Toggle sidebar

Sudbury Wolves 2022-23 Season Thread (Part 2)

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
djscooter said:
Need to just ignore dirty12; he's at his happiest when the wolves are suffering so he can wander onto other teams' threads and talk about how much better they are then the Wolves. Save your oxygen for worthwhile conversations.
Click to expand...
had to ignore him because he was so over the top about going after all my comments, when i called him on it he got snippy and snarky. done with it, its a message board, bigger things in life as we all saw this weekend
 
  • Like
Reactions: DWI Dale and djscooter
dirty12 said:
Not sure what replay you watched. The one I did has a crystal clear view of backward arm motion by Musty.
Only need one point of contact under the newer rule
Click to expand...
Agreed. However, it appears the opposing player was hanging onto Musty's arm (thus the motion) and then Ertel began to fall. Without Ertel holding Musty's arm, I wonder if he would even have fallen...
 
dirty12 said:
Not sure what replay you watched. The one I did has a crystal clear view of backward arm motion by Musty.
Only need one point of contact under the newer rule
Click to expand...
Can you point me towards the newer definition? The one I quoted and linked from 3 years ago was the newest one I could find. Interested in this newer definition that apparently has been called that way for 4-5 years?
 
HockeyPops said:
Can you point me towards the newer definition? The one I quoted and linked from 3 years ago was the newest one I could find. Interested in this newer definition that apparently has been called that way for 4-5 years?
Click to expand...
Replying
HockeyPops said:
Can you point me towards the newer definition? The one I quoted and linked from 3 years ago was the newest one I could find. Interested in this newer definition that apparently has been called that way for 4-5 years?
Click to expand...
Yeah that newer definition some time before covid 3-4-5 years ago. I can’t really keep track of that.
You don’t need two opposing contacts with motion. So part 3, the arm on the front is the point of contact with backward motion until the legs of both meet without any real intent for leverage, but the replay does show Musty has his arm and leg on the OSH player. I do not see how the slew foot call could be over turned. Reviewed to determine no further discipline for flagrant call; yeah.
 
dirty12 said:
So part 3, the arm on the front is the point of contact with backward motion until the legs of both meet without any real intent for leverage
Click to expand...
It's not just that I don't see any intent for leverage; I don't see any leverage.

The strange thing that stands out to me on the multiple rewatches of this play is the angle that Ertel takes coming into the attacking zone. If he was trying to get ahead of Musty he had a clear path ahead of him, but instead he cuts in front of Musty and leans into him. THAT is what causes him to fall when Musty doesn't push back. In my mind, he could have been called for interference just as easily as Musty could have. Still don't see slew-foot here.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Voice from the North, djscooter, DWI Dale and 1 other person
dirty12 said:
Replying

Yeah that newer definition some time before covid 3-4-5 years ago. I can’t really keep track of that.
You don’t need two opposing contacts with motion. So part 3, the arm on the front is the point of contact with backward motion until the legs of both meet without any real intent for leverage, but the replay does show Musty has his arm and leg on the OSH player. I do not see how the slew foot call could be over turned. Reviewed to determine no further discipline for flagrant call; yeah.
Click to expand...
The 2022-23 rulebook is on the ohl website. The definition looks unchanged from the one previous posted here. I believe it is marginal and see it called on the ice. Musty left leg comes up behind guns right leg just enough to unbalance him. I can certainly see no further discipline being enforced. In Mustys favour I don't think he has been suspended in past
 
  • Like
Reactions: WolvesFan, Voice from the North, HockeyPops and 2 others
bobber said:
If this incident was called a "slewfoot' then be ready for more fantom calls. I think the ref just wanted to say "slewfoot" in a sentence before the Christmas break. Hope he gets a pair of glasses for Christmas.
Click to expand...
What you said AND.....why call it Slewfoot if there's no foot/leg involved? Maybe they should just call it interference.
 
Last edited:
Wiserbud said:
Hopefully, we play Krawchuk more - I think he is worthy of more ice. That should help Ranger for now, I hope. Perhaps Morrow as per Wolf on a Wire, can come in? Gaulton is losing a big part of the year for development with his injury... so not sure what we could expect from him even next year. I am in agreement with billoink.... we may best be served to find another goalie...

Prices are really high, better to sell some assets I think at this time, as I believe the team will make the playoffs, but seriously - Ottawa is a tall order for any team. So selling may be better than buying. Remember, there are just a 'few' teams ahead of us all considering the same options.
Click to expand...
Morrow won't sign here. Rumour has it he turned paps down already. Paps was in cornwall watching the world Jr A challenge, hopefully recruiting someone or still trying on Morrow.
 
When the contenders are done fighting over Wright, Morrison and other high end prospects or OA, our team can package some depth for bottom six forwards and stay at home D. Core players are in place but depth in goaltending and younger F are required….
 
Open for business, let’s see what the next two weeks bring… some tweaks perhaps? Now that Missy might be sellers, is there a player there that can be added to the core for this year and next? Do we have 19 year old players who contending “going for it teams” think can fill holes and add depth that would warrant some extra picks to stock our draft cupboard for next year? Gonna be fun to see how this plays out…..
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bra Wavers
djscooter said:


Shocking I know, given how deadset a certain poster was on here that Musty would be.


Second time this year, maybe the OHL needs to reach out to their refs and explain what a slewfoot actually is.
Click to expand...

Who would be cooter? I called it an automatic slew foot and review. I also stated the league might not issue further discipline since the slew foot did not look malicious
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Isaac Nootin and cub
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom