Speculation: The Quest to sign Lindholm: Part II

Status
Not open for further replies.

liquiduck

Registered User
Jul 23, 2015
2,128
0
Lindholm is going to get less then 7M this year. Also that contract was signed back in 11-12, the cap has sense gone up. The contract you're talking about is a lot more then the "low ball",his words, offer Lindholm received. The difference is the player knew he was asking for a lot, where Lindholm isn't asking much different from any of his comparables.

Edit: I would also like to add that the Kings management planned ahead and left the space open to sign their #1D.

Doughty is also a significantly better player. Of course he got more money. Lindholm was asking for more than 7 mil a year AAV to start. 6 would have been the very upper limit i would have gone before some of his peers like Risto and Jones signed new deals. Now I wouldn't go higher than 5.5/5.6 mil. If Lindholm wants to call that a cheap deal than whatever. hes the one losing money by refusing to sign. He still has no leverage. Maybe at some point he'l realize that, just like his peers.
 

aj8000

Registered User
Jun 5, 2010
1,256
35
They had other players to re-sign. Also, a few past mistakes compounded the issue( Stoner/ Bieksa). Whatever, mistakes happen.

I'm not sure why people expected Anaheim to put their entire roster on hold though while waiting for Lindholm. Rakell and Vatanen needed new deals, we needed another competent goalie, and another center to replace Thompson. It is what it is. If anaheim didn't think they could get him signed, then i'm sure Lindholm would be wearing a different uniform right now. Maybe they do eventually move him. Fowler is playing awfully well right now.

They should have saved the space pure and simple. If that means bringing players from the A to fill spots a low cost that is what you do in the cap world.

Interesting, I think some duck fans disagree with you with that; however, if Fowler is playing like crap, then he maybe hard to trade
 

Trolfoli

Registered User
May 30, 2013
4,640
0
Doughty is also a significantly better player. Of course he got more money. Lindholm was asking for more than 7 mil a year AAV to start. 6 would have been the very upper limit i would have gone before some of his peers like Risto and Jones signed new deals. Now I wouldn't go higher than 5.5/5.6 mil. If Lindholm wants to call that a cheap deal than whatever. hes the one losing money by refusing to sign. He still has no leverage. Maybe at some point he'l realize that, just like his peers.

The Ducks record argues otherwise. Oilers and Van are off to hot starts. Van's playing a Kings team with Budaj in net tonight. How big of a hole do the Ducks want to start the season in?
 

CaptainChef

Registered User
Jan 5, 2014
7,868
815
Bedroom Jetsville
I just dont get how they could end up like this. You dont resign Bieksa,Vatanen and Rakell before Lindholm. You dont trade for a backup Who is average at best Who carries a 4+mill cap hit. Who is doing the math? Use Tokarski or something as the backup and pay Lindholm. Trading for Bernier was as dumb as it gets in the position they Are in. Bad contracts happens,specially for ufa's but not when you know that Bieksa isnt very good and they have tons of d-prospects. Same with Bernier, why trade for a backup with that high of a cap hit? Its just horrible work by the GM, shouldnt be possible to make thoose decisions....

I just didn't realize that Muray made so many of those stupid deals just recently. That and giving Kesler way too much. And hiring Carlyle as a coach (again). Definite candidate for the unemployment role with or without Lindholm getting signed.
 

Trolfoli

Registered User
May 30, 2013
4,640
0
They should have saved the space pure and simple. If that means bringing players from the A to fill spots a low cost that is what you do in the cap world.

Interesting, I think some duck fans disagree with you with that; however, if Fowler is playing like crap, then he maybe hard to trade

The issue is going to be finding a team that can take on all $4M cap hit at this time without sending cap back. Eating $4M cuts the market for Fowler drastically and you probably aren't going to get the return you want since teams know the Ducks are being forced to trade him.

The easy fix (edit: for the Ducks GM) for this problem is trading Lindholm.
 

liquiduck

Registered User
Jul 23, 2015
2,128
0
Do not believe everything you read especially on the internet, what else are they going to say? No comment? Are they going to tell the reporter the real reason if there is one? Why is the number they are so call apart by jumping around like a pinball?

I'm sure anahiem isn't telling reporters anyting. They're as tight lipped as it gets. People like McKenzie speculate based on the informatrion they get from whatever sources they have. I doubt that info is coming from the Ducsk front office.

The only thing we've heard out of BM is that he'll deal with the cap when a deal is reached. What do you think the alternative is? The two sides have agreed on a contract , the two sides just won't sign it because they refuse to use LTIR?
 

Trolfoli

Registered User
May 30, 2013
4,640
0
I just didn't realize that Muray made so many of those stupid deals just recently. That and giving Kesler way too much. And hiring Carlyle as a coach (again). Definite candidate for the unemployment role with or without Lindholm getting signed.

Lindholm just watched the money for his contract go out the door this Summer.
 

liquiduck

Registered User
Jul 23, 2015
2,128
0
The Ducks record argues otherwise. Oilers and Van are off to hot starts. Van's playing a Kings team with Budaj in net tonight. How big of a hole do the Ducks want to start the season in?

Anaheim got off to one of the worst starts in their history last year and still won the division. You think one road trip puts any pressure on BM?

If it's one thing Anaheim has proven is that they can climb out of a huge early hole. It's not even November yet :laugh:
 

Sojourn

Registered User
Nov 1, 2006
50,523
9,377
They should have saved the space pure and simple. If that means bringing players from the A to fill spots a low cost that is what you do in the cap world.

Interesting, I think some duck fans disagree with you with that; however, if Fowler is playing like crap, then he maybe hard to trade

You think some Anaheim fans disagree that Fowler is playing well?
 

liquiduck

Registered User
Jul 23, 2015
2,128
0
They should have saved the space pure and simple. If that means bringing players from the A to fill spots a low cost that is what you do in the cap world.

Interesting, I think some duck fans disagree with you with that; however, if Fowler is playing like crap, then he maybe hard to trade

Fowler is playing great hockey right now. Their best player so far in this short season.

Saying that they should have just saved the space is just ignorance. Teams can't wait around all year for players to sign a deals.
 

aj8000

Registered User
Jun 5, 2010
1,256
35
I'm sure anahiem isn't telling reporters anyting. They're as tight lipped as it gets. People like McKenzie speculate based on the informatrion they get from whatever sources they have. I doubt that info is coming from the Ducsk front office.

The only thing we've heard out of BM is that he'll deal with the cap when a deal is reached. What do you think the alternative is? The two sides have agreed on a contract , the two sides just won't sign it because they refuse to use LTIR?

Maybe they are starting to deal with it since they gained 200,000 in cap with the players switch with the A. There are many reasons a deal has not been signed, the most likely is the cap situation and/or the fabled internal cap the Ducks have. Either way, Ducks management screwed up big time. The problem is they cannot deal with it when the contract is signed now that the season has started, I believe they need the cap space first then signed. I guess they could have an agreement in principal then clear the cap space for him.

I think real reason is that there are no teams willing to take on the cap hit the ducks need to dump because of their own internal budgets and/or risk of putting themselves in the same position the ducks are next season.
 

Freudian

Clearly deranged
Jul 3, 2003
50,550
17,607
Bob Murray should be fined by NHL for not allowing one of the better D-men in the league to play as a result of his extremely poor planning

It's not against the CBA to be bad at your job. I think a lot of GMs, coaches and players are grateful for that.
 

liquiduck

Registered User
Jul 23, 2015
2,128
0
Maybe they are starting to deal with it since they gained 200,000 in cap with the players switch with the A. There are many reasons a deal has not been signed, the most likely is the cap situation and/or the fabled internal cap the Ducks have. Either way, Ducks management screwed up big time. The problem is they cannot deal with it when the contract is signed now that the season has started, I believe they need the cap space first then signed. I guess they could have an agreement in principal then clear the cap space for him.

I think real reason is that there are no teams willing to take on the cap hit the ducks need to dump because of their own internal budgets and/or risk of putting themselves in the same position the ducks are next season.

It's a possbility I guess. Just like it's also a possibility that they are just waiting for a deal to be made before putting Thompson and Depsres on LTIR. I guess we'll have to wait and see.
 

Trolfoli

Registered User
May 30, 2013
4,640
0
Anaheim got off to one of the worst starts in their history last year and still won the division. You think one road trip puts any pressure on BM?

If it's one thing Anaheim has proven is that they can climb out of a huge early hole. It's not even November yet :laugh:

The division has changed hasn't it. You'll also be playing without one of Fowler/Lindholm this year.
 

liquiduck

Registered User
Jul 23, 2015
2,128
0
The division has changed hasn't it. You'll also be playing without one of Fowler/Lindholm this year.

We'll see about that.

If that was the case Anaheim isn't going anywhere anyway so it doesn't really matter what kind of start we get off to. Either way the pressure argument doesn't fly.
 

Sojourn

Registered User
Nov 1, 2006
50,523
9,377
The division has changed hasn't it. You'll also be playing without one of Fowler/Lindholm this year.

Unless you're Murray, you can't make that claim without being full of crap. Nothing personal, but you're trying to make an absolute statement without having the absolute proof to back up your statement.
 

Trolfoli

Registered User
May 30, 2013
4,640
0
We'll see about that.

If that was the case Anaheim isn't going anywhere anyway so it doesn't really matter what kind of start we get off to. Either way the pressure argument doesn't fly.

So where is the cap coming from to sign both Fowler AND Lindholm?
 

Sojourn

Registered User
Nov 1, 2006
50,523
9,377
So where is the cap coming from to sign both Fowler AND Lindholm?

Fowler doesn't need to be signed this year, so I'm not sure what your point is. Fowler is signed, and he's signed to a very team friendly $4m.
 

aj8000

Registered User
Jun 5, 2010
1,256
35
Fowler is playing great hockey right now. Their best player so far in this short season.

Saying that they should have just saved the space is just ignorance. Teams can't wait around all year for players to sign a deals.
Yes they can if they are as good as Ducks fans say lindholm is
 

aj8000

Registered User
Jun 5, 2010
1,256
35
And your take from that is that Fowler isn't playing well? I'm not sure I follow your line of reasoning here.

I read the initial quote wrong, I thought they said he was playing bad and I was responding that he was playing well.

awfully well

was interpreted by my brain as just "awful" English is hard sometimes
 

Trolfoli

Registered User
May 30, 2013
4,640
0
Unless you're Murray, you can't make that claim without being full of crap. Nothing personal, but you're trying to make an absolute statement without having the absolute proof to back up your statement.

What are the other options?
1)Pay to move Bieksa/Stoner: looks bad for a GM that just brought in overpriced contracts.
2)LTIR: If everyone gets healthy at the same time they're worse off then they are now.
3)Trade Vat, not any different then losing 1 of Fowler/Lindholm

So how full of crap am I? Did I miss anything?
 

Trolfoli

Registered User
May 30, 2013
4,640
0
Fowler doesn't need to be signed this year, so I'm not sure what your point is. Fowler is signed, and he's signed to a very team friendly $4m.

Ducks have about 300K space right now.
https://www.capfriendly.com/teams/ducks

They need 5-6M to sign Lindholm. They have to cut that money out of the roster somewhere.

Edit: The Ducks don't have the roster space to get both Fowler and Lindholm on the team right now and I'm not seeing how they come up with it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Ad

Ad