Trade Hertl, Couture and Vlasic. You're not going to build around these guys for the future.
It was the length of the retention that was the issue. He didn't want to have ~6M in cap space being tied up to a former player up to 4 years down the road when he needs to be flexible in case something happens and the Sharks become good before then.
Anything can happen in Hockey and in Sports in general in a short amount of time. Both the Rangers and Diamondbacks combined for 210 losses 2 seasons ago, look where they are now.
I wonder what packages and players were really available to them as they unloaded whatever they could, they seem to be trying to find gems among marginal NHL talent v. trading for true futures. Like trading Lorentz and a 5th for Duclair, why? Why are you not doing a full rebuild?
Tbf the only other trade like that that leaps out is Leonard and a 3rd for Luke Kunin. Still they have a long road ahead of them for sure.
Yes but those are both examples of MLB. I'm assuming you're a fan of the team so are more familiar of the circumstances than I am, but do you really think the Sharks will be so good in 4 years that $6 million in cap space will matter? Especially with the cap going up?
I can understand an owner not wanting to shell out money for a guy to play somewhere else but it's the cost of doing business if you want to acquire more assets in return.
The Canadiens are doing similar stuff too, mixed results so far I'd say. Maybe they don't have the ownership support to go full Arizona/Chicago.I think the idea was to get a better-than-5th rounder back for Duclair at the deadline. Lorentz is a fringe player with no value.
Kunin for Leonard was a terrible trade though.
He'll be wearing a Hawks jersey come JuneFormer Junior Sharks player with ties to the Bay Area. It's almost a perfect match.
Hertl doesn't have much value due to his contract - same with Couture.Trade Hertl, Couture and Vlasic. You're not going to build around these guys for the future.
Yea this team has no puck movers on the back end. Basically the only breakout option is chuck it off the boards and hope for the best. Ty Emberson, picked up off waivers, is arguably our best all-around defenseman right now.Ya, it's the coaches fault lol
I saw Vlasic on the f***ing powerplay this weekend.
wtf is this
View attachment 760279
They're on pace for 10 points on the season...
...if you round up.
Hahaha no it isn’t. This is EXACTLY what we wanted. It’s baffling to me that people can be fans of the NHL and not realize the sharks are rebuilding and are intentionally tanking.This is just karma for sharks fans laughing at the ducks the last couple seasons.
Barring some lottery luck, I can see them being in the same situation the Wings were in circa 2017.I mean, they don't have any good players. They don't seem very well coached. They also don't really seem to give much of a crap. So i'm not sure this should be surprising.
In the long haul, they'll win some games eventually and cobble together a handful of points. Even a terrible team in today's parity league can win when circumstances and bounces go just right every now and then. The schedule is long and other teams will have plenty of games where they look past the Sharks and mail in a terrible effort of their own.
But they're clearly in a full on tank mode. The bigger question is...how many years will it take for them to wash away and shake off that awful stench of tanking? 5? 10? Somewhere in between? Longer even?
We have a few good prospects outside of Smith…Barring some lottery luck, I can see them being in the same situation the Wings were in circa 2017.
Aging top players with poor contracts, no real good prospects (outside of Smith, who hopefully for them isn’t their Zadina) and mediocre prospect depth.
If they don’t win some lotteries you’re looking at close to a decade IMO
I’m not familiar with this term OP. Did you mean ‘horribad’?Yeah, nobody expected the Sharks to contend any time soon, but holy hannah they are awful so far. Like, horror-bad awful.
After nine games, they have 1 shoot-out loss to show for the season.
They have 9 goals, total, in nine games. (Alex Debrincat, by himself, has matched their entire team's goal production.) They've allowed 26 goals against, putting them almost at -3 per game (or -240 for a full season).
Amazingly, their goaltending -- by save percentage, anyway -- has been fine. Their PK is about League-average so far, and their PP isn't the worst in the League (they dishonor goes to St. Louis's staggering 4.8% on the season), so their inept results are mainly down to 5-on-5 utter futility. They have scored six even strength goals all season.
How bad is it going to get? Will it get worse? Or, is this start just a mirage and they're actually not too bad?
I wouldn’t really consider any of them top prospects like himWe have a few good prospects outside of Smith…
I'd much rather the Sharks be like this than a middle-of-the-pack team with no cap space or prospects like they were before Grier took over. Atleast he's committed to the future.
Calgary's time to shineJust wait until bubble teams continuously jump ahead of you in the draft, that’s the worst part