Acquiring those picks is the first step of the process undertaken when those picks become prospects/players. It's part of the same continuum that start with the strategic decision to change roster make-up.There is none, hence why I added Dach.
Heineman was acquired in the Toffoli deal, mentioned him also.
The Chiarot trade brought up a 1st round pick that brought in Alex Newhook (mentioned him also) and a 4th round pick (Cedric Guindon) who I also mentioned as one of the 30 players drafted by Hughes.
Nothing specious about it other than perhaps you misunderstanding of it.
Why would I do that when I clearly said it started with the Toffoli trade - which you disagreed withThat's normal...it can't be strictly defined. You're entitled to look at it your way, just as I am mine.
If you want to attribute Christian Dvorak to Kent Hughes rebuild plan, you're again entitled.
All good, this is a message board, the whole purpose to is have discussions, not necessarily agree with everything we all say.
Acquiring those picks is the first step of the process undertaken when those picks become prospects/players. It's part of the same continuum that start with the strategic decision to change roster make-up.
I'd love a board-wide consensus: Rebuild started with the hiring of Gorton and Hughes. Call it down the middle.... Jan 1st 2022
Yup. Preaching to the choir. Only one voice insists otherwise and I don’t think it should be allowed to distract an otherwise interesting discussion.Rebuild started at that moment because it was at that point they had a rebuild mandate and executed every move off of that vision.
Bergevin didn't rebuild when he drafted Kotkaniemi 3rd overall. That was a consequence of his shitty team building.
Coming out of a summer where they traded Kotkaniemi and a 2nd for Dvorak. Extended Armia. Signed Savard is not a rebuild summer.
No matter what you say , being a GM with the Rangers is easy mode .You mean like Rangers did with Gorton?
During his tenure as GM from July 1, 2015 – May of 2021 — Gorton signed Artemi Panarin, traded for Mika Zibanejad, Ryan Lindgren, Adam Fox and Jacob Trouba, and drafted Alexis Lafreniere, Filip Chytil, Brandon Schneider and Kaapo Kakko.
In before someone come here and dissect and disregard every move he made because muh New York
I would say he played a good part in building the Rangers of today. Only major pieces of the Rangers today that Gorton isn't responsible for is Trocheck, Kreider (Rangers since 09) and Shesterkin (picked just before he got there).
If HuGo can leaves us with the same assets that Gorton left the Rangers with, I will say we are in good hand and he will definitely have made a good job.
Yup. Preaching to the choir. Only one voice insists otherwise and I don’t think it should be allowed to distract an otherwise interesting discussion.
I like January 2022 because it is before the TDL and the draft. So far Hughes has helmed three trade deadlines and three off-seasons.
The rebuild is definitely not over but I don’t see any evidence they planned to tank this year. Do you think planned tanking is over?
Acquiring those picks is one part...they did that.Acquiring those picks is the first step of the process undertaken when those picks become prospects/players. It's part of the same continuum that start with the strategic decision to change roster make-up.
You'll never get a board-wide consensus because there are agendas.I'd love a board-wide consensus: Rebuild started with the hiring of Gorton and Hughes. Call it down the middle.... Jan 1st 2022
I didn't disagree with it because I CLEARLY added Emil Heineman as part of Hughes moves, the other part of that trade is the 2024 1st round pick which turned into Filip Mesar and the 2024 5th round pick which I believe turned into Tyler Thorpe.Why would I do that when I clearly said it started with the Toffoli trade - which you disagreed with
Why would you not put the ticker on a rebuild when a President/GM/coach are put in place? They had months to access and prepare for the 21/22 TDL where they would choose who to sell to tank while accumulating assets they wanted for the draft as well having months to prepare for the draft as well. Why would the rebuild start in the summer after they made moves to ensure a lottery pick. Doesn’t make any sense for people making that argument. The rebuild started when the team tanked and they cleaned house. And that happened at the end of 21, beginning of 22. The argument against that is stupid. HuGo and St. Louis were not hired in the off-season of 2022.I think I understand @417 point. He means the rebuild starts when there is actual building taking place (aka drafting Slaf).
Can't say I disagree. Just trying to make sense of it all.Why would you not put the ticker on a rebuild when a President/GM/coach are put in place? They had months to access and prepare for the 21/22 TDL where they would choose to sell to tank while accumulating assets for the draft as well having months to prepare for the draft as well. Why would the rebuild start in the summer after they made moves to ensure a lottery pick. Doesn’t make any sense for people making that argument. The rebuild started when the team ranked and the former regime was fired.
Cmon bruv - this is how it startedI didn't disagree with it because I CLEARLY added Emil Heineman as part of Hughes moves, the other part of that trade is the 2024 1st round pick which turned into Filip Mesar and the 2024 5th round pick which I believe turned into Tyler Thorpe.
Once again, i'll repeat, most of what Hughes has done as part of his rebuild...isn't on the Montreal Canadiens 2024-25 roster yet.
So it's hard to for me, if i'm being objective, to rate his job of rebuilding...we've yet to see the fruits of that labour.
The rebuild officially started the moment we traded Toffoli away - that was the first domino and led to a busy trade deadline where we dumped Lehkonen, Chiarot, and Kulak.
No it didn't...at least not IMO.
Before you rebuild anything, it implies something already existed that you have to tear down.
That was the tear down (which frankly, continues to this day and this trade deadline when he gets rid of Armia, Dvorak and perhaps Savard).
Their rebuild started that summer when they drafted Slafkovsky.
Dumping is not rebuilding since you're stripping away. You rebuild by adding, not stripping.
Bruv lol I've made subsequent posts after that to show that the return from the Toffoli trade is JUST starting to be applied to the current NHL roster.Cmon bruv - this is how it started
This the kid everyone was raving about how his development was going amazing cause they cooked him in the AHL?
Generational talent to the AHL
I didn't disagree with it because I CLEARLY added Emil Heineman as part of Hughes moves, the other part of that trade is the 2024 1st round pick which turned into Filip Mesar and the 2024 5th round pick which I believe turned into Tyler Thorpe.
And you took over for McCagg as the appeal to authority homer who thinks he's smarter than everyone else
Do you see a disconnect between HUGO and MSL ?Drafted Slafkovsky due to the size and skill package.
Draft Owen Beck who is a pest and plays a physical and agitation game.
Signed Luke Tuch when they could have let him go to UFA.
Signed Struble when they could have let him go to UFA.
Wanted to keep Anderson as part of the team due to his blend of size and toughness.
Drafted Jared Davidson, a rugged forward who sticks up for his teammates and is no stranger to dropping the gloves.
Drafted Florian Xhekaj, a fighter like his brother.
Drafted Owen Protz, one of the most physical and violent players in the draft and a willing fighter.
Drafted Tyler Thorpe a 6'5 physical forward.
Drafted Ben Merrill a 6'4 defensive forward with some bite.
Kotkaniemi Sergachev Caufield is three top 14 picks in the five seasons before Hughes was hired.
I got it wrong (thought Sergy was 2017 and Caufield 14th OA, but you were cunning in your delinations!) but I don't think you even need to argue that the rebuild started with HuGo's hiring -- that much is plainly obvious. It shouldn't even be up for debate.
A more interesting debate is if Caufield, Suzuki, and Guhle (+) counts as a good, normal, or bad initial position of a rebuild's asset bank.
Dumping is not rebuilding since you're stripping away. You rebuild by adding, not stripping.