Paper
Registered User
- Nov 4, 2009
- 4,669
- 2,283
Playing well into their late 30's is a lot different then having 5 more years of dominant play from Getzlaf and Perry. Everyone is probably expecting Getzlaf and Perry to be solid players in their mid 30's. Expecting them to be dominant at that time though is a lot different. Iginla was dominant as a 31 year old, not as a 35 year old. The Sedins were dominant as 31 year olds, not as 35 year olds. Both Calgary and Vancouver took downward spirals as their dominant star players began to fade. Even the unusual case of Jagr, who was dominant as 33 year old, slowed down considerably by 35 before he left the NHL.I look at Thornton, Iginla, Sedins, Jagr who all have played well into thir late 30's. If healthy, there is no reason Getzlaf, Perry and Kesler wouldn't still be pretty damn good for 4-5 years. Actually, save for big injuries that derailed a player's career, who are the last ''elite'' players who randomly started to decline around 34 or 35 years of age? Even a guy like Zetterberg is 36 now and is just starting to decline, and injuries have played a part.