Kshahdoo
Registered User
Wow, that's some grade A cope.
Of course, and this cope is called truth.
Wow, that's some grade A cope.
I didn't even have to look at the username when I saw this picture. I already knew!
At this point, you have to be trolling.He's definitely improved since I started the topic but the team is still very inconsistent. In the previous game they were destroyed by Phily, today they beat Toronto. The same can be said about Thompson.
I wonder, where he was vs Flyers? 0 points, 3 SOG, -2? And he scored just one goal in todays' game. So it means 2+0 in 8 games and 4+4 in 4 games. Does it look great? Not sure about this.
keep posting here it will help him hit the 50 goal mark eventually.He's definitely improved since I started the topic but the team is still very inconsistent. In the previous game they were destroyed by Phily, today they beat Toronto. The same can be said about Thompson.
I wonder, where he was vs Flyers? 0 points, 3 SOG, -2? And he scored just one goal in todays' game. So it means 2+0 in 8 games and 4+4 in 4 games. Does it look great? Not sure about this.
Thompson was one of the only Sabres that actually showed up in the second game vs the Flyers. Keep box score watching though…He's definitely improved since I started the topic but the team is still very inconsistent. In the previous game they were destroyed by Phily, today they beat Toronto. The same can be said about Thompson.
I wonder, where he was vs Flyers? 0 points, 3 SOG, -2? And he scored just one goal in todays' game. So it means 2+0 in 8 games and 4+4 in 4 games. Does it look great? Not sure about this.
He's definitely improved since I started the topic but the team is still very inconsistent. In the previous game they were destroyed by Phily, today they beat Toronto. The same can be said about Thompson.
I wonder, where he was vs Flyers? 0 points, 3 SOG, -2? And he scored just one goal in todays' game. So it means 2+0 in 8 games and 4+4 in 4 games. Does it look great? Not sure about this.
Versus the game before against the Flyers where he was 1-2-3 and a +3 and pretty much single-handedly provided the scoring to win? Are we going to get selective about shifts now? Portions of shifts?
At this point, you have to be trolling.
slow start is allHe's definitely improved since I started the topic but the team is still very inconsistent. In the previous game they were destroyed by Phily, today they beat Toronto. The same can be said about Thompson.
I wonder, where he was vs Flyers? 0 points, 3 SOG, -2? And he scored just one goal in todays' game. So it means 2+0 in 8 games and 4+4 in 4 games. Does it look great? Not sure about this.
slow start is all
this thread wont age well
I don't know how anyone who has watched the Sabres in the past 5 games can even suggest anyone other than Tage is their best player. Look beyond the stat sheet the dude has been unreal.
5g 9p in 6gp since you started this thread. You can cherry pick any top scorer and find splits like his. Most guys pile up the majority of their points in a relatively small proportion of games.He's definitely improved since I started the topic but the team is still very inconsistent. In the previous game they were destroyed by Phily, today they beat Toronto. The same can be said about Thompson.
I wonder, where he was vs Flyers? 0 points, 3 SOG, -2? And he scored just one goal in todays' game. So it means 2+0 in 8 games and 4+4 in 4 games. Does it look great? Not sure about this.
5g 9p in 6gp since you started this thread. You can cherry pick any top scorer and find splits like his. Most guys pile up the majority of their points in a relatively small proportion of games.
Most players, elite and non-elite.Most or most non-elite?
Most players, elite and non-elite.
McDavid had a majority of his points (77) in 22 games last year, and only 76 points in the other 60 games. Is his non-elite?
Yeah, Tage Thompson isn't Connor McDavid, but my point stands. You're cherry picking a stupidly small sample size and as a result your posts are looking increasingly stupid in this thread.76 points in 60 games and 2 points in 8 games with 12 games played...
Feel free to watch the games and see instead of making this pointless comment. The name doesn't really matter. Is my opinion somehow invalidated for choosing a name related to a player I like? If my name was HockeyGuy123 is it more objective?TageGod: Your Source for Objective News on Tage Thompson.
TageGod: Your Source for Objective News on Tage Thompson.
Feel free to watch the games and see instead of making this pointless comment. The name doesn't really matter. Is my opinion somehow invalidated for choosing a name related to a player I like? If my name was HockeyGuy123 is it more objective?
The winky face means it's a joke.
Matthews has 11 goals and 9 of them are spread between 3 games. I suppose he sucks tooMost or most non-elite?
Not invalidated, no, but your opinion is absolutely biased.....nothing wrong with that, but it is fact.Feel free to watch the games and see instead of making this pointless comment. The name doesn't really matter. Is my opinion somehow invalidated for choosing a name related to a player I like? If my name was HockeyGuy123 is it more objective?
Matthews has 11 goals and 9 of them are spread between 3 games. I suppose he sucks too
Panarin had 63 of his 92 total points last year in just 24 games, and only 29 in his other 58 games.That's why I prefer Panarin (at least so far), who doesn't score a bunch of hatties but scores a point or two in every game. And Rangers have 5 more points than Toronto...