Bluejaysfan*
Guest
I think you guys are getting me wrong here. I'm not saying this dude is a dud, or that he's not very good. I'm saying realistically, he's not going to be that dynamic offensive gamebreaker who's going to generate eye-popping NHL totals like Subban or Karlsson. If you look at the threads on Hanifin a common comparable that comes up is Pietrangelo and Bouwmeester. While not exactly on the same level Pietrangelo is kinda sort of in a discussion if you compiled a top 10, Bouwmeester isn't. Same with another comparable I've seen, Brent Seabrook.
Reality is, he's not a dud. He's quite possibly a top pairing d-man and correcting for poor development is at least a strong second pairing defenseman.
But he IS NOT, I can't stress this enough, likely to become the second coming of Scott Niedermayer. He's obviously not going to be an imposing game-changer like Pronger or Chara who can turn teams into contenders.
Just want to temper some of the hype on here that he's going to next big thing where he's probably on the level of an all-star but not a Norris trophy winner/finalist.
I think some people, you included that are coming to faults with Hanifin are missing something very important. He plays in a system that isn't really catered to high-octane offense ala Doughty with the Kings. Now Doughty has the talent to probably put up Karlsson/Subban esque numbers but he doesn't need to and plays the safe game while still putting good numbers.
Watching Rielly and Hanifin skating together would be a sight to see for sure. Hanifin is probably the best skating D-man in the draft since Rielly.