Bobby9
Registered User
- Feb 10, 2019
- 3,045
- 4,063
Theirs absolutely no way the Canucks should sign him to a long term contract. That would be the final nail in the coffin.
He has to take a back up role unfortunately with his injury history.I'm actually willing to gamble on Demko. Extend him for 3-4 years at $6M AAV. He probably won't take it though. Probably play things out and see if he can get that Vezina goalie calibre money.
You can't be serious with Demko at 2x2. He will never take less than what he is making now despite his injuries. Dude is 29 and he is looking for his last payday. Offering him 2 mil is like a spit in the face. I'd rather we move him at the deadline if he is healthy and get something for him.He has to take a back up role unfortunately with his injury history.
Love the player, hate the issues
Lank to a 4x4.
Demko to a 2x2 as back up.
I want a 10 who makes 200k a year and isn’t high maintenance. What’s your point?You can't be serious with Demko at 2x2. He will never take less than what he is making now despite his injuries. Dude is 29 and he is looking for his last payday. Offering him 2 mil is like a spit in the face. I'd rather we move him at the deadline if he is healthy and get something for him.
I want a 10 who makes 200k a year and isn’t high maintenance. What’s your point?
No GM is giving him what he wants