until he gets hurt againInjury put Bedard's Calder win in jeopardy but he got back in time. He's easily the favorite again.
Bedard is back points in 3 straight games and pretty soon someone can post the "who will be second for the Calder this year" thread.No problem Bedard just scored again, and this one will count.
Edit: and he picks up another point. 3 point night so far.
Please tell me the lottery numbers, oh great prophet.until he gets hurt again
I'm taking the over.39 points in 42 games for Bedard now. Really hoping he finishes the season above a ppg but we'll have to see how things go
Futile. We’ve been told it doesn’t matter for this trophy.I need more paragraphs about his defensive play
Good I’m glad we’re all on the same page now.Futile. We’ve been told it doesn’t matter for this trophy.
I need more paragraphs about his defensive play
He's gotten a point in 6 of their last 7 goals over the 3 games.Another assist for Bedard
Bedard is our entire offense at this point
I think some folks read more into his missives than was there. He was suggesting Bedard is not a great defensive player yet. At 18 on a bad team at his size and with his skill set is that so controversial? He acknowledged Bedard's great talent and did not suggest Bedard is some sort of finished product. A number of Faber supporters said similar things at one time or another. It's hard to see Faber beating out Bedard for the Calder but to suggest Faber's game is more mature does not sound so outlandish.@WhiskeyYerTheDevils ’s Bedard alarm must have broken.
It's not what he said, it's how often he said it. Literally go into any Bedard thread on this board and you will see him saying the same thing over and over. Its bordering on an obsession. The fact that he is not even a Minnesota fan, at least as it relates to this thread, makes it even more comical.I think some folks read more into his missives than was there. He was suggesting Bedard is not a great defensive player yet. At 18 on a bad team at his size and with his skill set is that so controversial? He acknowledged Bedard's great talent and did not suggest Bedard is some sort of finished product. A number of Faber supporters said similar things at one time or another. It's hard to see Faber beating out Bedard for the Calder but to suggest Faber's game is more mature does not sound so outlandish.
We all have our biases. Go into any thread about seafood and I'll be pounding the table that scallops while being underrated are difficult to prepare at home.It's not what he said, it's how often he said it. Literally go into any Bedard thread on this board and you will see him saying the same thing over and over. Its bordering on an obsession. The fact that he is not even a Minnesota fan, at least as it relates to this thread, makes it even more comical.
Ofcourse Faber's game is more mature - he's 3 years older.I think some folks read more into his missives than was there. He was suggesting Bedard is not a great defensive player yet. At 18 on a bad team at his size and with his skill set is that so controversial? He acknowledged Bedard's great talent and did not suggest Bedard is some sort of finished product. A number of Faber supporters said similar things at one time or another. It's hard to see Faber beating out Bedard for the Calder but to suggest Faber's game is more mature does not sound so outlandish.