The 2024-2025 Roster Thread

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
That's his defense. Okay, Dahlin is playing injured. But he has no chemistry with Jokiharju. Top 4 RD still missing. Byram is left-handed, we needed a right-hander. Power is developing, and it seems to be going well. Ruff says he doesn't like it when a guy plays on the wrong side. Samuelsson is deteriorating, plagued by injuries, Clifton is just a physical guy from the third pair.

Adams created this defense himself, he could have done it differently.

No chemistry aside from his consistently best possession metrics.
 
If you don't believe in possession stats they also have by far the best counting stats this season too.
That's not the point, it's just that statistics don't always reflect what's actually happening on the ice and what doesn't pass the eye test. I've already talked about this here before, why Dahlin and Joki have good metrics, but they don't have chemistry and they don't fit together.
 
That's not the point, it's just that statistics don't always reflect what's actually happening on the ice and what doesn't pass the eye test. I've already talked about this here before, why Dahlin and Joki have good metrics, but they don't have chemistry and they don't fit together.

So for years they've had good raw numbers GF/GA AND good possession stats, but none of that matches your eye test?

Maybe both sets of stats are wrong.
 
So for years they've had good raw numbers GF/GA AND good possession stats, but none of that matches your eye test?

Maybe both sets of stats are wrong.
How many points did Dahlin score with Joki and how many with Samuelsson? Also how effective was Dahlin on RD compared to how he plays on LD, do you have that stat?
 
How many points did Dahlin score with Joki and how many with Samuelsson? Also how effective was Dahlin on RD compared to how he plays on LD, do you have that stat?

We have goals scored while those pairings were on the ice yes.

In 2023-2024
Dahlin - Jokiharju 14 goals for // 12 goals against
Dahiln - Samuelsson 12 goals for // 21 goals against

Generally speaking he plays much higher event hockey as a RD than as a LD. Bryam-Dahlin were on the ice for a combined 8 goals/60 minutes last year. That's an insane bonkers pond hockey rate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dingo44
Unpopular opinion: The roster is fine.
Sure, they have a sputtering 2nd line, currently mediocre goaltending from their young tandem and a 1D that isn't fully healthy.
But that's par for the course over an 82 game season.
They also play good 5v5 hockey and are one point removed from a playoff spot.
We also know what the real problem is: Special teams.
 
I'm weird, because the takeaway I got from this chart is:

Benson gets an initial to distinguish himself from all the other Bensons.

Samuelsson gets his full first name to distinguish himself from all the other M. Samuelssons.

Thompson just gets called Tage for some reason.
His name isn't Thompson, it's Tage.
 
I'm weird, because the takeaway I got from this chart is:

Benson gets an initial to distinguish himself from all the other Bensons.

Samuelsson gets his full first name to distinguish himself from all the other M. Samuelssons.

Thompson just gets called Tage for some reason.
This chart doesn't pass the eye test
 
Benson gets an initial to distinguish himself from all the other Bensons.
1729676536000.jpeg
 
I'm weird, because the takeaway I got from this chart is:

Benson gets an initial to distinguish himself from all the other Bensons.

Samuelsson gets his full first name to distinguish himself from all the other M. Samuelssons.

Thompson just gets called Tage for some reason.
This checks out. I call everyone by their last name, but I say Tage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jacob582
Hate to be the bearer of bad news, Mcleod has a 40% shooting percentage. 10 total shots. 10 shots in...8 games? His goal scoring is going to drop to invisible once his streak cools off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BFLO
Hate to be the bearer of bad news, Mcleod has a 40% shooting percentage. 10 total shots. 10 shots in...8 games? His goal scoring is going to drop to invisible once his streak cools off.
Sure but it's also unlikely Cozens continues to shoot 0%. We have some regression in both directions for a bunch of players and it will likely even out. Let's pretend Cozens and McLeod both go to around 10%. That's 3.7 goals from them combined instead of just 4 from McLeod himself. Sure we are getting lucky from Mcleod but we are also getting unlucky with some other players.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Deep Blue Metallic
Sure but it's also unlikely Cozens continues to shoot 0%. We have some regression in both directions for a bunch of players and it will likely even out. Let's pretend Cozens and McLeod both go to around 10%. That's 3.7 goals from them combined instead of just 4 from McLeod himself. Sure we are getting lucky from Mcleod but we are also getting unlucky with some other players.
For sure. I just would not expect 20+ from Mcleod.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mattilaus
For sure. I just would not expect 20+ from Mcleod.
Maybe not. But he was on pace for 16 goals two seasons ago. He’s at roughly the same age a few other players have taken another step in their game.

He certainly won’t maintain his current scoring pace or shooting %. But he doesn’t need to be near either to put up 20 goals.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SECRET SQUIRREL
McLeod has the same xGF% as Cozens. If he's passing an eye test it's because he's scored some timely goals, and is generally getting difficult deployment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chainshot

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad