That is simply your opinion and I don’t agree with it. His skating is below average and hasn’t improved since he was 13. A small, undersized, poor moving dman isn’t someone I would take a top 5 pick on.Kiviharju has always been at the top of the hockey hierarchy. He never disappointed. He crossed all the categories at a very high speed despite a major injury. This certainty of Kiviharju's collapse in your mind surprises me.
Nick Ebert had not accomplished 10% of what Kiviharju has accomplished sportingly since he was 10 years old. His case is rather comparable to Caden Price and Cameron Allen.
His lack of skating is greatly exaggerated. Overall, I'm pretty skeptical of this argument. I was sold big, fast centers that I find slow and clumsy, I was sold slow defenders that I find correct. For me Kiviharju is far from slow. This aspect coexists with exceptional qualities. In skill he is clearly the best defenseman of the 2000 generation, his offensive and defensive hockey IQ is extremely high.
Do not insist on struggling to say that Kiviharju is the case of a player who was praised as a child and who will not have a professional career.
Because he is the perfect counter-example of the player who has constantly confirmed and who arrived on the professional circuit at 17 despite a year of injury.
This coming year is a big prove it year for him. If there isn’t much progress from last year in Liiga, how can you expect him to be a top 5-10 pick? They don’t draft based on how good you were when you were 12.