I was about to make the comment “watch Blackhawks fans call this guy smart like he hasn’t been trolling wild fans for over a decade.” A blackhawks poster beat me to the punch. PredictableFrom a notorious Wild hater.
I was about to make the comment “watch Blackhawks fans call this guy smart like he hasn’t been trolling wild fans for over a decade.” A blackhawks poster beat me to the punch. PredictableFrom a notorious Wild hater.
Somebody from the Ducks/Coyotes fanbase should pop in and talk about Mintyukov/Cooley. I would love to hear how they are doing. Everybody gets Bedard rammed down their throat. It would be nice to hear about the other rookies.This is a really good rookie year imo, in particular lots of impressive Dmen; Faber, Hughes, Mintyukov. And some great forwards too, Carlsson / Cooley have been great.
All that said Bedard is running away with it, and not just cause of the hype he's actually exceeded expectations imo.
Carlsson, too. He's the one that really interests me.Somebody from the Ducks/Coyotes fanbase should pop in and talk about Mintyukov/Cooley. I would love to hear how they are doing. Everybody gets Bedard rammed down their throat. It would be nice to hear about the other rookies.
Me too. Unfortunately, it looks like he’s going to be out for at least a month.Carlsson, too. He's the one that really interests me.
Oddly enough, I don't really disagree with much in here, except that I think Rossi has been better than you're saying. Besides the points, a high majority of which are even strength and only 7 of 22 involving Kaprizov or Boldy, he does a lot of really good things every night which might not always "get his name called" but are reflective of his being a really good player.Is Faber really tilting the ice? Is he really instrumental in why they are hot? Those statements deserve a closer look.
1) Statistically Faber is not what he is being hyped as except for one number. Possession-wise he is average. His PK goals against is average. His PP goals for is below average. His 5 on 5 offense is below average. Jake Middleton is a close comparison in most of his stats, and nobody will claim he is in the same ballpark. The one stat that sticks out for Faber is 5 on 5 goals against. It's incredibly low, and it is the stat that ultimately counts on the defensive end. But it's clearly an outlier. Is it an accurate reflection of his play? Or is it simply an outlier that will regress over time as his luck changes? I'd say when you sum up the stats that lead to goals for and against, it says wait and see over a larger sample size before you crown him. The ingredients don't point to the cake.
2) This answer is much easier to answer. The Wild are playing much better because they are an emotionally immature team, got a coach fired, and now again play with that playoff-like intensity they are known for. Did Faber all of a sudden turn on god-mode 13 games ago and drive his team to wins? No. The entire team turned on their controllers. Faber was already getting hyped when they were playing like garbage and couldn't keep the puck out of their net. So what is it? Is he really this driving force that is being claimed? Or is he just another good player on a decent team? The evidence so far points far more to the latter than the former.
I disagree. I think besides Bedard this is another weak class. For example, the 2nd player in points (Rossi) plays with good linemates and yet you just don't hear his name called often. For as high a scoring this league is right now, there's only three guys not named Bedard that have played most of the season and are on a pace for over 50 points over an 82 game season. This is nothing like the mid-teens or earlier.
It's kind of hard to compare a forward to a defenseman. It's like saying a cornerback vs a running back going for rookie of the year and measuring based off of touchdowns.
Maybe they should split the Calder into defensive and offensive units?
Sounds good. LolThe Kyle Calder Offensive Rookie of the year trophy and the Frank Calder Defensive rookie of the year trophy?
I can do that. The Ducks have three compelling rookies this year: Pavel Mintyukov, D; Leo Carlsson, F; Lukas Dostal, G.Somebody from the Ducks/Coyotes fanbase should pop in and talk about Mintyukov/Cooley. I would love to hear how they are doing. Everybody gets Bedard rammed down their throat. It would be nice to hear about the other rookies.
Minty has been great. Hes not running the PP now with Drysdale back but his pairing has been solid defensively and he sill manages to get on the score sheet time to time.Somebody from the Ducks/Coyotes fanbase should pop in and talk about Mintyukov/Cooley. I would love to hear how they are doing. Everybody gets Bedard rammed down their throat. It would be nice to hear about the other rookies.
Bedard sucks defensively, get over it.Just can’t have nice conversations here.
Cooley had some great offence at the start of the year but according to Bill Armstrong they are trying to get him focusing on the Defensive side of the game.. they want him to be a 200 ft player. Which is all good , but I think that will come , you don’t want to stifle him
that said he is on the PP unit 2
I kinda of like what the NFL does.I wouldn't make new trophy, but I would like a honorable mentions under Calder. Smth like this:
- Best rookie forward
- Best rookie defensemen
- Best rookie goalie
That way player like Luke Hughes would have in his resume "NHL best rookie defensemen in 23-24 season"
There is an All-Rookie TeamI wouldn't make new trophy, but I would like a honorable mentions under Calder. Smth like this:
- Best rookie forward
- Best rookie defensemen
- Best rookie goalie
That way player like Luke Hughes would have in his resume "NHL best rookie defensemen in 23-24 season"
Will/will not and should/should not are pretty different.
If you guys were offered Bedard for Faber you'd all take that 1000 times out of 1000.