LegionOfDoom91
Registered User
The Flyers will meet with Trotz this week. They’re not in a hurry to name a coach. They want to take their time to be thorough even if it means missing out on a coach potentially.
The Flyers will meet with Trotz this week. They’re not in a hurry to name a coach. They want to take their time to be thorough even if it means missing out on a coach potentially.
Aka Chuck will get around to making a decision when he feels like it. No rush.
If he brings back Yeo, it’ll be a rerun of last season. That should cost both Scott and him their jobs. Can’t see those two guys putting their heads on the block for Yeo. Fletcher maybe but not Scott.Any reason to take as much time as possible to force himself to sign Yeo.
They're not bringing back Yeo.
The fact that they're in no rush to hire someone either means they're still hashing out internal disagreement, or more likely, the top candidates are working for playoff teams and they've already dismissed the retreads who were available.
They're going to interview Trotz just to deflect criticism, even if the target(s) are someone else. From a marketing standpoint, ignoring Trotz would look really bad to a sizeable proportion of the fan base. I doubt Trotz has any interest in Philly, Vegas sounds perfect for him, a talented veteran under performing team. Why would Trotz want another Islander situation, just enough talent to lose in the playoffs.
Winnipeg is Trotz best option , not Vegas. . Top goalie and enough offence that they can still score under him.
They would win ALOT of games 2-0 or 3-2.
The Flyers will meet with Trotz this week. They’re not in a hurry to name a coach. They want to take their time to be thorough even if it means missing out on a coach potentially.
I think they will get a good coach. I want them to get a coach that won’t raise the floor artificially by playing high end Defense. But that could happen with Trotz. I think Montgomery would be a good coach and could be the most likely option from a few points of view.Does anyone here have a shred of hope they make a good decision with this hire?
Or will it be the usual, they could have chosen a,b or c and been fine, but picked Trashy McJackass? The whole proven track record of success comment makes me lean towards ol' Trashy. Why do these hockey people love to drop coins in a dried up wishing well?
I mean you have the damned resources, budget and time to leave no stone unturned and get the very best option FFS! They haven't even brought someone in yet, and I'm getting heated. Stupid Flyers brass, suck it.
Sorry for the rant.
Sounds like they are going to wait it out for Montgomery.
I think they will get a good coach. I want them to get a coach that won’t raise the floor artificially by playing high end Defense. But that could happen with Trotz. I think Montgomery would be a good coach and could be the most likely option from a few points of view.
Unless they back into a stroke of good luck and end up with Trotz, no. Even then, that's a good decision, not a great one.Does anyone here have a shred of hope they make a good decision with this hire?
Or will it be the usual, they could have chosen a,b or c and been fine, but picked Trashy McJackass? The whole proven track record of success comment makes me lean towards ol' Trashy. Why do these hockey people love to drop coins in a dried up wishing well?
I mean you have the damned resources, budget and time to leave no stone unturned and get the very best option FFS! They haven't even brought someone in yet, and I'm getting heated. Stupid Flyers brass, suck it.
Sorry for the rant.
Disagree. Unless Chevy agrees to move Scheiffle as part of the agreement no coach wants to walk into that mess. Plus the pressure of being home and not being able to go anywhere without being harassed I’d go with Vegas or Philly. But then again I live hereWinnipeg is Trotz best option , not Vegas. . Top goalie and enough offence that they can still score under him.
They would win ALOT of games 2-0 or 3-2.
I could certainly see it. But those comments make it seem that they are not going to hire someone available right now because they are available right now. Sounds like Trotz. I am sure they would be happy to get him but it feels like they are waiting for someone else to shake loose. Montgomery makes sense in that scenario. I can’t see the pens or bruins changing much.I think they’d want Trotz, not sure if Trotz would want them though. I think they’re trying to do some beforehand PR to try to mitigate things if/when Trotz picks somewhere else. Pretty much every team with an opening is interested in Trotz. So just odds alone aren’t in the favor.
The Isles are/were a wet dream for this organization. A team that’s short of talent compared to the top teams but gets into the playoffs & overachieves. So I find it hard to believe they wouldn’t want Trotz.
There is the possibility that they have a shred of a glimpse of reality amongst them, and are using Marek to put out a team-friendly interpretation for why Trotz will ultimately turn us down. That way, the Authentics will be more chill when we don't automatically get the biggest name.I could certainly see it. But those comments make it seem that they are not going to hire someone available right now because they are available right now. Sounds like Trotz. I am sure they would be happy to get him but it feels like they are waiting for someone else to shake loose. Montgomery makes sense in that scenario. I can’t see the pens or bruins changing much.
We have no big offensive talent to smother anyways so who cares. Also Nelson had 37 goals this year, but everyone ignores that.But Trotz won a SC so everyone is falling over the guy. They’re forgetting that he’s a defensive coach first who has usually smothered the offensive capacity of his teams. If your club is defensively deficient, then maybe he’s your guy. However it’s going to come at a cost. Your offense is going to rot and I hope that your fans like boring hockey. Also he will play mediocre vets ahead of the organization’s young guys so don’t expect much player development. For the Flyers, I don’t see a great fit.
Who gives a flying f*** about any of our opinions?What coach is available right now that you'd actually want?
Exactly. We dont have G, Jake, or Ghost anymore. What we do have is decent forward depth, a few underachieving dmen entering their prime years, and a goalie with a lot of upside. A well structured, hardworking, oppurtunistic team with a stud goalie is this teams only path forward. Trotz is the guy to do that.We have no big offensive talent to smother anyways so who cares. Also Nelson had 37 goals this year, but everyone ignores that.