Confirmed with Link: Tanner Pearson and 3rd (2025) Traded to Montreal for Casey DeSmith

Gaylord Q Tinkledink

Registered User
Apr 29, 2018
33,512
36,740
I wouldn’t go that far. But a rebuilding team that isn’t bad enough to pick 1st and is up against the cap because of a bunch of useless players that have zero value doesn’t give me much confidence right now.
In the next 2 years 19 players will be ufa, or rfa at some point, so the potential to lose a lot of the dead/meddling weight and to change.

I'm of the belief that either via trade, or free agency Montreal will go for someone this off season.

FA only costs cap and they could overpay a fairly good player to come here and be part of an (hopefully) up and coming team.
 

WG

Registered User
Sep 9, 2008
1,729
1,579
Kent Hughes keeps getting a player from that Hoffman trade tree that we need to somehow get rid of. :laugh:

It's as if we can't be done with the Hoffman trade. There's always a player that we need to remove from the lineup.
It's like Kent is trying to cut the head off the hydra and a new head always grows back. Next up, Pearson for Jack Johnson and a 3rd, then Johnson for Zack Kassian and a 4th, then finally Kassian for Hoffman and a 5th and the cycle can start all over again.
 

le_sean

Registered User
Oct 21, 2006
42,012
45,159
Not every trade needs to be a blockbuster. Trade is fine in isolation. If he rebounds back to his form the year before last though this trade makes our team better when it's the last thing we need.
I wouldn’t hold my breath. He hasn’t been good since 2019-20
 
  • Like
Reactions: WhoAreYou99

Kaladin

Registered User
Nov 5, 2017
787
1,113
I wouldn’t hold my breath. He hasn’t been good since 2019-20
34 points in 68 games (his 2021-2022 season) would have been 4th highest on our team last year. Sounds like a difference making amount of points to me.
 

Chili

Time passes when you're not looking
Jun 10, 2004
8,783
4,907
Vancouver wanted to dump that contract and Habs wanted to move DeSmith. This trade is much better then the Petry deal.
 

Treb

Global Flanderator
May 31, 2011
29,708
30,495
Montreal
Giving Allen extension and big raise to a 4 million caphit. Rainbacher looked so-so in camp, but it was one of best drafts ever. Pearson is piece of glass with 3.5m caphit.

If you think this trade was about acquiring Pearson, you might be the one closer to Bergevin.

We got paid to acquire Pearson's cap hit. Any point he scores or assets he nets us is a bonus.
 

HuGort

Registered User
Jun 15, 2012
21,659
10,644
Nova Scotia
If you think this trade was about acquiring Pearson, you might be the one closer to Bergevin.

We got paid to acquire Pearson's cap hit. Any point he scores or assets he nets us is a bonus.
A lousy third? For 3.5m caphit? I'd rather have the extra 3.5m caproom.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ReHabs

lamp9post

Registered User
Jan 28, 2007
4,460
1,773
Or to make another Dach/Newhook move. Anyway it's hard to criticize a gm for stockpiling picks during a rebuild. I agree there's a limit to that though.

There's no limit to accumulating draft picks as long as you're in a rebuild and have guys with no future with the team to trade, like DeSmith. You can always trade a '25 pick for a '26 pick if you're worried about having too many in any given draft year.

I wouldn’t go that far. But a rebuilding team that isn’t bad enough to pick 1st and is up against the cap because of a bunch of useless players that have zero value doesn’t give me much confidence right now.

Hence why we're in a rebuild. If we weren't up against the cap and had a bunch of useful players with great value, we would probably be in position to contend.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bsl and CaptainKirk

Miller Time

Registered User
Sep 16, 2004
24,310
17,162
A lousy third? For 3.5m caphit? I'd rather have the extra 3.5m caproom.

Not really...

We got a 3rd to take on 1.7M in additional cap cost, while swapping a roster goalie we had no room for, for a roster skater that pushes Pez & Ylonen further down the depth chart.

I'm doubting that this is it roster movement-wise, but if it is, the club is better off now than it was this morning.
 

NekkiChiconey

Registered User
Mar 17, 2016
850
1,136
Lisbon
Well, if there's no other move, it sure seems like there won't be any open spots for the youngsters at camp.

I like it. No one's ready, let them develop together while we clear the remaining bad contracts. They'll get called up when Monahan, Pearson and Ylonen are traded at the deadline.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PhysicX

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad