pistolpete11
Registered User
- Apr 27, 2013
- 11,906
- 10,864
I don't understand the strong negative reaction to Smith
As an OC, his team finished 10th and 4th in points. Because he handed the ball off to Henry? OK, but why wouldn't you when Henry is your best player? And those 2 years were Henry's career highs in yards, TD's, and Y/A. They were also by far Tannenhill's best years, to the point you might even call them outliers. Given the roster makeup (particularly the QB's) and the head coach, a run heavy, play-action type of offense that has the potential to still put up a lot of points makes a lot sense actually.
I'd prefer someone from the Shanahan tree, especially looking towards the future if/when they decide that Pickett ain't it, but I think they could do a lot worse than Smith.
As an OC, his team finished 10th and 4th in points. Because he handed the ball off to Henry? OK, but why wouldn't you when Henry is your best player? And those 2 years were Henry's career highs in yards, TD's, and Y/A. They were also by far Tannenhill's best years, to the point you might even call them outliers. Given the roster makeup (particularly the QB's) and the head coach, a run heavy, play-action type of offense that has the potential to still put up a lot of points makes a lot sense actually.
I'd prefer someone from the Shanahan tree, especially looking towards the future if/when they decide that Pickett ain't it, but I think they could do a lot worse than Smith.