Tank Thread and Tanking GDT XIX: Tankception (BUF @ CBJ)

  • HFBoards is well aware that today is election day in the US. We ask respectfully to focus on hockey and not politics.
Status
Not open for further replies.

zenthusiast

cybersabre his prophet
Oct 20, 2009
19,120
6,648
I think a more appropriate bills comparison is... Remember the season we started 0-8 and then decided it was the smart thing to go 4-4 to end the season? Luck ended up deciding to return to college after the season...which lessened that blow considerably...but the back half of that year they were just winning meaningless games and "building culture" that led to 4 more seasons and counting of missing the playoffs.

Speaking of the bills...NFL network had the music city Miracle on today. Because the curse.

they ended up still drafting the best player on their team :naughty:
 

TalkingProuder

Registered User
Feb 27, 2015
3,130
475
Buffalo, NY
Ok, don't freak out when I suggest this in a radical quest for an adrenalin rush:

Part of me would like to see the Sabres beat CBJ tonight, just because it is so unlikely AND because it would set the stage for tomorrow----a day that may go down as one of THE most adrenalin-fueled days in Buffalo sports history!

Can anybody appreciate that scenario---even a little?

Yeah, that would be awesome. A new way to torture fans with hope building up for 5-6 months and then snatch that hope away last minute so Ted Nolan can walk out of here with the 29th place trophy. Maybe he can have Dalpe and Ellis drink out of it tomorrow night...
 

sjci

Registered User
Feb 13, 2007
3,594
79
Buffalo
Ok, don't freak out when I suggest this in a radical quest for an adrenalin rush:

Part of me would like to see the Sabres beat CBJ tonight, just because it is so unlikely AND because it would set the stage for tomorrow----a day that may go down as one of THE most adrenalin-fueled days in Buffalo sports history!

Can anybody appreciate that scenario---even a little?

giphy.gif
 

theformat04

Registered User
Mar 26, 2015
22
1
Ok, don't freak out when I suggest this in a radical quest for an adrenalin rush:

Part of me would like to see the Sabres beat CBJ tonight, just because it is so unlikely AND because it would set the stage for tomorrow----a day that may go down as one of THE most adrenalin-fueled days in Buffalo sports history!

Can anybody appreciate that scenario---even a little?

At no point during this season have I cheered for a loss. I'm not trying to act holier than thou, I just never did. But if it comes down to potentially the most embarrassing event in franchise history tomorrow, or rooting for a loss...

I'm hoping we lose.
 

1point21Gigawatts

hell's a gigawatt?
Apr 7, 2010
6,910
3,290
The future
Ok, don't freak out when I suggest this in a radical quest for an adrenalin rush:

Part of me would like to see the Sabres beat CBJ tonight, just because it is so unlikely AND because it would set the stage for tomorrow----a day that may go down as one of THE most adrenalin-fueled days in Buffalo sports history!

Can anybody appreciate that scenario---even a little?

4675064e74be608035200a63349b1fa6f78b7553b2846c980ce05f55eb4762eb.jpg

The madness that would ensue... it certainly would make the day...er...interesting? But no, not at all. I want this mess to be cleaned up tonight.
 

Sabretooth

Registered User
May 14, 2013
3,105
646
Ohio
brian_griffin said:
The SCS data is wrong. It must not factor tie-breakers into account. BUF does not have a 50% chance of finishing 30th with 57 points. BUF has a 66% chance of finishing 30th with 57 points. For the 2 possible combinations where BUF finishes with 57 points (W,OTL or OTL,W), ARI could in turn finish with 56, 57, or 58 points. Two of those ARI outcomes put BUF in 30th place.

Its not wrong. The 50/50 is not calculated the same way you are running your random distribution odds.

I actually just checked this out earlier to confirm, but the 50/50 method does truly assume 50% chance of winning and 50% chance of losing. However it breaks the losing into 37.6% chance the loss will be in regulation and 12.4% chance the loss will be in OT/SO for a loser point. This seems to come from the actual data of outcomes in the league - 2462 game "outcomes" (2 outcomes per GP), and 302 loser points have been awarded. 302/2426 = 12.4%. I ran the numbers and this gives 82.8% chance for the sabres finishing 30th, which matches SCS. It all matches for all the what if scenarios.

I think this is probably more accurate than assuming a 33% chance across all outcomes in a game, since the data does not show a loser point has a 33% chance of occuring across the league. In all outcomes of every game played this year, 50% of the time there will have been a win outcome, 37.6% of the time there will have been a regulation loss outcome, and 12.4% of the time there will have been a loser point outcome. This I believe is what the 50/50 method is trying to represent.

There's some information in the "what is this" link that supports this. The author states that he uses a 22% chance of going into OT, but this seems out of date since he references this was the rate of OT games in 07-08. It makes sense he would be using an up-to-date OT rate today and that probably the page just hasn't been updated.

By the way everybody really should read that "what is this" link in detail, especially before calling the site trash or its numbers trash. It knows what it is and it knows its limitations. http://www.sportsclubstats.com/WhatIsThis.html
 

DeadGhost

Ugistered Reger
Feb 15, 2010
3,943
1,166
As discussed Pitt will be playing with 5 d-men tonight and one of them is Taylor Chorney.

They will have something to play for in game #82.
 

Karate Johnson*

Guest
ok, don't freak out when i suggest this in a radical quest for an adrenalin rush:

Part of me would like to see the sabres beat cbj tonight, just because it is so unlikely and because it would set the stage for tomorrow----a day that may go down as one of the most adrenalin-fueled days in buffalo sports history!

Can anybody appreciate that scenario---even a little?

hell is real!
 

MayDay

Registered User
Oct 21, 2005
12,662
1,148
Pleasantville, NY
Is it too much to ask that this team get blown out for once? Something like 4-0 or 5-0 after the 1st so we can all breathe a little easier?

This is supposed to be one of the statistically worst teams of all time! Don't terrible teams get blown out here and there? When was the last time this team got blown out?
 

Zip15

Registered User
Jun 3, 2009
28,135
5,431
Bodymore
It's going to be a weird scene tomorrow if they get a point. White is already joining Collar from 12-4, either to celebrate McEichel or set the stage for what will be a bizarrely huge game. It's going to be day-long coverage of that game if they point tonight.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad