gach
Registered User
- Aug 2, 2018
- 532
- 354
They might be really bad but wait until they play yhe Flames and then we'll see who is really bad
He and Will Smith will make one of the best one-two center punches in many years. Both are absolute studs.Celebrini will look great in teal.
It's why I didn't understand Grier not wanting to retain any salary on Karlsson.
I understand that he achieved his goal but why not retain the max and stock up on as many draft picks/prospects/players as possible?
Because it isn’t a video game?It's why I didn't understand Grier not wanting to retain any salary on Karlsson.
I understand that he achieved his goal but why not retain the max and stock up on as many draft picks/prospects/players as possible?
Hey thanks for weighing in with a stupid answer after people actually replied in earnest.Because it isn’t a video game?
Do you not know there was “some retention” on this deal? From the very beginning of the EK65 trade rumors (2/23) there was mention of a maximum of 18% retention (actual was ~13%).Hey thanks for weighing in with a stupid answer after people actually replied in earnest.
I know it's not a videogame. And I figured it was the owner keeping the wallet closed on this one. I doesn't change that with some retention they might've sweetened the return from one of their biggest assets and jumpstarted a rebuild.
Yzerman bought out Abdelkader so was paying him to not play for the rebuilding Wings and retained on Vrana. Things happen.
Trade Hertl, Couture and Vlasic. You're not going to build around these guys for the future.
See, was that so hard? lolDo you not know there was “some retention” on this deal? From the very beginning of the EK65 trade rumors (2/23) there was mention of a maximum of 18% retention (actual was ~13%).
Retaining the max (~$23M) would have represented ~1/2 of Abdelkader and Vrana’s combined career earnings. You can’t understand why an owner wouldn’t whip open up their check book to pay a player that much not to play for the team?
There was also almost no competition due to league-wide cap constraints for teams that would benefit from adding Karlsson, so it was a “take what you can get” scenario.
Bettman wanted a 32 team league so... here you go
There will be 1 to 2 teams every year that are this bad moving forward
I figured Vlasic retired by now. How in the hell is he still in the NHL? Good lordie
Nah, that roster is trash. There's nothing there.David Quinn is a real problem...
He is probably the worst coach in NHL history at developing talent.
Nobody progressed from his first year to his second year under his tutelage.
Mike Grier probably hired him... because he wants to get low picks for the foreseeable future. But he is a cancer around young NHL talent. This isn't college hockey. He is out of his depth.
People are going to say... "Look at the roster... what do you expect?".... Lame excuse.... These are still NHLers... The NHL is a game of parity... People can't and don't play for him.
Keep Eklund, Bordeleau & Will Smith as far away form Quinn as possible.
Ir wasn't Griers call on retention. That's on ownershipIt's why I didn't understand Grier not wanting to retain any salary on Karlsson.
I understand that he achieved his goal but why not retain the max and stock up on as many draft picks/prospects/players as possible?
Picture the Chicago Blackhawks only minus Bedard.
That’s the Sharks.
Are they going to trade poor Hertl? He deserves a team somewhere.
When he's ready to go. He probably wanted to stick around for family stability. At least for a time. I think the team would prefer him being dealt after the Burns retention ends.Are they going to trade poor Hertl? He deserves a team somewhere.