ChiHawks10
Registered User
Yes, you should. We could have a informed conversation how its a completely murky case. How Sopel and Boynton claimed that Aldrich was "trying to grab him". Thats a lot different then he was sexually assaulted. How a player in 2014 in the AHL was taunting him about receiving a blow job.
There seems to be so many different stories on what people knew and the rumors going around. What Beach told who. I don't know how you can morally write someone off and then spout it online without knowing the truth. Especially if you are just making stuff up about practicing together and letters of recommendation and such. That's me tho.
It was actually multiple players chasing him around the ice calling him "Homophobic Slur".
And I'm pretty sure you have me confused with someone else at this point... I have never mentioned anything about letters of recommendation, and have never made anything up.
The stuff I said about Black Aces was generalized about ALL of the Black Aces around the league... and it's not made up... lol. They regularly practice with players that are on the ice more. Guys who are working on different aspects of their game. Your 3rd and 4th line guys who stay on the ice when most your stars or top 6/top 4 get off the ice. There are some players who want more practice/ice time, and the black aces usually work with them. They also interact with coaches. They travel with the team. They go into the locker room. They stay at the same hotels as the team. They eat meals with them, and go out with them. Absolutely none of that is made up...
Yes, it's murky. I don't believe all the vague nonsense from the coaches/staff interviewed. I don't believe their response that none of them remember the details of what was discussed in any of these meetings or phone calls. You don't forget something like that happening, or the details of it. It's something that will get burned into your head. Their responses all seem like they're covering shit up about what they all knew. Like they were prepped years before to keep their stories straight.
And AGAIN... I'm basing my opinion of Q on what I DO KNOW. His responses regarding the playoffs, winnings cups, upsetting team chemistry, etc. And him lying about having no knowledge of it to cover his ass, and it turning out that he was present for the initial meeting, and DID know about the incident. Did you need the details of that, too? How he was called in after it had already started after the win, and thought it was odd for that to happen?
Jesus, I can't believe I have to write that for like the 5th or 6th time.
Last edited: