We know this isn't the case, though. We know that Connor Brown wasn't interested in extending with the Ottawa Senators because that's what Friedman reported during the Cup Finals. When the Senators approached him to begin talks he made it clear that he wanted to test the market.
So this put the team in a pretty difficult spot - either you move him during the summer for a somewhat 'soft' deal or you keep him as an own rental and assume all the risk that comes with that. They chose to move him which I think is prudent.
Imagine that the Senators decided to keep Brown for this season and he blew out his knee and walked for nothing this summer. The same people criticizing Dorion for shipping Brown out last summer would posting endlessly about how the GM lacks foresight and it was obvious that the situation should have been dealt with earlier. The poor guy can't win.
When it comes to Nick Paul I think the Senators made a fair offer for the player. Garrioch reported that the last offer to him was 11M over 4 years, or 2.75M per. Seems fairly reasonable for a guy that was a ~25 point bottom six/PK forward for us. He figured he could get more money and it worked out for him. People are just freaking out because the guy is on a shooting percentage heater since getting to Tampa. The guy was a 7% shooter over 225 games in Ottawa and now all of a sudden he's a 20% shooter? Nah. Same player he's always been.
Well, I am basing myself on what Benjiv1 once said. I have seen him call a lot of stuff in advance in the past so I tend to believe him.
But anyway, I'd rather get absolutely nothing and use him as a FULL year rental when our bottom-6 is clearly way below average, healthy or not (the TC scandal news had already surfaced when the Brown trade happened)
Dorion traded a recent 2nd round pick to get a past his prime Alex Burrows 6 years ago, why wouldn't we value Connor Brown more than a 2024 second when we are in a dire need for quality middle six players?
By the time that 2024 second round pick is ready to make an impact (IF it ever does), Batherson, Chabot and Tkachuk contracts will have expired... I don't see this as prudent when you need to get out of the NHL bottom-NHL for a few years now.
Butterfly effect makes it that Brown probably won't have been injured (it took almost 6 seasons before he missed his first NHL game), even if he did, then just too bad. At least we put ourselves in a much better position to be good, particularly after potentially losing Formenton
Note that I have never criticized Dorion for things he has no control about and injuries are one of these things. Roster construction and injury prevention is his responsibility though
2.75 AAV for Paul was lowball. A good pro scouting staff would have seen more in the player and pay him like the Lightning does. That's why they made the finals 3 years in a row and we are about to miss the playoffs for the 6th straight season. Look at how they snagged Hagel too. Brisebois is what I call a good GM
Personally, I am not freaking out about his offensive production. I am very annoyed because we are terrible 5 on 5
None of those things are relevant. We are clearly talking about our cap situation next season. Even with those 4 players gone, we do not have the cap space for all of Paul, Brown, Giroux, Zub and an additional ~4m top 4 defenseman.
ok so you opted to not highlight the term "dead cap"?
And how is Zaitsev not relevant? He has a 4.5 AAV next season... Dorion will probably have to waste more assets/money to fix just another one of his mistakes. Hope that the team gets sold before that though
Kelly is on a 1-way next season too
That being said, from your post I quoted (which was a new post, not a response to another post), I had no idea you were talking about only next season.