Confirmed Signing with Link: [TBL] Alex Killorn (7 years $4.45M AAV)

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

Jester9881

Registered User
May 16, 2006
14,350
3,460
Long Island NY
Even if they trade Bishop with no money coming back, how do they bring in a backup and pay Kucherov, Johnson, Palat, Drouin, Namestnikov and Sustr without going over the cap? This is also assuming they let Boyle walk next offseason.
 

The Madrigal

Registered User
Apr 26, 2016
9,172
6,453
In a simulation
Also

People would do well to realize the term allows the cap hit to be lower

On a 5 year term the hit likely goes up and that is actually worse for TB

So a guy who averages 15 goals and 40 points is worth what on a 5 year deal, 5 million? He isn't worth 4.45 million on a one year deal. If they were going to give him a 7 year deal the cap hit should been in the 3.5 - 4.0 million range. Flat out, this is not a good deal for Tampa. Too much term and an average annual value that cannot be justified for what the player brings to the table.
 

Iceman

Registered User
Jun 9, 2014
10,648
2,042
The AAV was expected but certainly a lot of term. Hopefully he can continue his ways come playoff time, if he plans on staying a career 40 point player.
 

boredmale

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 13, 2005
42,559
7,111
Even if they trade Bishop with no money coming back, how do they bring in a backup and pay Kucherov, Johnson, Palat, Drouin, Namestnikov and Sustr without going over the cap? This is also assuming they let Boyle walk next offseason.

I Believe Tampa, this year had 12M to sign Kucherov, Kilhorn and Namestnikov so if they trade Bishsop(7M) they should have more then enough for this season to sign all 3 and a backup goalie
 

Iceman

Registered User
Jun 9, 2014
10,648
2,042
Killorn brings the size and grit that is pretty much missing from our top 6 entirely besides Palat (who lacks the size).
 

PAZ

.
Jul 14, 2011
17,646
10,088
BC
Killorns a great player, but that term is questionable. It's not like Tampa is starving for another top 6 player, and they have quite a few prospects with top 6 potential.
 

Comely

Registered User
Nov 26, 2007
2,246
288
Cambridge
I guess this means they are trading Bishop, no one is taking Filppula. He costs to much and according to generalphanager he has a nmc so he has to be protected.
 

Jester9881

Registered User
May 16, 2006
14,350
3,460
Long Island NY
I Believe Tampa, this year had 12M to sign Kucherov, Kilhorn and Namestnikov so if they trade Bishsop(7M) they should have more then enough for this season to sign all 3 and a backup goalie

Bishop makes just under 6m, they have 8.5m in room now..... but Hedman gets a sizable bump next season as does Vasilevskiy. Not a lot of wiggle room with this Killorn deal.
 

LeafGrief

Shambles in my brain
Apr 10, 2015
7,827
10,071
Ottawa
Sounds like great dollar value, but the term seems a bit much for a middle sixer. Hope this works out for TB. They've got their core pieces locked up and can be a real threat for a long long time.
 

tjs*

Registered User
Mar 18, 2016
2,103
0
The thing you all have to realize is that this deal (assuming there is no NMC for 2017) does not mean that Killorn is in Yzerman's longterm plans. This season will be tight but manageable: Filppula is the ideal but unlikely choice to be moved, Bishop might go if Dallas meets Yzerman's demands (likely Honka), and failing that Garrison can easily be moved a year ahead of schedule. Next summer all three of them will be gone one way or another and the only remaining question will be which of Killorn, Johnson, Palat, or Drouin we will lose. Killorn will be an attractive cost-controlled piece to a lot of teams, especially after we finally give him a full year in the top six instead of a shutdown role on the third line with guys like Filppula and Callahan, and worst case scenario we can leave him exposed for Vegas to take off our hands. In short this doesn't limit our options one bit.
 

SmellOfVictory

Registered User
Jun 3, 2011
10,959
653
Seems like reasonable value for a good 2nd line winger. Maybe half a mil more expensive than it could've been if he'd taken a slight discount, but not much to complain about.

The thing you all have to realize is that this deal (assuming there is no NMC for 2017) does not mean that Killorn is in Yzerman's longterm plans. This season will be tight but manageable: Filppula is the ideal but unlikely choice to be moved, Bishop might go if Dallas meets Yzerman's demands (likely Honka), and failing that Garrison can easily be moved a year ahead of schedule. Next summer all three of them will be gone one way or another and the only remaining question will be which of Killorn, Johnson, Palat, or Drouin we will lose. Killorn will be an attractive cost-controlled piece to a lot of teams, especially after we finally give him a full year in the top six instead of a shutdown role on the third line with guys like Filppula and Callahan, and worst case scenario we can leave him exposed for Vegas to take off our hands. In short this doesn't limit our options one bit.

Very true. Unless he gets injured or starts doing heroin, TB won't have any problem moving him if they need to.
 

Osprey

Registered User
Feb 18, 2005
27,742
10,433
I'm guessing that Tampa Bay thinks that he'll figure out the regular season sometime soon and was afraid that, after he does, they wouldn't be able to afford to keep him once a shorter contract ended. Based on his abilities, playoff success and entering his prime, it's not a stretch for him to become a consistent 25-goal guy in the regular season. If he reaches that, especially soon, $4.45M would seem very fair, perhaps even a bit of a bargain. Even if he never reaches that, but simply continues being a playoff performer, I doubt that Tampa Bay will mind.
 
Last edited:

notsocommonsense

Registered User
Apr 24, 2013
4,542
4,778
Top 6 players are role players now? What kind of role does he play? PK, defensive specialist or some kind of shutdown role? None of it, because he is top 6 player for the Tampa going forward.

From an outsiders point of view, I was thinking namestnikov might take a top 6 role this year w Killorn moving to the 3rd line. But Tampa fans know the players better than I do, am I way off base?
 

scrubadam

Registered User
Apr 10, 2016
12,438
1,904
So a guy who averages 15 goals and 40 points is worth what on a 5 year deal, 5 million? He isn't worth 4.45 million on a one year deal. If they were going to give him a 7 year deal the cap hit should been in the 3.5 - 4.0 million range. Flat out, this is not a good deal for Tampa. Too much term and an average annual value that cannot be justified for what the player brings to the table.

1 million for every 10 points unless you bring some crazy intangibles.

So right now at 4.45 he is about .45 overpaid, but his great playoffs make up for that. Also all he needs to do is avg 45 points and the deal will be fine. Killhorn isn't some 35 year old he can still grow a bit.
 

scrubadam

Registered User
Apr 10, 2016
12,438
1,904
I guess this means they are trading Bishop, no one is taking Filppula. He costs to much and according to generalphanager he has a nmc so he has to be protected.

I understand the cap situation, but I don't know about trading Bishop from a TB perspective. I am a habs fan so only see Bishop a few times a year but to me he seems like a very important piece of the team. I almost put him at Price level for TB. I just cant imagine the team not missing a Vezna goalie if he is traded. And there is also the point that TB has yet to win in the playoffs (with Cooper) without Bishop.
 

The Madrigal

Registered User
Apr 26, 2016
9,172
6,453
In a simulation
Teams like the Leafs and Flyers who signed key RFA's early are looking really smart right about right now. Couturier at 4.2 million and Kadri at 4.5 million look like steals after some of the deals like this one that were signed this summer.
 

Jayevs

Formerly avsman
Jul 29, 2010
4,267
574
Sounds like about a million too much right now. Always thought of him as a McGinn level player.
 

BHD

Here comes Skinner
Dec 27, 2009
38,381
16,855
Moncton, NB
The contract isn't terrible. The issue, though, is how it could - depending on what Yzerman does - affect their salary structure moving forward. Although, Yzerman has maneuvered through things pretty well up to this point.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad