LaP
Registered User
Obviously it plays a role but usually the culture will be set by the guys you draft. The culture in Pittsburg was set by Crosby and Malkin. The Culture in Washington was set by Ovechkin. The culture in Edmonton is slowly set by McJesus and Draisatl. The culture in Colorado was set by BigMac. Culture in LA was set by Kopitar and Doughty. TB by Hedman, Stamkos and Kuch.Kinda like the reasoning that "drafting the right guys" is all it takes... Ignoring the role that coaching, culture & communication play in setting prospects up for success
Tanking for the sake of acquiring highly rated prospects is not sufficient to build a contender. Buffalo is a very good example of this... Akin to "building via the draft" while not adding any 1st round picks over a decade of that stated approach.
Fortunately we've got a leadership group in place that seem to grasp the big picture, and are methodically putting the various pieces in place to build a culture of excellence with an emphasis on adding & nurturing elite talent.
Future is bright
There's a few exceptions like Panarin in NYR and Chara in Boston but most of the time if the kids you draft are not good enough to set a culture then you wont go anywhere and signing a bunch of vets like Giroux wont change that. Dahlin, Power, Savoie, Cozens, Mittelsstadt, Quinn are the ones who will need to figure it out in the upcoming years in Buffalo. Anyone who think those guys can't make the playoffs because of some sort of culture BS is delusional imo. They can't make it cause they are not good enough yet. If they would all be worthy of the rank they have been drafted the team would make the playoffs easily.
Last edited: