Speculation: The Athletic-“So, it’s easy to imagine a scenario in which the Ducks move on from Zegras..."

pth2

Registered User
Jan 7, 2018
3,485
2,763
Any trade will happen after the lottery - at the draft even. Ducks would need to be very high on 2 players in that range as they have their own pick that is likely to be top 5 as well. Ducks fans correct me if I'm wrong but what you need most are probably D-men, given that they take longer to develop usually trading for one that is a 2021-2023 draft pick has some merits. If I am the Ducks I would do Zegras- Reinbacher in an instant but if I am Montreal I don't touch that.

I doubt there is a trade here between these 2.
Similar thinking here, only I think they go for a RD drafted in 2016 or so, and who they feel warrants a long-term deal, and whose current team is looking at a rebuild/retool.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CDN24

Gliff

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 24, 2011
16,477
11,805
Middle Tennessee
It's very hard to know what is real and what isn't. Reporters make up things for clicks, and I've suggested before Zegras is a nice name to throw out there because Anaheim isn't a big media market, but Zegras is well-known around the league because of his flashier play, so mentioning him means clicks and little pushback. The problem is though, Anaheim truly could be looking at moving depth at C, and he has had contract issues, so it's perfectly possible for Anaheim to be looking at options, without being the ones pro-actively calling around
I think we can assume a reporter wouldnt make up that someone ISNT available considering that does the exact opposite of generating clicks with future stories...
 

John Mandalorian

2022 Avs: The First Dance
Nov 29, 2018
11,659
7,378
Top media members like the idiot who confidently said John Gibson was never going to play another game for the Anaheim Ducks?

It's pretty apparent that Hughes is using Seravelli to get his spin out there. So it's hard to blame Habs fans for thinking this way.

But it's also a little strange to step back and look at Seravelli recently calling Kekalainen and Grier the two worst GMs in the NHL. Why? Why is Hughes exempt from this? The Habs have been drafting around the same spot as the Blue Jackets and Sharks in reecent years.

It's apparent that Grier and Kekalainen weren't sharing information with Seravelli the way Hughes does. And this was Grier's and Kekalainen's punishment for not playing ball.

Also, worth noting, Seravelli's audience is Canadian. In terms of the NHL, this isn't something small. But it is a little like saying someone is "world famous in Liechtenstein" in that 70% of the league is based in the US. For all anyone knows, Grier and Kekalainen may not be aware of or care about Seravelli's comments. They may not be a part of the Canadian media ecosystem.
 

Chose

Loyal Habs fan
Aug 4, 2022
358
229
Montréal
It's pretty apparent that Hughes is using Seravelli to get his spin out there. So it's hard to blame Habs fans for thinking this way.

But it's also a little strange to step back and look at Seravelli recently calling Kekalainen and Grier the two worst GMs in the NHL. Why? Why is Hughes exempt from this? The Habs have been drafting around the same spot as the Blue Jackets and Sharks in reecent years.

It's apparent that Grier and Kekalainen weren't sharing information with Seravelli the way Hughes does. And this was Grier's and Kekalainen's punishment for not playing ball.

Also, worth noting, Seravelli's audience is Canadian. In terms of the NHL, this isn't something small. But it is a little like saying someone is "world famous in Liechtenstein" in that 70% of the league is based in the US. For all anyone knows, Grier and Kekalainen may not be aware of or care about Seravelli's comments. They may not be a part of the Canadian media ecosystem.
That feels like a reach, Kekalainen did not achieve much, and his boss also thought he wasn't good enough for the job.

And Hugues did start his rebuild only two years ago, and accomplished a lot. He is usually celebrated. Why would he be named in the worst GMs ?! Nobody but you reaching thinks that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Doublechin

viceroy

Registered User
Mar 5, 2011
1,895
960
Montreal suburbs
Lol that's a weird brag, but ok...
and yes we do, now excuse me while I go tell my family about that, they are going to be so proud of me. Life goal accomplished.

So glad that your ONLINE FORUM has so many posts. Such a flex!

What a bizarre comment. I’m sure half of those posts

in that 100 page thread are borderline Pulitzer Prize winning commentary.

Touched a nerve I guess. Not a flex, we just get a lot of traffic sunshine. That's why we shouldn't get called over any flake comments. We have a lot of fans, Greater Montreal has over 4 million in population. We don't have an NFL team, an NBA team or an MLB team. All us Montreal sports fans basically just have the Habs.

You guys in Anaheim/LA have tons of sports options. Everyone out here just throws their manic fandom on the Canadiens. You guys think crapping on us because of posts on a Zegras thread... If Dreger posted about the Habs trying to trade for Morgan Frost this morning on 690 there'd be 10 pages before nightfall.
 

John Mandalorian

2022 Avs: The First Dance
Nov 29, 2018
11,659
7,378
That feels like a reach, Kekalainen did not achieve much, and his boss also thought he wasn't good enough for the job.

And Hugues did start his rebuild only two years ago, and accomplished a lot. He is usually celebrated. Why would he be named in the worst GMs ?! Nobody but you reaching thinks that.

You're talking about the reputation of Hughes...and who helps shape that?

Kekalainen's time had run its course. There was some good and some bad. As a GM in a less than desirable NHL market, he took some chances and that likely led to his undoing.

His body of work is much greatet than Hughes. But you have to look at the positives as well as the negatives. Hughes has only GMed a bottom dwelling team - so far. That might change but what can you point to otherwise?
 

Rec T

Registered User
Jun 1, 2007
1,572
1,269
NKY
If they' really were giving up on a young talented C because of not being an ace defensively, then McTavish should be on the block too, as he's been worse defensively than Zegras. That's how stupid that is.
Careful, you might start a rumor that MacT has run his course in Anaheim & is available for 12 used jock straps & 4 duffle bags of broken sticks... What do you think, 10 pages by the weekend?
 

LuGBuG

Quack Quack
Sponsor
Mar 16, 2006
4,742
3,302
Ducks
Habs aren't moving 7th overall for Zegras. Makes no sense. They will get a similar player at 7 who is 5 years younger and 6 million a year cheaper.

Deal based around Jets pick.
In the last decade players under 22 with at least 100 games played points per game Zegras ranks 16th. Also check the players ahead of him. Quite a list. Good luck with that player being similar.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yemeth

Ncit3

Registered User
Oct 19, 2011
3,421
3,860
Colorado
I know he's not a RHD, but what about Byram for Zegras as a starting point? I know the Avs would likely have to add, but what about a starting framework. Feel like Zegras would be exactly what the Avs need and Byram could be a great developmental piece for Anaheim. Considering when he's not been weighed down by anchors like RyJo, he's been fantastic.
 

Dr Johnny Fever

Eggplant and Teal
Apr 11, 2012
22,060
6,929
Lower Left Coast
It seems you logged in and replied with the wrong account
Anybody who decides to collect clicks by saying a GM is "listening" on a player is saying absolutely nothing. Every GM will listen when called. That's their job. That's not "insider" information. He can make that statement anytime, anywhere about any player and it doesn't mean the player is in play. But some people aren't smart enough to see that.

He's garbage and heading to the Eklund level with this kind of crap.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MCB and Ducks DVM

Zegs2sendhelp

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2012
42,548
39,392
I know he's not a RHD, but what about Byram for Zegras as a starting point? I know the Avs would likely have to add, but what about a starting framework. Feel like Zegras would be exactly what the Avs need and Byram could be a great developmental piece for Anaheim. Considering when he's not been weighed down by anchors like RyJo, he's been fantastic.
Personally not a big fan of byram as a base, I think it would have to end up a 3way deal where the 3rd team wants byram

We just have so many good young lhd, we’re almost getting the point where we have to ship them out for other pieces
 
Last edited:

Spring in Fialta

A malign star kept him
Apr 1, 2007
27,158
16,038
Montreal, QC
Touched a nerve I guess. Not a flex, we just get a lot of traffic sunshine. That's why we shouldn't get called over any flake comments. We have a lot of fans, Greater Montreal has over 4 million in population. We don't have an NFL team, an NBA team or an MLB team. All us Montreal sports fans basically just have the Habs.

You guys in Anaheim/LA have tons of sports options. Everyone out here just throws their manic fandom on the Canadiens. You guys think crapping on us because of posts on a Zegras thread... If Dreger posted about the Habs trying to trade for Morgan Frost this morning on 690 there'd be 10 pages before nightfall.

I'm a Habs fan and Habs fans 1000 percent deserve to be bashed in this thread. The Zegras thread on our board is weird and stupid.
 

FiveTacos

Registered User
Oct 2, 2017
1,007
1,788
The Twilight Zone
Personally not a big fan of byram as a base, I think it would have to end up a 3way deal where the 3rd team wants byram

We just have so many good young lhd, we’re almost getting the point where we have to ship them out for other pieces

And for that matter, protected firsts aren't that enticing either. The Ducks not only have a deep system, they have like 6 picks in the first 3 rounds this year. You can get to a point where you just have too many to develop properly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lwvs84

Slats432

Registered User
Jun 2, 2002
15,377
3,793
hockeypedia.com
I read someone talking about offering a pick in the 8-12 range for him.

If you use Bob McKenzie's list, too much? not enough?

8
2.png
Konsta Helenius (C/RW)Jukurit
2.png
Liiga
441320336
9
3.png
Zayne Parekh (D)Saginaw Spirit
3.png
OHL
5227527944
10
3.png
Berkly Catton (F)Spokane Chiefs
3.png
WHL
5441488941
11
6.png
Trevor Connelly (LW)Tri-City Storm
6.png
USHL
3620325240
12
3.png
Carter Yakemchuk (D)Calgary Hitmen
3.png
WHL
53263258103
13
6.png
Zeev Buium (D)Univ. of Denver
6.png
NCAA
288293716
 

LuGBuG

Quack Quack
Sponsor
Mar 16, 2006
4,742
3,302
Ducks
I read someone talking about offering a pick in the 8-12 range for him.

If you use Bob McKenzie's list, too much? not enough?

Why would we take a pick in that range for Trevor Zegras just to hope we get Trevor Zegras
 

Zegs2sendhelp

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2012
42,548
39,392
I read someone talking about offering a pick in the 8-12 range for him.

If you use Bob McKenzie's list, too much? not enough?

I think there would have to be an add from the team on top of that. While I think some of those guys could be pretty solid…. You’re still hoping best case scenario is zegras talent player, but taking all the risk.
 

Slats432

Registered User
Jun 2, 2002
15,377
3,793
hockeypedia.com
Why would we take a pick in that range for Trevor Zegras just to hope we get Trevor Zegras
Not my idea, read it as a proposal somewhere. I don't know why Anaheim does anything, like paying Killorn $6.25M for the next four years, or strong arming guys in negotiations. Not my circus, not my monkey. :dm:
 

LuGBuG

Quack Quack
Sponsor
Mar 16, 2006
4,742
3,302
Ducks
That's too much. I can see Jets pick. Plus Savard who they can flip for another first. That's two firsts, it's enough.
No it’s not. Do some research.

He’s tied for 3rd from his draft in points, 6 points behind 2nd while playing the 9th most games.

16th in ppg for players under 22 in the past decade with pretty much all studs ahead of him.

Why would we ever deal him for a late first and a maybe first. Give me one reason that actually makes sense and backed up with any sort of facts or logic. Just one reason. I’m waiting.
 
Last edited:

LuGBuG

Quack Quack
Sponsor
Mar 16, 2006
4,742
3,302
Ducks
Not my idea, read it as a proposal somewhere. I don't know why Anaheim does anything, like paying Killorn $6.25M for the next four years, or strong arming guys in negotiations. Not my circus, not my monkey. :dm:
A back to back 25 goal scorer that has won multiple Cups for a young team to learn from that will have zero negative impact from that cap hit. That contract is not a big deal at all and at least a million of it is just for help in the room.

If they were anywhere even remotely close to the cap then yeah it might be tough but it doesn’t matter in the slightest.
 

ole ole

Registered User
Oct 7, 2017
11,999
6,088
In a vacuum, it’s prob at least in discussion.

i think the protection needs to be more favorable to Anaheim(maybe top 3 protection)…. This draft isn’t outstanding, and most of what you’ll get after 3 would be happy to get a zegras quality player in.

oilers pick is okay, not really a need but an okay piece to have

I could see us liking Kovacevic and barron as a piece coming back, gives us more RHD depth which is a need.


Depending on where the main piece(montreal pick) lands, I’d say Montreal would need to add a young forward or prospect forward.

Granted I don’t think zegras is realistically available and I don’t think we should move him. Other part is we already have a high pick this year to get what we’d want in the draft, so unless we have 2 guys we want in the top 10 idk how much value that 1st has in a zegras deal

Our pick could just as easily be the 5th OA. Throwing in another 1st plus Kovacevic and Barron and talk of Beck for Zegras. I would pass. Not counting we lose Savard and a 3rd to boot on top of that.
Count me out.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: viceroy

Ad

Ad

Ad