Very weak arguments.
First of all, I didn’t say this game is proof. I’ve been saying this throughout. You can try to wiggle your way out of his stats being an improvement, but they legitimately are. You can’t just take away a player’s best games on the scoresheet. There are also games where a player doesn’t get on the scoresheet and they should’ve. That’s the NHL. It should all even out. And his stats have also gotten better every season of his career.
You mention his TOI only marginally improving, but it has more to do with where he’s playing in the lineup. He’s playing in a top 6 spot. He’s not on a stupid designated 3rd line kid line where 3 early 20’s are supposed to magically create a great line when none of them have previously been top 6 in this league. Now he’s playing with true top 6 players. That makes a huge difference.
Also, you simply don’t know what you are saying if you think Lafreniere wasn’t blamed disproportionately for the playoffs. It’s stupid to blame a young player in this league on your third line. What do you expect he becomes, Batman? He is what he is. He’s not an NHL star. He’s probably going to have 7 game slumps. It happened at a bad time, but the blame should be going to the veteran players that are the stars and are paid like them. It shouldn’t be dumping on a kid because he hasn’t hit the expected heights. Does this need to be brought up in every discussion about him? No one contests its validity. Does every RNH discussion have to be about the same thing?
Lastly, bringing up MacKinnon and Hughes is completely irrelevant. Two players in different situations. It’s possible Lafreniere was never as good as them or it’s possible his early NHL development impacted his ability to reach where they will. It’s still possible Lafreniere reaches his ceiling later than most 1OA’s, so it might be that we are both wrong on this. Regardless, you are bringing up something no one contests. You’ve created a controversy that no one is arguing about.
Yes, he's technically "improved", but he hasn't made any leaps that show me he will be a top 6 producer. He strikes me as a middle 6 tweener at best. Perhaps he does have some games where he should've been on the scoresheet, literally every player does... But he also has a plethora of games where he wasn't and had no business being on the scoresheet. The latter seems to outnumber the former to a degree that leads me to believe his improvement while existent, is not sufficient.
Even with this top 6 placement, he's produced at exactly the same rate outside of his game yesterday. How does anything about this season (outside the game yesterday) prove that it made a significant difference? I watched his shifts from that game and while he was at the right place at the right time for some decent puck movement and opportunities, he didn't seem dynamic or show an approach to the game that necessarily replicates that type of production over the course of a season.
Unless I've been on a different forum than you completely, I can confidently say I didn't see people disproportionately blaming him for the Rangers series loss. He caught flack and was ridiculed but I didn't see anybody say he was the sole reason they lost that series. The latter would be disproportionate, the former is completely fair. Maybe I didn't dig enough, but the extreme opinions of a select few people don't mean that his performance in the playoffs isn't notably bad and reflective of people's opinions of him.
Mackinnon and Hughes are just two examples but my point still stands. Players that are top 6 or top-line material tend to have elements of their game that shine through, either that or they are moderately skilled in multiple areas and can produce consistently. Like I said, Lafreniere hasn't shown that throughout his career and I didn't see all too much of it yesterday. None of those plays wouldn't have been pulled off by a bottom-six forward. He's a bit faster which contributed to that 2 on 1 goal but he doesn't seem to be any more skilled, just better conditioned. I don't think that's enough to make a player a 1st liner. That's why I mentioned the non linear jump/"everything clicking".
You said he's going to become a top 6 forward, I said that I don't believe so and gave my reasons. That's not creating some false controversy.