Buffalo roster is almost a full year younger than the Habs and their management refuse to spend to improve.
Yeah for sure, I agree that the Sabres are absolute cowards, but there is no way we stay ahead of them over 82 IMO. Our 3rd best overall forward is Sean Monahan, and while I do think Buffalo's core is overrated, there is just no comparison in the depth of talent between these two teams at the moment.
Seattle overachieved last season, they finished 4th two years ago. They don't have any game breaking talent to get them out of where they are.
Our top end isn't any better, and Seattle's depth is stronger than ours (especially with Newhook & Dach injured). I don't think Seattle is particularly great, but the Habs' record is a mirage. We're a bottom 5-7ish team that's currently getting a lot of OT luck, and I think Seattle is more of a mushy middle ~78-82 point team by the end of the year.
Calgary are apparently already planning to be sellers at the deadline and aiming for a re-tool this off-season.
So are we. The only reason we won't sell as much as Calgary is there isn't enough left to sell anymore. Calgary is probably the most likely of the non-obvious tankers to stay behind us but they're not really going to be able to trade everyone, it'll probably end up being just Lindholm and Hanifin and I think they still have enough in place to finish ahead of us.
I also don't expect the Habs to have a long 7-9 games losing stretch this season, outside maybe post deadline if they do lots of trades and have to add some of the prospects in the AHL to fill the holes.
I wouldn't count on any team necessarily losing 7 games in a row in today's NHL, but I don't see why we wouldn't expect this roster to go through some really bad stretches. Jake Evans is our 2C, Savard is our #2D, and we'll probably trade at least Monahan at the deadline. The 3rd line of Armia/Dvorak/Gallagher is probably the only line or D pairing on the roster that is appropriately slotted, every other line is not really up to NHL standard for its role in the lineup at the moment. Justin Barron is categorically not a top 4 defenceman at this stage in his career, Anderson is not and will never be a legitimate top 6 forward, etc.
I think we're in a pretty "good" spot where IMO the only way we will stay out of the bottom 5-8 range is if the Slafkovsky/Suzuki/Caufield line catches fire and sustains 1st line production the rest of the year which would be a very positive reason to be picking something like 12th instead of 6th.