere, there were literally no other options available. Glory to the Flyers Regime.
Kumbaya.
They were set on Briere, it was obvious they were grooming him, first a minor league management position where he learned the nuts and bolts about running an organization, then a stint at Wharton where he polished the skills he'd need, such as negotiation. Finally, an assistant position where he was able to spend a year observing and talking to different people in the FO, evaluating FO personnel and procedures.
After 16 years as a player, much like Sakic and Yzerman, he didn't need to be taught about "hockey," he needed to learn the nuts and bolts of management, from analytics (nothing special about hockey analytics, just applied statistics), to finance, marketing, organization to handling people. Meanwhile, the Comcast people got to observe him and see if he was a viable candidate.
Maybe they're right, maybe they're wrong, looking at GMs around the league, there is no pattern that predicts success.
Once Briere and Torts were in place, and working well together, the President search was limited to those who could work within this structure, excluding any who wanted to impose their vision on the organization.
Yeah, I'm not reading that.They were set on Briere, it was obvious they were grooming him, first a minor league management position where he learned the nuts and bolts about running an organization, then a stint at Wharton where he polished the skills he'd need, such as negotiation. Finally, an assistant position where he was able to spend a year observing and talking to different people in the FO, evaluating FO personnel and procedures.
After 16 years as a player, much like Sakic and Yzerman, he didn't need to be taught about "hockey," he needed to learn the nuts and bolts of management, from analytics (nothing special about hockey analytics, just applied statistics), to finance, marketing, organization to handling people. Meanwhile, the Comcast people got to observe him and see if he was a viable candidate.
Maybe they're right, maybe they're wrong, looking at GMs around the league, there is no pattern that predicts success.
Once Briere and Torts were in place, and working well together, the President search was limited to those who could work within this structure, excluding any who wanted to impose their vision on the organization.
that stint i believe was a 6 week certificate course.They were set on Briere, it was obvious they were grooming him, first a minor league management position where he learned the nuts and bolts about running an organization, then a stint at Wharton where he polished the skills he'd need, such as negotiation. Finally, an assistant position where he was able to spend a year observing and talking to different people in the FO, evaluating FO personnel and procedures.
After 16 years as a player, much like Sakic and Yzerman, he didn't need to be taught about "hockey," he needed to learn the nuts and bolts of management, from analytics (nothing special about hockey analytics, just applied statistics), to finance, marketing, organization to handling people. Meanwhile, the Comcast people got to observe him and see if he was a viable candidate.
Maybe they're right, maybe they're wrong, looking at GMs around the league, there is no pattern that predicts success.
Once Briere and Torts were in place, and working well together, the President search was limited to those who could work within this structure, excluding any who wanted to impose their vision on the organization.
Has Tulsky been offered a job yet?Man, I didn't realize MacKinnon, Tulsky, Darche, and Botterill were all getting let go this summer. I wonder where they'll end up after their inevitable firings, since they all interviewed in Pittsburgh and teams only allow that if they're not bringing those execs back.
Has Tulsky been offered a job yet?
Probably the Avalanche and Joe Sakic.I’m going to guess the team he re-joined in an executive role the second he retired. Where he has spent 8 years drawing from the well of knowledge that is Holmgren and friends.
But it could be the Coyotes.
A most excellent President of Hockey Propaganda.
Is being set on a single guy trained by fossils who suck at management good?
Fair enough. Can’t defend the org lol - I genuinely mean that. But I do like Jones as a talker, his honesty can be refreshing
Has he not been offered a job?Has Tulsky been offered a job yet?