scott clam
Registered User
- Sep 12, 2018
- 1,108
- 535
about the same amount of time if he's drinking whisky and snorting blow every other night.How long does Theo Fleury play without being short?
about the same amount of time if he's drinking whisky and snorting blow every other night.How long does Theo Fleury play without being short?
You should know better.about the same amount of time if he's drinking whisky and snorting blow every other night.
All that is true. But it doesn't change the fact that it was his heavy drug (ab)use that derailed his career, and not his short stature. That's the point I was trying to make. I'm not trying to moralize. It's totally understandable why a person would use substances as a coping mechanism, after experiencing something like that.You should know better.
If he hadn't been abused, he probably wouldn't have had substance abuse.
Not all alcoholism and drug use is inherited.
Height was part of his born constitution, not a result of some chance event in his life. Similarly, Lemieux didn't get some virus; he inherited a condition.
"Derailed" was my word, but Fleury definitely made the most out of his low centre of gravity. He's borderline HOF already, and I think if he were just a little bit more consistent during his prime years he makes it in, size be damned. That, and if he didn't crash and burn the way that he did, after the SLC Olympics.I never said his short stature 'derailed' his career. But he likely would be a lock for the HHOF if his physicality was combined with some physical size to check opponents harder.
Lemieux was at 18 points after 15 games.
Before his heart problems started it surely felt that he was getting bettter and finding his way.
Sure, he was slow as hell and a liabilty on defense, but he still was a force on the power play.
He was pretty useless 5 on 5, but I am sure if he had one other quality player on the first line, things would have looked a lot differently.
People act like he was a total bum in 05/06 , which surely isnt true when you take a closer look.
Not sure here:He was pretty useless 5 on 5, but I am sure if he had one other quality player on the first line, things would have looked a lot differently.
It shows that Lemieux was still productive in the first stretch of the season. Many people make it seem as he was doing absolutely nothing that season, hence the idea of him playing longer would seem unreasinable.You want a useless ES player on the first line? Not sure what 18 points after 15 games has to do with anything?
Allow me to disagree here. Lemieux barely played with Crosby on the first line.Not sure here:
NHL Stats
The official source for NHL Stats including skaters, goalies, teams stats and more.www.nhl.com
NHL Stats
The official source for NHL Stats including skaters, goalies, teams stats and more.www.nhl.com
You had Palffy-Crosby, Recchi was there, that group did not last for long with injuries pilling, but Palffy-Crosby were among the top players in even strength points before Lemieux retired, there was no lack of talented first liner candidate on that team before Palffy leave.