The state of the Habs Rebuild - The Next step

What note you give to Kent Hughes' Rebuild? ?

  • A

    Votes: 206 51.9%
  • B

    Votes: 143 36.0%
  • C

    Votes: 39 9.8%
  • D

    Votes: 3 0.8%
  • E

    Votes: 1 0.3%
  • F

    Votes: 9 2.3%

  • Total voters
    397

teamfirst

Registered User
Oct 28, 2016
3,787
2,490
the most important factor is it's still VERY early.

But how much early......that is the question, how many years before being able to assess if you hired the right guy.......same thing goes for the coaches, cuz apparently we can't decide if MSL is the right guy cuz you know.....REBUILD
 
  • Like
Reactions: 417

417

When the going gets tough...
Feb 20, 2003
52,449
30,284
Ottawa
But how much early......that is the question, how many years before being able to assess if you hired the right guy.......same thing goes for the coaches, cuz apparently we can't decide if MSL is the right guy cuz you know.....REBUILD
Well I think at the conclusion of this season will be an important performance indicator.

They stated they wanted to progress, so you can measure how this season went against last year where progress wasn't as important of a factor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: themilosh

Grate n Colorful Oz

The Hutson Hawk
Jun 12, 2007
36,198
34,339
Hockey Mecca
PR or not, I think it's perfectly reasonable because I also wanted the Habs to play meaningful games past the Trade Deadline. To me, not being functionally eliminated from the playoffs before the New Year and not mathematically eliminated until April are important milestones.


I edited my comment after posting to specifically concede the point. Calma, calma.

You didn't respond to my lengthy reply a few days ago to not so subtly avoid your own concession. We notice.

I didn't read nor answer because it was too damn long and we were going around in circle. Don't pretend to know what a non response is about. You aren't inside my head.
 

Boss Man Hughes

Registered User
Mar 15, 2022
17,267
11,812
Giving Mtb a 3 year contract was a sign of at least tanking until that contract ends (as it ends with Gallagher and the rest of Bergevin's mess-ups).
No it was not. Monty played well last season and I am sure they expected him to be a decent # 1. Still to be determined if he is.
 

Mrb1p

PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
Dec 10, 2011
91,364
58,457
Citizen of the world
The next step is in the Habs rebuild is getting rid of the good ol' country club.

Martin needs to leave.
Matheson needs to leave.
Dvorak needs to leave.
Gally needs to leave.
Anderson needs to leave.
Cole, Nick, Slaf, and all the other youngsters need to fall in line.

We need to see a team that is well-run. Not another Maple Leafs fiasco, right now that's how the Habs are playing.

Effort needs to be demanded.
Shifts need to be shorter and more meaningful. No more coasting, and this starts with Matheson and Nick.
Accountability needs to be a paragon.
Vets can't be allowed to make incessant mistakes because "They're playing too much".

I want this team to be the 08 Red Wings and not the 2020 Maple Leafs. There's very little difference in the make up of both teams, both were made up of highly skilled forward, I guess it's hard to compare Nick Lidstrom though, and mid-pack goaltenders, but the way they addressed hockey game was much different.

Matheson's never played longer shifts than he ever did here with the Habs, thats also one of the reasons why he's god-awful. 1:02 Average shift this year. That's way too high, especially for the quality of player he is.
 

Miller Time

Registered User
Sep 16, 2004
24,191
17,040
I'm not sure how you came out with this only in all I wrote. Good job.

your assessment was based on an obviously flawed premise... I quoted the most glaringly incoherent statement, one which exposes how poor the entire take was.

If you can't understand the impact that a player of Lidstrom's caliber has on a contending team, I wonder if you understand much of anything about hockey :dunno:
 

Mrb1p

PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
Dec 10, 2011
91,364
58,457
Citizen of the world
your assessment was based on an obviously flawed premise... I quoted the most glaringly incoherent statement, one which exposes how poor the entire take was.

If you can't understand the impact that a player of Lidstrom's caliber has on a contending team, I wonder if you understand much of anything about hockey :dunno:
Yeah, yeah.
 

