The Real Timo
Registered User
- Jun 18, 2019
- 16,883
- 20,838
Can't place Pearson... is he moar bigger? Can he fight? If he can't play does he go on LTIR? Can he be worse than Jake Evans on the 4th line? Or Dvorak?
Most of my Canucks fan friends seem to, so you’re probably right.I haven’t seen Tanner play since he was with the Kings but I’m going to guess I’ll hate him as much as Gallagher and Armia
Who else do we have to trade and retain on ?Using our last retention slot on Pearson right now would be dumb.
Does Price's LTIR still count as offseason cap if we activate it?
The Habs rebuild is essentially just Kent doing everyone a solid. Players and GMs.
Monahan and/or Dvorak. But yes if there are no other retention slots to be used before the deadline, we should use it on Pearson.Who else do we have to trade and retain on ?
And the possibility of Pearson not unpacking his suitcase quite yet............lolSo we traded Hoffman and Pitlick for:
2nd round pick
3rd round pick
4th round pick
Tanner Pearson
Nathan Legare
Gustav Lindstrom
% of Petry contract
Very nice !
Can't place Pearson... is he moar bigger? Can he fight? If he can't play does he go on LTIR? Can he be worse than Jake Evans on the 4th line? Or Dvorak?
who would want him? Kent have to give a pick for someone to take Tanner?Pearson is there to make the trade work money wise for the Nucks, I have zero expectation he'll be there when the season starts. They'll flip him for another late pick probably or just waive him since he's healthy now .
I smell a buy-out or LTIR! Too bad Dumb Dumb Bettman couldn't see that there are too many NHL "LTIR" injuries and Expansion could have taken some of those "contracts"I'm actually surprised we got anything for DeSmith in the end, the market seemed pretty dead.
So that’s the big trade LeBrun claimed Hughes was working on!Another top 90 pick for 1.45M of cap space? I'll take it!
Gotta think another move is coming, we already had a lot of forwards before Pearson.
No I’m not complaining. I just find it funny.I'm confused, are you complaining about this trade? This trade makes a lot of sense for Montreal.
The only solid Kent did was for Petry in trading Petry to Detroit. And that was after getting good value in trading him and re-acquiring him.
he can break the big stories!!So that’s the big trade LeBrun claimed Hughes was working on!
Nice going, Pierre.
Can't place Pearson... is he moar bigger? Can he fight? If he can't play does he go on LTIR? Can he be worse than Jake Evans on the 4th line? Or Dvorak?
maybe at some point he uses some of these to make a move ??not a bad move, but I don't entirely understand it. Another 3rd? Hughes already has like 21 picks in the next two drafts. I guess it's currency to move up. Maybe they don't want to lose Primeau on waivers.
Pearson absolutely does not fit in with the high tempo offence MSL is trying to create and Hughes already dumped an overpaid clone in Hoffman.
There has to be something else here, or maybe they just buy out Pearson
fodder6'1
Doesn't fight
Supposedly healthy
He's a winger. 257 faceoffs in 590 games, 39.3%
If we eat some of the salary, sure. He's a decently respected vet still, on the last year of a fairly cheap deal. I could see a team take him for a pick.Kent loves to wheel and deal for picks. good on him. builds the farm
who would want him? Kent have to give a pick for someone to take Tanner?
No I’m not complaining. I just find it funny.
“Sure we’ll take Dach. Sure we’ll take Newhook. Sure we’ll take Matheson. Sure we’ll take Petry. Sure we will trade you to your hometown Jeff. Here we found you a job Casey”
All good moves, but those are all solids. Young guys fallen out of favour, cap casualties, taking less so the player is happy.
I'm assuming another trade involving forwards is coming. Unless they don't care about waining Ylonen.