The US has a big population base including plenty of kids who play soccer. Compared to some of the kids who play lacrosse or track and field or whatever sports only exist professionally in Europe our soccer kids shoukd have a decent path to success. It’s been years and years and the US is minimally better. I guess the governing body just hasn’t made an effort.
It's my understand that the training, coaching, and facilities hold back the US as well.
But let's be honest, if a kid has a shot at d1 soccer vs football or basketball there simply is no choice.
I'm pretty sure USA soccer has tried, and you see the investments all over the place. It's just that 95+% of people able to compete at a high level of sport here won't choose it. And you often times know who those kids are by middle school, high school the latest.
And even if you're the best we've produced this decade, Pulicic was still coming off the bench half of the time for Chelsea this season.
The infrastructure simply isn't there. It could be eventually, as in a looooong way down the road. But the shiny new MLS stadiums aren't going to do it. You'd need elementary and middle schools in key areas to go all in.
Minnesota doesn't just produce the most hockey players because it's cold. Half the country is cold. It's because it's their culture.
How you form hotbeds of soccer like that I'm not entirely sure. I'd say Texas or Florida would be good candidates due to their large Hispanic populations, but football and Jesus are neck and neck in popularity in those places. Maybe SoCal? But they've been trying that for decades and when Mexico rolls into town it's practically a home game for them. NYC is trying but the suburbs don't seem to be buying in as much and we don't produce many athletes outside of a few guys in the NBA anyway. Then there's the space issue here. Good luck finding a regulation field.
In otherwards I don't have an answer on how to grow the talent level here and am not sure there is one, much to the chagrin of a few of my buddies.