nah they wouldnt lose that much miney with guarenteed contracts. They just wouldnt be able to easily replace guys that suck all of a sudden, like they do now.
its a lot more complicated that NFL has x dollars in the bank, they can hold longer. They also have a lot more to lose and more obligations to fulfill contracts with sponsors, TV networks etc.
There is Zero percent chance a lockout/strike would last more than a season. And even that is the nuclear option.
These teams are generally spending their cap money. They are just deferring money from one set of players to other when a guy gets released.
Nah, you are wrong, sorry. You don’t understand the scope of things when you make these types of comments.
If the players somehow miraculously got all 1700 players to stand their ground on guaranteed contracts and risk their long term security, there would be a lockout like this league has never seen.
The owners would take a temporary public relations hit and lockout for a couple seasons to ensure they don’t make concessions that would have long term effects for their league.
Guaranteed contracts are non-negotiable with the owners. That means they will never budge on the issue and the players can’t do jack shit about it.
The fans would be back, sponsors would be back, but they know when they make concessions like guaranteed contacts, it will cost them billons of dollars over the long term.
It’s a concession they could then never take back.
Just like when the owners said the 17 game schedule is non-negotiable, that’s it. Game over and the players can’t do a thing about it.
They know it. So do the owners.