Honestly me too. Although I hope they go big name hunting and I'd even take an older player with a good bat even if it comes with some risk i.e Yelich, Arenado, Goldschmidt etc. Even Trout or Soto but those are probably pipe dreams at best. Hernandez and Gurriel are some of the lower profiles I'd be interested in that we could actually land and probably more "realistic".The more I think about, the more I think I will be onboard with signing Gurriel Jr. and Teo in the winter. Unless the Jays can and will aim higher?
This was literally Ross Atkins' talking point in his presser. He basically said he doesn't think it was a mistake because the other team only scored 2, yet still doesn't want to take any responsibility for having any sort of hand in this decision.I still don't get the massive controversy surrounding that decision. If you tell me the other team scores 2 in a game, I'd still give us a decent chance to win. We scored 1 run the entire series, that's why we lost.
I still don't get the massive controversy surrounding that decision. If you tell me the other team scores 2 in a game, I'd still give us a decent chance to win. We scored 1 run the entire series, that's why we lost.
Yeah as ridiculous as it might be in a game-time decision I wouldn't consider it as a justifiable reason to fire someone (Atkins or Schneider). I thought of it as micromanaging but I don't think it ended up being as egregious as the media portrays. The boys just flat out didn't hit.
News flash: Vlad isn't good enough anymore to "squander years" of him. He's closer to a non-tender candidate than he is to a guy teams can squander years of.It’s true, but how much hope do you have that Atkins will figure it out? So far, he has not built a balanced team yet. Went too heavy on D last winter. Can he correct it? I really don’t want to squander more years of Bo, Vladdy, and the starting rotation. The window can close fast if he doesn’t figure out a way to build a good balanced team. Although, Vladdy needs to figure his own shit out because he wasn't helping the situation.
And it's just as easy to suggest that had Berrios been left in, he would have let in 0 runs as opposed to 2.I still don't get the massive controversy surrounding that decision. If you tell me the other team scores 2 in a game, I'd still give us a decent chance to win. We scored 1 run the entire series, that's why we lost.
News flash: Vlad isn't good enough anymore to "squander years" of him. He's closer to a non-tender candidate than he is to a guy teams can squander years of.
It’s true, but how much hope do you have that Atkins will figure it out? So far, he has not built a balanced team yet. Went too heavy on D last winter. Can he correct it? I really don’t want to squander more years of Bo, Vladdy, and the starting rotation. The window can close fast if he doesn’t figure out a way to build a good balanced team. Although, Vladdy needs to figure his own shit out because he wasn't helping the situation.
I still don't get the massive controversy surrounding that decision. If you tell me the other team scores 2 in a game, I'd still give us a decent chance to win. We scored 1 run the entire series, that's why we lost.
It doesn't say it was Click who made the call. It says he was "involved" which could literally mean any level of involvement. Heck, he could have been against it and that would still have him technically involved. lolOh no, Atkins leaked the Click screw up to protect his job
It doesn't say it was Click who made the call. It says he was "involved" which could literally mean any level of involvement. Heck, he could have been against it and that would still have him technically involved. lol
I don’t think that’s the implication here.
And I’m a fan of Click.
I understand the implication the leaker wanted to give off. I'm just saying the words are ambiguous enough to make it true regardless of the level of involvement. That way it covers the leaker's ass while also having its intended effect. The word involved is doing a lot of heavy lifting in the sentence.I don’t think that’s the implication here.
And I’m a fan of Click.