Kobe Armstrong

Registered User
Jul 26, 2011
15,592
6,545
A Matheson trade would make for a good shakeup and bring some more respect back to Hughes IMO

Capitalize on Matheson's value being high, take away Marty's favorite toy, trade from a position of strength, show some balls by trading away a member of the Quartexx club, send a message to the room by trading a well-respected Vet
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Gr8 Dane

HabsCode

Registered User
Feb 10, 2019
3,134
3,669
A Matheson trade would make for a good shakeup and bring some more respect back to Hughes IMO

Capitalize on Matheson's value being high, take away Marty's favorite toy, trade from a position of strength, show some balls by trading away a member of the Quartexx club, send a message to the room by trading a well-respected Vet
You forgot: Assure yourself of picking top 3!
 

themilosh

Registered User
Sponsor
Apr 27, 2015
3,170
2,659
Oakville, ON
your assessment was based on an obviously flawed premise... I quoted the most glaringly incoherent statement, one which exposes how poor the entire take was.

If you can't understand the impact that a player of Lidstrom's caliber has on a contending team, I wonder if you understand much of anything about hockey :dunno:
You calling a fellow poster's post as "glaringly incoherent" never works to find decent conversation.

We all have our preferences- at this point none are wrong..
 

themilosh

Registered User
Sponsor
Apr 27, 2015
3,170
2,659
Oakville, ON
Absolutely agree. And another poster said, he's a coaster. You'll also see very few players backcheck as casually or get to the bench so slowly to allow fresh legs to get on the ice
I like Suzuki but he's always struck me as a Dylan Larkin type.. too clean, not gritty enough to make a difference. This is why Detroit is in quicksand.. the entire roster us made up of smallish, soft forwards.. this never works if the Cup is the true objective.. if we can bottom out this year, and pick up Hagens, id feel a gell of alot more secure with our top 6. As if now, we are a weak, soft team..
 

417

When the going gets tough...
Feb 20, 2003
52,449
30,284
Ottawa
The next step is in the Habs rebuild is getting rid of the good ol' country club.

Martin needs to leave.
Matheson needs to leave.
Dvorak needs to leave.
Gally needs to leave.
Anderson needs to leave.
Cole, Nick, Slaf, and all the other youngsters need to fall in line.
MSL might not be the coach this team needs when it's ready to take the next step, but he's not going anywhere for now, he's growing as a coach much like the team is.

Matheson is going to get moved at some point in the next 15 months, patience.

Dvorak is going to move before this trade deadline, patience

Gallagher & Anderson, their contracts are too difficult to move and Hughes isn't taking a L just to move both players, especially not right now given they've been 2 of the more consistent players this season. if the team was actually good, then you might have a point that they "need to leave", but they're not good, so trading them at a cost to the Habs AND continuing to suck, doesn't fix anything but make you feel better that the team got rid of players you don't like.

Cole, Nick and Slaf are very much like the coach, growing, you need to stop accelerating their timeline because you're impatient.
We need to see a team that is well-run. Not another Maple Leafs fiasco, right now that's how the Habs are playing.

Effort needs to be demanded.
Shifts need to be shorter and more meaningful. No more coasting, and this starts with Matheson and Nick.
Accountability needs to be a paragon.
Vets can't be allowed to make incessant mistakes because "They're playing too much".
One day Matheson won't be on this team anymore, and I can't wait to see who the next player to get under your skin will be lol.

I gotta give it to you, you're consistent/persistent with your posts lol.
 
Last edited:

morhilane

Registered User
Feb 28, 2021
8,808
11,421
Absolutely agree. And another poster said, he's a coaster. You'll also see very few players backcheck as casually or get to the bench so slowly to allow fresh legs to get on the ice
How he coast to line change always annoyed me. Glad to see I'm not the only one who realized that.
 

nhlfan9191

Registered User
Aug 4, 2010
19,981
18,162
I like Suzuki but he's always struck me as a Dylan Larkin type.. too clean, not gritty enough to make a difference. This is why Detroit is in quicksand.. the entire roster us made up of smallish, soft forwards.. this never works if the Cup is the true objective.. if we can bottom out this year, and pick up Hagens, id feel a gell of alot more secure with our top 6. As if now, we are a weak, soft team..
I would agree with this if I didn’t see him in that Stanley Cup run as a 21 year old. I think the losing is wearing on some of the guys. This is the fourth year the team has been in the basement of the league. Suzuki’s entering his prime. I’m sure the motivation right now is at an all time low.
 
  • Like
Reactions: junyab

junyab

Registered User
Jan 22, 2013
1,987
1,151
I like Suzuki but he's always struck me as a Dylan Larkin type.. too clean, not gritty enough to make a difference. This is why Detroit is in quicksand.. the entire roster us made up of smallish, soft forwards.. this never works if the Cup is the true objective.. if we can bottom out this year, and pick up Hagens, id feel a gell of alot more secure with our top 6. As if now, we are a weak, soft team..

I just can't understand this board sometimes - Larkin and Suzuki aren't making a difference out there? And it's Larkin's fault Detroit is where they are?!

:help:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Grate n Colorful Oz

domiwroze

Registered User
Nov 14, 2014
5,581
7,634
No it was not. Monty played well last season and I am sure they expected him to be a decent # 1. Still to be determined if he is.

I don't think they give 3 years and Reimer's type of contract to a expected #1 goalie.

This a stop gap contract until Fowler is ready to go 50-55games.
 

teamfirst

Registered User
Oct 28, 2016
3,787
2,490
MSL might not be the coach this team needs when it's ready to take the next step, but he's not going anywhere for now, he's growing as a coach much like the team is.

Why do we keep him then, do we think he is gona be some kind of genious coach that will change the way hockey is played for the century to come, why do the Habs has to grow a coach while developping young players.....are they no experience coach already grown avalaible.....jesus

Every young D we have as regress from their first day with us, at this rate they all gone have to relearn how to play defense when a new coach arrive

Matheson is going to get moved at some point in the next 15 months, patience.

Surely hope you're right, i'm not so sure, and they already missed a good opportunity to sell him high at the last TDL

Dvorak is going to move before this trade deadline, patience

Agree

Gallagher & Anderson, their contracts are too difficult to move and Hughes isn't taking a L just to move both players, especially not right now given they've been 2 of the more consistent players this season. if the team was actually good, then you might have a point that they "need to leave", but they're not good, so trading them at a cost to the Habs AND continuing to suck, doesn't fix anything but make you feel better that the team got rid of players you don't like.

True
 
  • Like
Reactions: 417

Miller Time

Registered User
Sep 16, 2004
24,191
17,040
You calling a fellow poster's post as "glaringly incoherent" never works to find decent conversation.

True. Also true that not all posts are meant to strike up a conversation.

Pointing out glaring incoherence in a post is meant to do just that, nothing more.

We all have our preferences- at this point none are wrong..

A preference is never "wrong", it's just a preference.

A baseless or incoherent argument, on the other hand, absolutely can be wrong.
 

417

When the going gets tough...
Feb 20, 2003
52,449
30,284
Ottawa
Why do we keep him then, do we think he is gona be some kind of genious coach that will change the way hockey is played for the century to come, why do the Habs has to grow a coach while developping young players.....are they no experience coach already grown avalaible.....jesus

Every young D we have as regress from their first day with us, at this rate they all gone have to relearn how to play defense when a new coach arrive
I don't know i'm just telling you that's the route they chose to go with, abandoning it now doesn't make much sense unless there's a surefire guy out there whose proven and you know will bring immediate results, on a roster not built for immediate success.
Surely hope you're right, i'm not so sure, and they already missed a good opportunity to sell him high at the last TDL
Dmen get traded at every deadline, i'm not sure why it would be any different now.

Matheson's popularity amongst Habs fans and his value around the league, couldn't be more diametrically opposed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: teamfirst

teamfirst

Registered User
Oct 28, 2016
3,787
2,490
I don't know i'm just telling you that's the route they chose to go with, abandoning it now doesn't make much sense unless there's a surefire guy out there whose proven and you know will bring immediate results, on a roster not built for immediate success.

Dmen get traded at every deadline, i'm not sure why it would be any different now.

Matheson's popularity amongst Habs fans and his value around the league, couldn't be more diametrically opposed.

To me it make sense to give our young guy's the best environment possible for them to developp properly and what i'm seeing since last season ain't it.

Again it as nothing to do with ''immediate results '' points wise but everything to do with developpment.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad