THIS... is probably the consensus with which we should work going forward. I wouldn't call it infancy, maybe toddlerhood, but it's been c. 3 years (3 TDLs, 3 drafts, and 3 off-seasons) and the roster had a lot of gaps and the hockey ops office had to be rebuilt from the ground up.
It still does have gaps, hence why I don't really consider it as 3 TDLs, 3 drafts and 3 offseasons.
Both TDLs have been focused on trimming, rather than adding (which is how you build UP), they did nothing this offseason except add an opportunity cost player (Laien) who hasn't even played yet.
The 3 drafts have yet to yield much because it's too early.
But again, I don't think it's important to get bogged down in what word we use to define where they're at, the most important factor is it's still
VERY early.
Now how about this:
It's 100% fair to believe the 'rebuild' should go on for longer but at some point you cannot hold both of the following positions without at criticising the execution of at least one:
1) the Dach and Newhook buys were worthwhile efforts
2) the rebuild was always going to take 5 or more years
I think our cupboard would've looked much better if we retained the 13OA 2022, 31OA 2023, and 37OA 2023. Dach might've been a worthwhile one-off strike at gold but Newhook makes the pattern look like they were trying for speed up the rebuild.
The cupboard might look better, but barely anyone from those drafts has played any NHL games, so we'd be at this exact same spot.
13OA from 2022 draft (Frank Nazar): 3 NHL games played
31 OA from 2023 draft (Mikhail Guylayev): 0 NHL games played
37 OA from 2023 draft (Ethan Gauthier: 0 NHL games played
This of course, assumes we would have picked the players who were eventually picked there.
But point being our cupboard looking "better" does not necessarily mean that the rebuild would be in a better state.
I totally get where you're going with this though.