Confirmed with Link: Tanner Pearson and 3rd (2025) Traded to Montreal for Casey DeSmith

Miller Time

Registered User
Sep 16, 2004
24,310
17,163
The Kent lovers will never ever find anything wrong with his odd moves lol

What is it that you find wrong about this move?

You'd have preferred keeping DeSmith & his cap charge for sending him to Laval, where he'd take development time from the goalies we have there, than getting a pick for a bit of cap space we aren't using anyways?

That was MBs regular practice... utter stupidity not to leverage cap space wherever possible to add draft/prospect assets imo... especially with an owner willimg to spend.

Some of us just like sound asset management I guess :dunno:
 

badfish

Habs fan in ON
Sponsor
Nov 12, 2005
2,873
3,179
ON
Kent has pretty much built a great reputation at this point in finding homes for players when they want to move and finding trades for GMs struggling to make room. Most of his trades have been in some way a win win scenario for both teams.

For fans it can be hard to see the value in that. Bergevin used to call everyone but that didn't mean he worked with everyone. Hughes is building a good relationship as a guy who can get everyone moving to their goals. That's going to help the next time a team has a player who wants to move and Montreal is free on the list. The GM will know he can make a deal with the Habs that works for everyone.

There's a long term plan in place with this club and the next two drafts is a big part in establishing it. It's okay if your favourite prospect doesn't get a locked spot due to a 31 year old on the team taking up some of the time. It's not about this season. It's not about next season. This is a long term project and I'm confident in Hughes and Gorton.

(Even if I still think they got it wrong at last year's draft)
I've had to do some negotiations in my life for high value contracts, etc. I learned to not approach a negotiation trying to win / avoid to lose. The idea is actually to try and find a way to trade off on variables to make more value for both parties. I'd suspect with Hughes background he understands this concept and is a master at it.
 

Habs Halifax

Loyal Habs Fan
Jul 11, 2016
70,805
27,859
East Coast
Interesting move. Added a 3rd and a guy they can trade for a pick at the TDL (if healthy). He’s probably in and out of the lineup all season and that may help him stay healthy. Could gain some momentum from that. 3rd is a decent dart.. top 75-100 ish

If no other moves, I’m guessing they gave up on Price going to LTIR before the season starts?
 

JoelWarlord

Registered User
May 7, 2012
6,451
10,187
Halifax
DeSmith would have been claimed at end of camp. He's NHL caliber backup.

Pearson 3.5m and Petry 2.3m for two more years. We could have got a real top asset
Like who? Free agency this year was a wasteland, and we still have ample cap space right now to trade for a big salary if a good opportunity becomes available. You're also omitting that we'd still have Hoffman at 4.5M without doing these moves (not that his contract would have prevented us from adding a bigger salary either).
The Kent lovers will never ever find anything wrong with his odd moves lol
We absorbed a marginal 1.7M in Pearson to get a 3rd for DeSmith instead of a 4th/5th or losing him on waivers. There's no real reason to roll three goalies, and Allen is likely untradeable at his cap number. Seems like a completely straightforward move to me, and I don't see where you're seeing panic from trading one of our two generic veteran backup/1Bs.
 
Last edited:

Balthazar

I haven't talked to the trainers yet
Sponsor
Apr 25, 2006
52,158
56,392
So instead of getting rid of Armia, Gallagher, Dvorak and Anderson they bring a new one of these? To replace Hoffman?

How many useless vet forwards do you need on a rebuilding team?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ReHabs and Tyson

Habs

It's going to be a long year
Feb 28, 2002
22,805
17,597
What is it that you find wrong about this move?

You'd have preferred keeping DeSmith & his cap charge for sending him to Laval, where he'd take development time from the goalies we have there, than getting a pick for a bit of cap space we aren't using anyways?

That was MBs regular practice... utter stupidity not to leverage cap space wherever possible to add draft/prospect assets imo... especially with an owner willimg to spend.

Some of us just like sound asset management I guess :dunno:

I wish he just held on a bit to these assets and see what happens after training camp, injuries to other teams etc. I don't see the panic to move a goalie yet, that's all
 

ReimanSum1908

Registered User
Feb 23, 2012
742
1,022
Montreal
So instead of getting rid of Armia, Gallagher, Dvorak and Anderson they bring a new one of these? To replace Hoffman?

How many useless vet forwards do you need on a rebuilding team?
We have no prospects to play on the Habs and we're tanking for another three years.

This is a solid move because the point is precisely this: to load the team with worthless, broken down bodies that will help us lose while prospects are placed in positions to develop within the proper leagues.

We just added a third round pick for nothing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SlafySZN and Andy

Fish on The Sand

Untouchable
Feb 28, 2002
60,361
2,131
Canada
So instead of getting rid of Armia, Gallagher, Dvorak and Anderson they bring a new one of these? To replace Hoffman?

How many useless vet forwards do you need on a rebuilding team?
Gallagher isn't a tradable commodity. We're stuck with that one until we can pretend he's too injured to play again.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ReimanSum1908

japhi

Registered User
Jul 7, 2014
3,778
3,131
So instead of getting rid of Armia, Gallagher, Dvorak and Anderson they bring a new one of these? To replace Hoffman?

How many useless vet forwards do you need on a rebuilding team?
The picks that he is stockpiling will help with moving a few of those players. But they aren't paying to get rid of Dvo or Anderson, you may not like them but they are useful players and have value.
 

SlafySZN

Registered User
May 21, 2022
7,528
16,316
We have no prospects to play on the Habs and we're tanking for another three years.

This is a solid move because the point is precisely this: to load the team with worthless, broken down bodies that will help us lose while prospects are placed in positions to develop within the proper leagues.

We just added a third round pick for nothing.
This.

Now you potentially have one more body to play if and when there's injury instead of rushing kids who shouldn't play in the NHL right now anyway.
 

Miller Time

Registered User
Sep 16, 2004
24,310
17,163
I wish he just held on a bit to these assets and see what happens after training camp, injuries to other teams etc. I don't see the panic to move a goalie yet, that's all

Fair. Though the number of teams with both a need at back-up goalie & the cap space/swap to make it work is a constraint.

Even if an injury comes up, few teams would be that desperate for a backup to make the trade va just wait the Habs out & pick up DeSmith on waivers.

I prefer the certainty of the pick + the intangible benefits (both of finding a landing spot for the vet & making a win-win deal with a team that could be a future trade partner) than holding out for a longshot at getting a pick without any cap$ coming back.

Either way, kinda silly to equate recognizing the inherent value of the move as a carte blanche support for the GM
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad