Drytoast
Registered User
- Sep 27, 2017
- 6,602
- 4,819
You thinking it doesn't is living in fairy tale land.Tavares deal has nothing to do with what Matthews got paid. Anyone who thinks otherwise is kidding themself
You thinking it doesn't is living in fairy tale land.Tavares deal has nothing to do with what Matthews got paid. Anyone who thinks otherwise is kidding themself
Is everybody still loving this signing? I was against it from day one and it's looking like I was right! This deal is going to be bad! It might even be the reason this Leafs team never wins a cup.
You thinking it doesn't is living in fairy tale land.
I'm one of many posters here who understand that it may be the best thing for the team going forward.Aren’t you the guy trumpeting to move JT to 3C?
I believe you could have gotten Matthews closer to 10 without Tavares in the locker room making 11 and Matthews out performing him.No, it’s the reality. If you don’t think Matthews was getting paid between Eichel and McDavid on the term he wanted with or without JT here then you’re the one living in fairy tale land
he was brought in to help us win the cup or at least go deep so no he hasn't fulfilled his ''part of the bargain''How were you right? He has 377 points in 384 games with the Leafs, which puts him 24th over that time, he's fulfilled his part of the bargain. If you were going to say that we dont need an $11m, second line center, that I would agree with.
Agents have said they use internal cap structure when signing RFA. That could be because they were negotiating with Dubas and the Leafs, but that’s what they said on Leafs lunch.Tavares deal has nothing to do with what Matthews got paid. Anyone who thinks otherwise is kidding themself
Agents will use whatever numbers that will get their client the highest contract possible. During Tavares' first season I always just thought to myself, we just gave this guy 11m, and Matthews is already better than him. How can you justify giving him less. And it looks like thats exactly the argument his agent brought to the table.Agents have said they use internal cap structure when signing RFA. That could be because the were negotiating with Dubas and the Leafs, but that’s what they said on Leafs lunch.
I think it was Nylander's agent on Leafs Lunch that said it. Yes, it change the pay structure of the team. and killed their chances.Agents will use whatever numbers that will get their client the highest contract possible. During Tavares' first season I always just thought to myself, we just gave this guy 11m, and Matthews is already better than him. How can you justify giving him less. And it looks like thats exactly the argument his agent brought to the table.
Now you're just being silly.
Aren’t you the guy trumpeting to move JT to 3C?
Not changing the subject at all… answer your question?I'm one of many posters here who understand that it may be the best thing for the team going forward.
But why are you changing the subject instead of actually answering questions?
maybe you can tell us why you think he should have come between those two but for 3 yrs less termEichel got 13.33%, McDavid 16.67%. Matthews got 14.64%.
If you don’t think he comes in between those two regardless of JT, I really don’t know what to tell you.
Scoring 4 goals in his NHL debut… finishing 2nd for the Rocket with 40 goals, winning the Calder… winning 2 more Rockets.maybe you can tell us why you think he should have come between those two but for 3 yrs less term
he won 2 Rockets before he signed coming off his elc , maybe you should double check thatScoring 4 goals in his NHL debut… finishing 2nd for the Rocket with 40 goals, winning the Calder… winning 2 more Rockets.
Where did you think he was going to land in regards to salary?
he was brought in to help us win the cup or at least go deep so no he hasn't fulfilled his ''part of the bargain''
but i know i know it's not his fault , it's his teammates fault who keep letting him down
why would we be restricted to 4.5 million for a defensive improvement? there's no connection that because we signed JT to 11 million doesn't mean we could only spend Kadir's current 4.5 million. the salary cap was 80ish million.If you still can't see the difference in 1C and 2C (and now you're moving the goalposts), there's no point in wasting more of my time.
Do you really believe that using $4.5M would have given us a greater defensive improvement than using $11M?
I'm glad you got me now explain why he was brought in if not to help advance the team .So then every player except for 20 fail their part of the bargain? Gotchya ... I'm gonna use your logic ... McDavid sux because he has not won a cup... he has not lived up to his expectations ... booo McSucks...
He did score the game winner to advance Toronto into the second round… something they haven’t done since JT was playing pee wee hockey.I'm glad you got me now explain why he was brought in if not to help advance the team .
was it for his sparkling personality or maybe it was to teach the younguns to squeeze for every dollar they can get ?
I asked a question, your response was to change the subject - who's being silly (or just evasive)?Not changing the subject at all… answer your question?
Ok, No, I’m not being silly… Tavares is our 1B Center… the fact you see him as 3C is what’s ridiculous.
you'll always have the fond memories of Johnny banking one of a foot and the team and Dubas partying like they just won the cup to share with your grandkidsHe did score the game winner to advance Toronto into the second round… something they haven’t done since JT was playing pee wee hockey.
I know what you’re thinking… but, but, why did it have to be John Tavares?
The logic I responded to was along the lines of 'we signed JT so we had the Kadri money to spend on D'. I just pointed out that if we hadn't signed JT we would have had Kadri and more money for D.why would we be restricted to 4.5 million for a defensive improvement? there's no connection that because we signed JT to 11 million doesn't mean we could only spend Kadir's current 4.5 million. the salary cap was 80ish million.
your right about the center discussion because you seem to believe only 1 center on a team can get #1 center ice-time. which is false. like for example in 2012-13 Crosby's TOI/GP was 21:06 and Malkin's was 19:42 so you believe Malkin is a 2C because he got less ice time then Crosby.
A couple of posters do like to point that out, without mentioning that it was a dump towards the net from a bad angle , that happened to bounce in off a defender's skate. It was also his only goal in the last 9 playoff games.He did score the game winner to advance Toronto into the second round… something they haven’t done since JT was playing pee wee hockey.
I know what you’re thinking… but, but, why did it have to be John Tavares?
Eichel got 13.33%, McDavid 16.67%. Matthews got 14.64%.
If you don’t think he comes in between those two regardless of JT, I really don’t know what to tell you.