The Madrigal
Registered User
I am not ignoring it at all. I am simply pointing out to just assume that a 27 year old is going to all of a sudden become significantly more productive and factor that into his contract is playing with fire.So yah just totally ignore the whole bigger role thing
It's actually not. When you factor in the fact that he got a 7 year term which middle six players basically never got (unless they are under 25 and have huge upside) the AAV should have been at a discounted rate. He's making more than Sean Couturier and got two years more term/security.once again the contract is fair value right now, as in he is being paid what he deserves as a middle sixer.
Trade is possible but I doubt teams will be lining up to give up value for a 29 year old 15 goal/40 point guy in 2 years with 5 years of remaining term IF Tampa ends up with buyers remorse as you are suggesting. As far as buy out or burying his contract. To buy Killorn out at some point would result in a dead cap hit for several years so that's not even a realistic option for several years. Also, teams haven't been able to bury bad contracts in the AHL since the last CBA was agreed upon. So again, IF Tampa were to have buyers remores in 2 or 3 years they would likely be stuck with Killorn and that is what makes the combination of a 7 year term, along with AAV he got a risky proposition.Once again if it becomes an anchor can they not trade/buy out/ bury his contract?