The Mikhail Grigorenko Thread Part II (assigned to Québec)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jame

Registered User
Sep 4, 2002
52,673
9,037
Florida
Yeah, well good luck with the rebuild with that attitude. That's the reason your rebuild is doomed. Mishandling top prospects...I could only imagine what other prospects in Sabres organization thinks.

The other prospects can see tht they will have to work and earn their opportunities... Sets a great example for all of them

Being a 1st round pick, isn't an automatic path to a job.
 

wnysupport

Registered User
Jun 27, 2011
567
212
So mishandling his development--being referred to as "abuse," "disrespect," and "mistreatment" by some in this thread--excuses his refusal to report?

Zadorov is Russian. Zadorov is better than Sulzer and Weber. Did the Sabres disrespect, abuse, or mistreat him by sending him back to London?

Zadorov is 18 - so it's more comparable to last year with Grigorenko...in which he did go back to the Q. It's a different situation
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Jim Bob

RIP RJ
Feb 27, 2002
58,814
39,845
Rochester, NY
Yeah, well good luck with the rebuild with that attitude. That's the reason your rebuild is doomed. Mishandling top prospects...I could only imagine what other prospects in Sabres organization thinks.

Regier mishandled Grigorenko by rushing him to the NHL. He should have been in Quebec last year and this year.

How has Murray mishandled him at all? He isn't NHL ready and can't play in the AHL.

I don't see how Murray did anything wrong.

:shakehead

And what other top prospect have they mishandled?
 

Samsonite23

All Hail King Tuch
Sponsor
Jul 2, 2011
7,951
2,277
Downtown Buffalo
Yeah, well good luck with the rebuild with that attitude. That's the reason your rebuild is doomed. Mishandling top prospects...I could only imagine what other prospects in Sabres organization thinks.

The way you're speaking, you think a 19 year old kid is more important than the entire organization.
 

Tompa8989*

Guest
Are you serious? Maybe it's time for you to place some blame on the immature kid

It's not his rebuild that gets set back 5 years cause of this. Im sure the Lightning didn't tell Drouin to shut up and go back to the juniors without a good talk about what plans the organization has for him and a justification on why he has to play in QMJHL.
 

ZeroPT*

Guest
So mishandling his development--being referred to as "abuse," "disrespect," and "mistreatment" by some in this thread--excuses his refusal to report?

Zadorov is Russian. Zadorov is better than Sulzer and Weber. Did the Sabres disrespect, abuse, or mistreat him by sending him back to London?

This.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Jacob582

Registered User
Oct 16, 2012
10,158
3,776
Obviously this is all caused by that terrible rule than prohibits Grigorenko from being able to play in the AHL. I'm sure he'd go to Rochester without so much as a whimper. And in a perfect world, he would have played in Rochester for the better part of the past two seasons and would be much better because of it.

I don't think that it is obvious that this was caused by the rule that prohibits Grigorenko from being in the AHL.

There are million$ of reasons Grigorenko and his agent would be as unhappy going to the A as the Q.

Who do you think complained to the union about Grigo going to the AHL for the conditioning assignment? He didn't go willingly then; why would he go without a whimper now if he was eligible?
 

ZeroPT*

Guest
It's not his rebuild that gets set back 5 years cause of this. Im sure the Lightning didn't tell Drouin to shut up and go back to the juniors without a good talk about what plans the organization has for him and a justification on why he has to play in QMJHL.

Alright I'll bite. I'm going to take your position with it, here's what you're saying:
The sabres management has set back the rebuild by 5 years by sending a top prospect back to junior.
:help:
 

wnysupport

Registered User
Jun 27, 2011
567
212
I don't think that it is obvious that this was caused by the rule that prohibits Grigorenko from being in the AHL.

There are million$ of reasons Grigorenko and his agent would be as unhappy going to the A as the Q.

Who do you think complained to the union about Grigo going to the AHL for the conditioning assignment? He didn't go willingly then; why would he go without a whimper now if he was eligible?

If that were the case, and he was able to (not saying he is, because obviously we know without certain things happening, he isn't) - then I would agree he is much more of a risk.
 

Moskau

Registered User
Jun 30, 2004
19,978
4,743
WNY
It's not his rebuild that gets set back 5 years cause of this. Im sure the Lightning didn't tell Drouin to shut up and go back to the juniors without a good talk about what plans the organization has for him and a justification on why he has to play in QMJHL.
And Buffalo did that with Grigorenko and he didn't want anything to do with it because he's a *****. Happens with far too many young Russians.
 

Jim Bob

RIP RJ
Feb 27, 2002
58,814
39,845
Rochester, NY
It's not his rebuild that gets set back 5 years cause of this. Im sure the Lightning didn't tell Drouin to shut up and go back to the juniors without a good talk about what plans the organization has for him and a justification on why he has to play in QMJHL.

I'm sure Murray told Grigorenko why he was sending him to Quebec and Grigorenko just didn't want to hear it based on plenty of the quotes he's given this year.
 

ZeroPT*

Guest
No, not this. Zadorovs' situation is akin to last year with Grigorenko...

What? No it's not. Age doesn't matter with this situation, they're mere months apart. Girgorenko played in the NHL under stupid management and was sent down. The same happened to Zadorov. Why does Grigorenko get this special treatment? Is it so hard for people to recognize that he's being a little brat? I've been cut from teams before, I didn't pout and stomp my feet on the ground. I took it to heart and made it my life goal to show those ******* up, and prove to them WHY they made the wrong decision.He's in the NHL, he's a pro. It's not because he's russian that this is happening, it's because HE is being a little brat, if Girgensons did the same I'd want him as far away from this group as possible, I'm starting to feel the same way about grigo.
 

Djp

Registered User
Jul 28, 2012
24,675
6,031
Alexandria, VA
No, it's the NHL way.

Did the Sabres talk to Pominville before he was waived to Rochester in 2005-06?

It's not like Grigorenko is a seasoned vet like Ryan Miller who a GM should talk to about his future. At this point, Grigorenko has to roll with what the Sabres management wants.

The issue is that Grigs is in that no mans land.....playing in the Q doesnt help him.

He would have no issues playing in Rochester.

What he would like is for the Q to release him and allow him to play in Rochester.

Pominville did have a talk with Ruff and Darcy when he was sent down to Rochester. He would want to know why he didnt make the team and what he had to do to earn a call up.



I have said this before---CHL imports should be allowed to get bought out or released when they are in their last year which would then allow them to go to the AHL.
 

ZeroPT*

Guest
The issue is that Grigs is in that no mans land.....playing in the Q doesnt help him.

He would have no issues playing in Rochester.

What he would like is for the Q to release him and allow him to play in Rochester.

Pominville did have a talk with Ruff and Darcy when he was sent down to Rochester. He would want to know why he didnt make the team and what he had to do to earn a call up.



I have said this before---CHL imports should be allowed to get bought out or released when they are in their last year which would then allow them to go to the AHL.
OR the NHL team could pay off the team with a compensation of some sort.In general I agree.
 

chadthestampede

The Humanoid Typhoon
Jan 20, 2011
876
2
The issue is that Grigs is in that no mans land.....playing in the Q doesnt help him.

He would have no issues playing in Rochester.

What he would like is for the Q to release him and allow him to play in Rochester.

Pominville did have a talk with Ruff and Darcy when he was sent down to Rochester. He would want to know why he didnt make the team and what he had to do to earn a call up.



I have said this before---CHL imports should be allowed to get bought out or released when they are in their last year which would then allow them to go to the AHL.

Wow I didn't know Grigs agent posted here.
 

Tompa8989*

Guest
The way you're speaking, you think a 19 year old kid is more important than the entire organization.

That's not my point but i believe you have to be diplomatic in some way when dealing with prospects, and especially top prospects that is expected to play a top 6 role for the next 10 years. It's just the road to failure if you just act like you are god. The best managers is the one that does not only care about the well being of the company/organization but also the well being of the employed/players.

