Philadelphia Flyers
To say the Flyers are, well, a mess might be charitable. They finished 29th in the league, 39 points out of the second wildcard spot in the Eastern Conference. They had a minus-87 goal differential and the sad part is the goaltending was actually pretty good. They were 31st in the NHL in goals for, and their power play was dead last. They fired their head coach, Alain Vigneault, and then left Mike Yeo to try and make chicken salad out of, well, you know, the rest of the way. They traded away long-time captain Claude Giroux at the deadline, the ultimate waving of the organizational white flag. Fans have stayed away in droves. GM Chuck Fletcher has tried to plug the many holes in the lineup and there have been promises to spend more money on scouting and development but, well, hard to imagine this team has been as low as it is now in many, many moons.
Pros
Well, the bar’s set pretty low in Philadelphia now for what constitutes success. And even though ownership/senior management insists it’s not really a rebuild, blah, blah, blah, no coach is coming in here with the realistic expectation of anything but trying to slowly put the pieces back together. And it’s Philadelphia. The team will pay top dollar in the hopes of stopping the bleeding. Travel is easy. Fans are knowledgeable and invested (except when they vote with their feet and wallets when the product is substandard). There’s a franchise goalie in Carter Hart as long as the losing doesn’t break him. Hopefully defenseman Ryan Ellis will get better (healthier) and help bring stability to the lineup.
Cons
Where do you start? Hard to imagine this job appeals to the high-end free agent coaches like Trotz, DeBoer or Tocchet even though Tocchet has a long history with the club, because there are lots more attractive openings. In fact, one long-time NHL executive and former player noted that it’s shocking that of all the openings the Flyers would be easily the least desirable. “That’s not good. At all,” the observer said. At the crux of this, for anyone considering the job is this question: what is the real mandate here? Promising young players seem to have hit a wall, so is that coaching, development or just mistakes in talent evaluation? The transition from the venerable Ed Snider to the corporate monolith Comcast Spectacor as the ultimate decision-makers on hirings, firings and direction led by Dave Scott has not been seamless. There is also the specter of the old Flyers that continues to haunt this club. It caused friction with former GM Ron Hextall with complaints that he wasn’t open to including those figures who remain around the team. A new coach has to decide how he or she will approach the very tangible element of the Flyer dynamic. This is a critical hire for Fletcher (duh, really?) and after Hextall’s experiment with long-time collegiate coach Dave Hakstol cost both Hextall and Hakstol their jobs, paving the way for Chuck Fletcher to arrive and install Vigneault as head coach, there isn’t an obvious path to a new coach for a team that has no obvious path road to respectability.
Who Fits?
Let’s assume the big boys aren’t going to be a fit. Chuck Fletcher needs to find the next Jon Cooper, a teacher who can accelerate the learning curve of the team’s young talent, then take them the next steps back to playoff contention and to being a legitimate contender. And Fletcher needs to have ownership’s backing to do it. Montgomery has a strong connection to the Flyer organization, seems to have truly embraced sobriety and has been an important part of the Blues’ renaissance as part of Craig Berube’s staff. Gronborg may be a better fit in Detroit (see above) but again, if Fletcher is looking to move out of the comfort zone of recycling an existing NHL head coach, Gronborg’s resume is impressive. I can see Green fitting here as well.