Still think we should've kept Eller and then added Shaw. That way we'd have two guys with one point in ten games.Are people really *****ing about eller in this thread? Really? The guy they replaced him with has one measly point more. ONE. While costing two 2nd rounders and paid more for the next 6 years. While one also plays on the PP with Therrien's favorite son while the other plays a more typical 3rd line role and PK. You can't play him as a defensive specialist and expect him to explode offensively at 27 years old even though all the signs pointed to hIm having potential. Didn't he lead the league in dzone starts at one point or something? We kept the worst center that has no value in this league and that's a fact.
It's like that whole Bergevin ******** saying galchenyuk may be or never be a center and then 5 years later winder why he's struggling at center! It's called development Pejorative Sluration. Neglect your kid for 5 years and see how they turn out.
Subban lining up his first Head To Head win!
The result would be similar but we would have more of Eller patrolling the offensive zone with the puck and nothing ever happening.Still think we should've kept Eller and then added Shaw. That way we'd have two guys with one point in ten games.![]()
Subban lining up his first Head To Head win!
That's fine. If he's logging defensive minutes and keeping the puck at the other end I'm totally okay with that.The result would be similar but we would have more of Eller patrolling the offensive zone with the puck and nothing ever happening.
Still think we should've kept Eller and then added Shaw. That way we'd have two guys with one point in ten games.![]()
Bad coaching. There's no way Subban is that bad. He probably miss MT now.There's a +21 differential between Weber and Subban
Bad coaching. There's no way Subban is that bad. He probably miss MT now.
Could have sworn he was way better when playing under JM. (not that I have been watching his Nashville games...)
Maybe Subban is feeling the pressure of wanting to show habs lost the trade. Despite his faults he's usually a steady d-man. His mistakes however are so unforced and glaring that they cause a lot of attention. If he's making more of those, he's not focused.
That being said, I wouldn't know as I didn't watch much of Nashville.
I don't think its pressure. I think he just lost a bit of his passion. He went from a city where hockey is religious to one where it's not even the most popular sport. He loves the spotlight, but he's not getting much in Nashville. He also lost out on many connections (friends, hospital, etc). He doesn't seem to be trying as hard as when he was in MTL. On the fail hit that he did (which resulted to Duclair's goal), he looked lazy.
I didn't really watch much of Nashville and I don't have any personal connection with Subban, so take it with a grain of salt.
You're describing paradise. Most players would love to play there with no media attention.I don't agree about the spotlight thing, but the passion thing is an interesting point of view... Knowing how intense the guy is both on and off the ice, him realizing that what was once a dream is not just a job, might not be that easy.
What surrounded the Habs, fans at practices, dozens of journalists after a pre-season game, the croud etc. and you go to a place where there max 3 journalists at an official PC, maybe one or two media guys following the team, etc... It must be like living in two totally different worlds.
You're describing paradise. Most players would love to play there with no media attention.
You're describing paradise. Most players would love to play there with no media attention.
If it doesn't work for him in Nashville Bergy could accommodate him.well, for some like P.K., playing for his childhood team, in a great hockey city, etc may have been paradise you know.
You're describing paradise. Most players would love to play there with no media attention.
Who knows what it is. I just wish his success. He did nothing bad to Montreal, only good.