Deadpool8812
Registered User
- Feb 10, 2018
- 13,275
- 16,944
The second dream team of veteran NHL coaches!If the Flyers really tried to gauge Tort’s interest on potentially being an AC….Jesus Christ.![]()
The amazing part is that there are people in here defending Fletcher.![]()
Ranking the NHL coaching openings – and the best fits for each
Some vacancies have appealing markets. Others have appealing teams. Others have low expectations.www.dailyfaceoff.com
"We're in a good place." - Charles Fletcher
Probably has as much truth to it as San Filippo's report that the Flyers offered Ristolainen a 6-year, $37.5M contract and he rejected it.If the Flyers really tried to gauge Tort’s interest on potentially being an AC….Jesus Christ.![]()
I'm not hearing him mentioned as a particularly strong candidate anywhere else. If he wants the job, he'll probably still be there after the rest of the coaching carousel stops spinning, so it's worth investigating other options.If Torts wants the job, you gotta jump on that opportunity
If Torts wants the job, you gotta jump on that opportunity
The worst thing that ever happened to this franchise is winning those two cups and permanently branding this dogshit franchise as the home of goons and retirement home of every overrated shitter who played on those teams.
That's why they're still trying to emulate that embarrassing theme 50 years later and why we're going to be a dumpster franchise for the foreseeable future.
32 Thoughts mentioned Mike Vellucci of Pittsburgh as someone the Flyers interviewed. I believe Jim Rutherford brought him over from Carolina.
He has been in management too, so that's an interesting one.If he can bring Sullivan hockey here than im interested.
32 Thoughts mentioned Mike Vellucci of Pittsburgh as someone the Flyers interviewed. I believe Jim Rutherford brought him over from Carolina.
FtfyOur owner couldn't even talk about the roster without only referring to guys that Fletcher had just happened to mention while omitting obvious big names. He's not setting anything except "make me money."
It sure sounds like the organization is split between those who want to repeat 2018, where Scott/Holmgren fired Scott and hired Fletcher with a "win now' mandate, and those who see this past season as evidence that a win now strategy would be futile and they need to spend 2-3 years reloading, adding a couple top tier young players and developing the large group of prospects who've arrived the last couple years.
So you interview Trotz, Torts and ??? on one hand, interview Vellucci, and some other development oriented HC candidates on the other. In effect, covering your bets while the PTB try to come to a consensus.
And it would explain why Fletcher is saying they need to add some top young players under 25, that they won't take 5 years or longer to rebuild and that they expect to compete now (similar to what Hextall said while rebuilding about staying competitive) - he doesn't know what his mandate will be so he's covering all the bases.
Tocchet will probably get at least a courtesy interview.Velluci, Muller, Montgomery v Torts, Trotz ???