Bobby9
Registered User
- Feb 10, 2019
- 3,062
- 4,073
Theirs absolutely no way the Canucks should sign him to a long term contract. That would be the final nail in the coffin.
Player Discussion Thatcher Demko
- Thread starter Mr. Canucklehead
- Start date
-
Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
I'm actually willing to gamble on Demko. Extend him for 3-4 years at $6M AAV. He probably won't take it though. Probably play things out and see if he can get that Vezina goalie calibre money.
Bobby9
Registered User
- Feb 10, 2019
- 3,062
- 4,073
He has to take a back up role unfortunately with his injury history.
Love the player, hate the issues
Lank to a 4x4.
Demko to a 2x2 as back up.
You can't be serious with Demko at 2x2. He will never take less than what he is making now despite his injuries. Dude is 29 and he is looking for his last payday. Offering him 2 mil is like a spit in the face. I'd rather we move him at the deadline if he is healthy and get something for him.
Bonham
Registered User
Lankinen has done a great job this season and I hope he's re-signed.
That said, the Canucks are not getting past the top teams in the West without Demko back playing true to form. I would rather gamble on his health over the next couple seasons than take a mediocre package of picks.
Hopefully this injury is just a blip as he was just starting to heat up.
That said, the Canucks are not getting past the top teams in the West without Demko back playing true to form. I would rather gamble on his health over the next couple seasons than take a mediocre package of picks.
Hopefully this injury is just a blip as he was just starting to heat up.
Breakers
Make Mirrored Visors Legal Again
Bobby9
Registered User
- Feb 10, 2019
- 3,062
- 4,073
I want a 10 who makes 200k a year and isn’t high maintenance. What’s your point?
No GM is giving him what he wants
No GM is going to give him a 7 year contract.
Someone will offer him way more than $2 million per year if he's willing to take a two year contract though.
A "back up role" should not be defined by salary but by performance. Peak Demko is simply better than Peak Lankinen.
Bobby9
Registered User
- Feb 10, 2019
- 3,062
- 4,073
how’s his performance been over the last 6 months?A "back up role" should not be defined by salary but by performance. Peak Demko is simply better than Peak Lankinen.
What is it with fans of this team wanting to keep pay insane salaries for players who are injured or players who are showing crazy red flags?
Then let another GM be on the hook for 5-6-7M when he is injured again.
You're talking about two different things. Demko's track record is what it is both performance and injury wise. You obviously don't think he can stay healthy or even perform like a top 10 goalie when healthy so of course for you the proper course is to trade him. There's really not much discussions to be had. If management thinks the way you do, they absolutely should not be thinking of extending Demko.
Bobby9
Registered User
- Feb 10, 2019
- 3,062
- 4,073
What is a top goalie?
I think it´s a good goalie, wich has a good defence in front of him.
Ths goes to show that top goalies for some strange reasons, almost allways end up having top back ups.
There are atleast a hundred top goalies in the world.
You shouldn´t overpay for a top goalie. Get a really good defence and the top goalie will materialize.
I would say a top 10 goalie in the NHL is a "top goalie." Certainly, Demko being a Vezina finalist last year is a "top goalie" when healthy. There are a exceptions, but usually goalies who manage to be Vezina finalists are "top goalies" rather than just having a good year.
A good defence helps but there's the old eye test, save %, and the more modern saves above expected stats to help evaluate goalies.
They do?
There are? Please name the #90-100 ranked "top goalies" in the world.
You get what you pay for. I've always said that you need great goalie performances rather than a great goalie in the playoffs. But you increase your odds of getting that great goalie performance by having a great goalie.
At the end of the day, the better goalie in the playoff series more often than not wins the series.
Regardless we will never agree. I place great value in goaltending and poor goaltending can absolutely sink a team and make it difficult to properly evaluate the defence.
Last edited:
