xlm34
Registered User
- Dec 1, 2008
- 3,288
- 3,364
My economist brain is also saying that Addison got...overpaid? Obviously there isn't yet a full read on value in this sport with the NIL yet, but you are just getting a WR for one year. Crucially, does he put you over the top? What is the value of USC making the playoff? Winning the champ? And how much realistically does a single WR increase those odds? Best in mind that the playing field of college sports is already unfair to begin with. USC will have better talent than most teams they are playing against regardless.
I could see this for a QB (e.g., the newest Manning) or for like Zion Williamson at Duke because in basketball who your best player is is paramount. But for a WR, 1 year, $3M? Cui Bono?
On tampering, the NCAA may want to ensure there aren't gambling links. Say a bunch of people place huge bets on USC winning the Chip, then this happens? Or say you had a prop bet that a USC WR would win the Belitnikoff, then you paid for Addison. It's weird man
Rumor is their QB has an NIL deal worth 2.5 million. So Addison is overpaid if you just base it off of that. And from what I’ve read, they aren’t really lacking talent at the receiver position so Addison doesn’t really turn a weakness into a strength.
Obviously having Addison is better than not having Addison, but it seems like they’re just doing this because they can do it. It’s crazy.