In this case it's obvious that the management only cared about the organiation in the short term. Which is sad for the fans in Buffalo who will have to wait a bunch of extra years to be competetive.
 

wnysupport

Registered User
Jun 27, 2011
567
212
What? No it's not. Age doesn't matter with this situation, they're mere months apart. Girgorenko played in the NHL under stupid management and was sent down. The same happened to Zadorov. Why does Grigorenko get this special treatment? Is it so hard for people to recognize that he's being a little brat? I've been cut from teams before, I didn't pout and stomp my feet on the ground. I took it to heart and made it my life goal to show those ******* up, and prove to them WHY they made the wrong decision.

It's not age, I'm making the point that Zadorovs situation this year is not the same as Grigorenko this year. It was more comparable to last year in which Grigorenko DID go back to the Q. This year is his 2nd season, not 1st.

Should he get special treatment, no - I agree with that. However the point was that Zadorov went back to the Q...well so did Grigorenko last year.
 

ZeroPT*

Guest
It's not age, I'm making the point that Zadorovs situation this year is not the same as Grigorenko this year. It was more comparable to last year in which Grigorenko DID go back to the Q. This year is his 2nd season, not 1st.

Should he get special treatment, no - I agree with that. However the point was that Zadorov went back to the Q...well so did Grigorenko last year.

But why is it so hard for a man like him to understand that he's not ready for this and that this decision is the new group's opinion on what's best for his development
 

Jim Bob

RIP RJ
Feb 27, 2002
58,814
39,845
Rochester, NY
That's not my point but i believe you have to be diplomatic in some way when dealing with prospects, and especially top prospects that is expected to play a top 6 role for the next 10 years. It's just the road to failure if you just act like you are god. The best managers is the one that does not only care about the well being of the company/organization but also the well being of the employed/players.

In this case it's obvious that the management only cared about the organiation in the short term. Which is sad for the fans in Buffalo who will have to wait a bunch of extra years to be competetive.

Explain to me how Grigorenko is the key player to whether or not this team will be competitive on a much faster time frame or not.

I think you are vastly overestimating Grigorenko's potential value to the rebuild.
 

Sabresfansince1980

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 29, 2011
11,215
5,764
from Wheatfield, NY
But why is it so hard for a man like him to understand that he's not ready for this and that this decision is the new group's opinion on what's best for his development

I'm going to hope it's just immaturity and bad agent advice and that he'll change his mind, as opposed to an entitlement/attitude problem that will doom his future.
 

Samsonite23

All Hail King Tuch
Sponsor
Jul 2, 2011
7,951
2,277
Downtown Buffalo
That's not my point but i believe you have to be diplomatic in some way when dealing with prospects, and especially top prospects that is expected to play a top 6 role for the next 10 years. It's just the road to failure if you just act like you are god. The best managers is the one that does not only care about the well being of the company/organization but also the well being of the employed/players.

In this case it's obvious that the management only cared about the organiation in the short term. Which is sad for the fans in Buffalo who will have to wait a bunch of extra years to be competetive.


The reason they are sending him to juniors is because keeping him in the nhl will hinder his development. He'd be in the ahl in a few months.

And if you honestly think the organization is thinking about the short term at this moment then you are absolutely blind.
 

EichHart

Registered User
Jul 3, 2011
14,486
4,843
Hamburg, NY
Explain to me how Grigorenko is the key player to whether or not this team will be competitive on a much faster time frame or not.

I think you are vastly overestimating Grigorenko's potential value to the rebuild.

What? When he was drafted nearly the entire sabres forum said we finally found our number one C. Seeing as the Num 1 C is the most important position on an NHL team how does it not make Grigs extremely important to this rebuild?
 

Tompa8989*

Guest
And Buffalo did that with Grigorenko and he didn't want anything to do with it because he's a *****. Happens with far too many young Russians.

I'm sure Murray told Grigorenko why he was sending him to Quebec and Grigorenko just didn't want to hear it based on plenty of the quotes he's given this year.

Ok, let's say he sat down and told him why and what he had to do to earn a spot next year, what did Grigo said in response? Either he tod Murray to go **** himself and stormed out of the room, then Murray made the ''send down call''.

Or Grigo said okey, that's fine, then Murray made the call and then Grigo said, hahaha i'm not gonna report to the Ramparts, ***** you!

It's obvious that the communication wasn't clear enough.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad